is Hrithik Roshan aging badly?

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

@DB_reloaded

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 10 years ago

#31

Originally posted by: AllBlacks1

So, tired= ugly, old, bloated, fat, alcoholic...

Hope u never get tired.

U shus have posted the K3 pics of old Rohit rather. 😉 That wud have made more impact!

When u smile ur cheeks has to support u and the corners of the eyes. He is smiling is real... no fake... coz eyes give it awat between real and fake smile. Hez an actor par excellence. He can look like ugly teenage autistic or Shahenshah Akbar or 65 years old Rohit.

But who am i talking to? ppl who love genda type midget, who walks like a stich stick up in his ass, with synthetic hair and shit loads of botox all over face with eye bags abt to pop out? hahahah

ya tired=ugly😆😆

just because of 1-2 bad shots the person has turned into ugly😆

Quote

Resident_Evil

@Resident_Evil

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 10 years ago

#32

Yes. He is aging VERY badly.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Neetz

@.Jane..

Stunner

+ 7

Posted: 10 years ago

#33

As much as I hate to admit, he isn't aging well. He still looks good imo but when I compare him to the Khans or Akki or other senior actors in their early 40s, they looked so much better!

Quote

theprince

@theprince

Rocker

Posted: 10 years ago

#34

you choose the worst picture and forget the other why you didnt release the new still for his brand with tuger

to see who he age

this forum didnt read that hrithik shoot the song and he cant even walk because of the pain

so relax bollywood and most indian still see him the greatest in the term of look

Quote

Cutiepie_Rani

@Cutiepie_Rani

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#35

OMG if HR is aging badly, then what does aging well look like? This man doesn't even look 40! He's so fine!

Quote

1043801

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#36

LMAO, just one thread criticizing HR and TM is the target. Ufff fanboys, sooo touchy...

OT: Yes. And the fact 50 yr old Khans have been brought in for defense says it all...

Quote

707763

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#37

LOL AM I READING comments about SALMAN KHAN? LOL.

hahahahahaha... 🤣

Hrithik got nothing on Salman except for height. Salman looks better than Hrithik. -- Yes Salman puts on weight 6 months and goes lean the remaining 6 months. That's how he is. He loves his Mutton.

Wow people can really not live without Salman on this forum. LOL.

Considering Salman is like 10 years older than Hrithik, there is no competition and if there is than Salman leads Hrithik by miles. Lastly, when Salman was 40 years old, he looked much better than what this self proclaimed GREEK GOD looks like. I can only see him getting uglier from now onwards. He will look like shit when he is 50.

Quote

643898

Hibernated

Posted: 10 years ago

#38

Salman when he was 40😆

Edited by Deathstroke - 10 years ago

Quote

707763

Suspended

Posted: 10 years ago

#39

Salman when he was 41 vs this ugly bloated person at 41

Quote

JustWandering

@JustWandering

Voyager

+ 4

Posted: 10 years ago

#40

Oh god! So they found ONE BAD PIC of hrithik from a 48 hour shoot? Let the haters have fun, it's not very often they find something to celebrate and lol at the person comparing and saying salman is better looking than HR, funniest thing I heard all day! Height, hair, eyelashes, lips, jawline. Even his body His features are better than them all. Also don't forgrt he went throught a complex brain surgery and a divorce just last year. He needs some time to heal. Been working non stop. He looks better than All the khans at 40. Even if u compare him to to people his age gap he's mile ahead. Arjun rampal, abhishek bachan, saif Ali khan, John Abraham, ajay Devgan and many more in their 40s HR is ageing more gracefully, infact looking better.
Seriously, people found one bad pic of him and are having a party over it

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10

Hrithik Roshan

Roshan

is Hrithik Roshan aging badly? - Page 4

Related Topics

Explore Topics