Why did Saif get national award??? - Page 8

Originally posted by: -Maddy-

😆

Ms 3 Idiots ki deewani... I loved yeh taara woh taara... I actually loved all the songs... and SRK looks GOOOD in that movie...

Originally posted by: BullsEye777

Oh good.. No need to underline unless it is that your normal style of writing😆 I rarely read all the posts and that last para of yours seemed to indicate a different reason for regional films to be given the awards.

Does a NA really make a difference to regional films? Maybe, in the sense that some crackpots like me would try to watch them (but on CDs/TV/online) but as any incentive to the industry , other than pride to the state, the actor and the industry, mostly no.

Originally posted by: -Maddy-

Isn't that subjective... I loved Swades... But i know many who found it a big snoozefest... Similarly, i am sure many would feel that Hum Tum was a better product compared to Swades... They may feel that Saif's performance in HT was better than SRK's in Swades...

Totally agree with your comments abt the regional cinema... Bollywood actors get enough recognition... The regional actors, this is the only way their movies reach out to a bigger audience... A national award makes a huge difference for those regional movies...

Originally posted by: Yankees

Of course it is subjective, it was a big snoozefest. Wannabe Lagaan movie. 😆 SRK was nothing special in it, boring character. Yeh tara woh tara has got to be one of the most annoyings songs on my list, right up there with Uh-Oh jaane-jaana.

Originally posted by: blue-ice

Its always not that subjective either Maddy...sometimes there is a stark difference...So If I say that Katrina was better than Sri in EV, Vidya in kahaani or PC in Barfi...will u consider it as subjective...I don't think so...but on the other hand who was better between Sri, Vidya and PC is totally subjective...just saying subjective doesn't make it right always...No one unless biased towards Saif will say that he was better than SRK in Swades...

Secondly...The National awards are so credible becuase when they award for the best actor/actress its totally based on the performance of the actor...nothing else...The movie can be a snoozefest...doesn't matter...thats why they are different and credible than all the trashy awards like FF or Stardust and what not...so saying that Saif got the award because the members of the jury found him better than SRK is laughable...The jury for Natl. awards is not teen agers or common people...they are experts and they know what they are doing...I can agree that if they choose Vidya over Sri or Sri over PC...its their subjective decision but Saif over SRK...heck no...

Having said that...I know Saif is a very versatile and excellent actor...but that year he DID NOT deserve the award...