Should RANBIR HAVE done JTHJ instead of KING KHAN? - Page 14

Originally posted by: Sandy552

THANKYOU! I was wondering why more people weren't writing about THAT scene. I was so shocked that I turned round to my friend in the Cinema and said did that little brat just say what I think she did?!

Can you image if this was an English/American film - there would be such an uproar. But us Indians are a strange lot - we are racists towards our own kind!!

Originally posted by: Dexterkilaila

I doubt it. The problem with JTHJ isn't SRK (from what I've read so far) its the W*F script, the direction and everything in between. Even with Ranbir, I'm sure the script couldn't be saved.

Originally posted by: pakeezah

***********

Unfortunately, in India, this is the reality. If one took a peek in the matrimonials

guys and girls always askng for fair and handsome fair and beautiful.

It, should nt be but it seems to be...thats why Hindustan Levers Fair and Lovely

and Fair and Handsome cremes flooding the market followed by all the other

cosmetic companies marketing 'fair' creams by the shiploads

@iam4RNAB JTHJ already blockbuster. In India,it is close to 100 crore, Overseas nearly 55.It wil make profit of 70-75 crore!

Originally posted by: Nkapoor3

Komal Nahta ?@KomalNahta

@iam4RNAB JTHJ already blockbuster. In India,it is close to 100 crore, Overseas nearly 55.It wil make profit of 70-75 crore!

Originally posted by: beboholic

No.. why? Srk was said to be the saving grace of JTHJ.. so why replace the saving grace of a bad film?

Originally posted by: beboholic

No his not granny erotic 😡