NY: Good because it deals with an important issue?

roxthefox thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#1
From all the reviews on NEW YORK that I've read, be it from IF members or critics, I deduce that most people seem to gush about this film, not because it was great, but because it dealt with an important issue.

The film does not automatically become entitled to a 5 star rating just because it deals with an important topic. Films have to stand up on their own, for the quality of the film-making, irrespective of whether they deal with religion, politics, family problems, or just a cat-and-mouse chase over a piece of cheese.

While NY's premise is sound (barring the numerous avoidable cliches and plot quirks) and the story are the plot are good, it is in the execution that the film falls apart completely. The direction is the biggest culprit, for the film does no justice to the writer's vision at all. What happened after 9/11 cannot be explained away in some stupid dialogues by Roshan at the end of the movie. In fact, even during the course of the movie, other than the horrifying visual images of the torture of the prisoners, the movie was not able to dissect or delve into what really happened and why.

Ok, I applaud the makers of the film to ATTEMPT at breaking out of the formulaic, masaala movies, and it was a semi-decent attempt, but also has a political blind spot that makes it troubling and not only a bit foolish. It seems like the film suffers from an overload of political views (American's seen as this generations Hitlers, and then Muslims standing up against terrorism to make a better life for all Muslims, and the America being the greatest country in the world, to name a few). The film's themes seem muddled...

But the good part was Johnny Abs! Whoa, who could have thought the he could ACTUALLY act? 😲 He captured the wrath and anguish of being tortured, harassed and molested so well. It was entirely convincing, and heartbreaking. Many have complained that John is expressionless (I did too), but the lack of expressions, particularly in the post-detention scenes, worked in his favor-- a hollow and empty man, with all emotion stripped of him.

Katrina 'wood face' Kaif, was, well as usual, just about as exciting as a wooden plank. I wanted to gouge my eyes out every time she appeared on screen. PLEASE take acting classes. Her scenes were actually more torturous to watch than the detention scenes. 🤢

I would love to comment on Neil's acting, but unfortunately, I could not see him. He was transparent... kinda like Mr. India. Get a tan, dude.

Anyway, sorry to ramble off here. I wasn't trying to offer a review, but just asking, if my fellow ramblers only liked this movie because it tackled an important issue, or did they really think it was good? I guess it doesn't have to be NY in general, but any film that deals with an important issue. I just picked NY because I just watched it!




Created

Last reply

Replies

66

Views

5.2k

Users

26

Likes

113

Frequent Posters

ShadowKisses thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 16 years ago
#2
I liked the movie in bits and parts, not the movie as a whole. As you rightly pointed out, the movie did not delve into the what happened, how it happened and why. It mostly dealt with police brutality and how torture can change a person. I felt it was a bit of cop-out in regards to the topic of 9/11 because the movie didn't really focus on the event, or the effects. I'm still wondering why it was titled "New York" because the city itself is hardly shown. Frankly, it could have been made anywhere -- police brutality is not something that only the Bush-administered America is guilty of.
That aside, I didn't really like New York. The premise was good -- although, it did require a bit of suspension disbelief because of gaping plot holes -- using FBI when officially it would be DHS, Obama's "cancellation" of detention centres etc. The overall performance was not. The conflicted messages of the movie (i.e. Terrorists are victims of injustice, then later, as an attempt of justifying the Patriot Act -- countries sometimes make mistakes) left a confusing impression as to what the director was trying to say. The acting front was salvaged, to an extent, by John Abraham (never thought I'd see the day) and Irfan Khan. I found Katrina passable. Neil, though, was positively horrifying in most of his scenes. I couldn't believe this was the same Neil who actually acted in Johnny Gadar. One more thing that really took away from the movie -- the use of songs and the placement with the movie. It definitely could have been done better.
345162 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#3

The movie was decent enough but only because Bollywood throws complete and utter trash at us 90% of the time. Other than that, there's no redeeming quality. I had a major problem with the screenplay, I felt like they were all patched up together in a hurry, there was no logical transition and the songs completely ruined the experience.

Also, the director wanted the viewers to feel sympathy for the characters, but I honestly did not feel what they were going through because it really was not portrayed properly. The focus shifted so quick from one character to the next that you can't really feel what that particular character is going through. Or maybe the actors did not do their job correctly in the screen time they were given. And Katrina's character had a room for a lot of growth, sadly her character was underdeveloped.
Acting was ok. I agree John did good, but only in few scenes, rest he was as wooden as ever. Katrina improved slightly from her bimbette roles, but not enough for me to sing her praises. I don't know what everyone is talking about. I hardly saw her act, some of her emotional scenes especially when she cries and lays her head on john's shoulder made me laugh a little because it was SOOOOO damn unconvincing.
And Neil has really let me down, the guy was fabulous in Johny Gaddar, here he was something else, much worse.
Irfan was doing what he does best but I feel he is being stereotyped into cop roles and I did not see him bring anything new to the table this time. Although I liked his sarcastic lines in the film. The guy is talented, its sad to see him being given the same roles over and over again.
I'm happy for Neil this movie worked because the dude needs a box office hit desperately. He is better than the Ranbir's and the Imran's so a hit at the box office will go a long way for him. I do understand why people are liking this film so much though. It was the first mega release after the strike with a fairly new subject.....so it worked.
Edited by psychobalehead - 16 years ago
roxthefox thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#4
Shadow kisses and Psychobalehead, I absolutely concur with your points, in particular, with the lack of coherent screenplay. That was my thought exactly.... I didn't feel any sympathy for the characters, save for John's detention scenes. The film didn't really do too much for me...it did not make me reflect on anything that has happened in the last 8 years since 9/11.

Like I said, NY seems to have a confused political ideology. In the first half, you are exposed to the horrors of the Patriot act, detention camps and torture to which many Muslims are subjected to, and how this lead to huge alienation and radical sentiments amongst the Muslim population.

In the second half, these policies are justified by blaming Muslims themselves for alienating themselves from America. By the end of the film, because the Muslims have rectified their ways, America loves Muslims again....so much so that the child of an actual terrorist is the most popular kid in his school. There is even a message in the end on how Obama has closed down the detention centres ...........now we can all live happily ever after.

As for Irfan Khan, I didn't feel him either. John was probably the best thing about the entire film. And while we are on this, what's with Indian filmmakers picking up the worst possible foreign actors for Indian films? Do they think that "white actor" = "good actor by default" for some reason? Every time Roshan's boss opened his mouth, or actually just showed his face, I wanted to cringe and hide under the seat.

roxthefox thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#5
Also, I don't want to limit this discussion to New York only, despite what the title suggests. It is my observation on the desi public, that because a film tackles an important issue, it is automatically hailed as a great film.
345162 thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: roxthefox

Also, I don't want to limit this discussion to New York only, despite what the title suggests. It is my observation on the desi public, that because a film tackles an important issue, it is automatically hailed as a great film.

True that. Taare Zameen Par and Black comes to mind. They were decent films and a good effort from bollywood, but they had their flaws, quite many at that. I still don't understand why every critic hailed it as pathbreaking.
Edited by psychobalehead - 16 years ago
RiyaK09 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#7
Rox, its time that you direct your own film now. PLEASE CAST TC AND SK TOGETHER!☺️
roxthefox thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#8
Black was another rip-off of a Hollywood film, and there was nothing pathbreaking about it. Sanjay Leela Bhansali...*sigh*... let's leave him for another topic. 😉

With regards to TZP, I thought it was a beautiful and moving film, and I found it to be both inspiring and introspective. Dyslexia actually occupies a very small piece of the movie and its message -- that each kid is unique and his/her creative imagination needs to be handled with care by parents, teachers and society.

However, as you pointed out, it wasn't without it's flaws. My main problem with Bollywood is that they have absolutely no clue about the meaning of the word 'subtle'. These films tend to become too preachy. I mean, in the case of NY anyway, you might as well have actors stand infront of the screen, and hold up banners that read 'TERRORISM IS BAD'
Edited by roxthefox - 16 years ago
roxthefox thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: RiyaK09

Rox, its time that you direct your own film now. PLEASE CAST TC AND SK TOGETHER!☺️



I wouldn't want SK to be overshadowed. 😉
RiyaK09 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: roxthefox



I wouldn't want SK to be overshadowed. 😉

Oh no you didnt!

Related Topics

Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood

2 months ago

Panchayat Fame Aasif Khan Health Issue

https://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/web-series/article/panchayat-fame-aasif-khan-shares-health-update-after-heart-attack-23584831

https://www.mid-day.com/entertainment/web-series/article/panchayat-fame-aasif-khan-shares-health-update-after-heart-attack-23584831
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue

1 months ago

The most important takeaway from Saiyaara, my thoughts

Saiyaara reminds us that love—honest, unfiltered, sometimes inconvenient—still has the power to sweep away the cool certainties of logic. I saw...

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Bekind

2 months ago

Love is important: Aditya Roy Kapoor

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1E9qERAVip/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: fazgostoso

4 months ago

Was Deepika good in Singham Again?

She was pretty good. What do you think? https://x.com/lordofbattles8/status/1901296780933050617?s=46

https://x.com/lordofbattles8/status/1901296780933050617?s=46
Expand ▼
Bollywood Thumbnail

Posted by: Briaahna

1 months ago

100cr openers - looks pretty good

I just came to know that animal is in this list , and I am serious . Who would have thought ? And mark this down Prabhas and Vanga another 100cr...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".