My final conclusion - I think Sonali could be lying - Page 7

Originally posted by: kaushikbasu

That is correct in case of sexual violation cases. Here the man has to prove his innocence. Actually what you are saying is not fully true. The voice of the accuser is more weighted than accused. Because sexual harassment can happen between opposite sex or even same sex and by opposite sex I mean even a woman can be accused of sexually harassing a man.

Originally posted by: Chits1

sau chuhe khake billi haz ko chali..when she makes a issue,doesn't feel like a issue..coz of her sleeping around

Burden of Proof

Under most legal systems, an individual making a sexual harassment claim under civil law is required to prove that the illegal and sexually harassing behavior occurred and that it constituted sex discrimination, a violation of dignity or a health and safety hazard. The respondent (the harasser or employer), by contrast, often has no burden of proving that the behavior did not constitute discrimination, a violation of dignity or a health and safety hazard.

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

I find it absurd. Then we can talk about gender discrimination.

It is accuser who should come up with evidence. This is against the principle of innocent till proven guilty

Originally posted by: kaushikbasu

You might find this absurd but this stemmed from the fact that most rape and sexually abused victims could not get justice because the laws in most countries stated "Innocent until proved beyond doubt of being guilty." In most cases there were no eye witnesses and scientifically only thing that could be proved if both had sex, which the accused would bend to have consensual sex. in case of abuses, the person would simply deny. Hence the laws related to sexual abuses was changed to "Guilty until proved innocent".

Originally posted by: hippopotamus

lol

i reject above post. no evidence and more accusations.

Originally posted by: americanexpress

lol ...you have gone so far as to reject even the law because it goes against your rose-tinted lens for Ali, toh meri post kya cheez hai. 😆 Khair.. we can lead a horse to water, but we can't make it drink.

Originally posted by: nikita.h

Hippo please your own advice and be logical. What she does with other people shouldn't matter and if this had been a legal matter then no one would even be allowed to use what she did with Upen or Gulati as a defense for what Ali did