Maya and the Prophecies

FleetingWishes. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
#1

I have had a lot of problems with Beyhadh😆 With character inconsistencies to another few. But I've recently realized how regressive a few elements of Beyhadh are--especially when it's being marketed as a gender-reversal, revolutionary show on Indian TV.

I've always said that Beyhadh is chock full of blatant foreshadowing that's very off putting. Fine one pandit in one episode or two or three but so many in every episode then a plethora of upshaguns all homing in the same point?

Right from the start the show has shown pandits saying that Maya is a kaala saaya. Then there have been the diyas bhujing and so many upshaguns--which CVs must have meant as God's foreshadowing to the people. The pandits--so respected and spiritual--have all said that Maya will bring nothing but pain and blackness to the lives of the people she's involved with.

And here's my problem. I may not follow this faith and my faith may be different but don't all religions and say that your God loves you more than anyone? That you can make mistakes after mistakes and fill a sky with your sins and ask for forgiveness and God will forgive you before a second?

Isn't it also believed that nobody's a criminal until the crime is committed?

Then why, when we in the east are still struggling with superstitions, is Beyhadh showing that all of these superstitions are right?

Do you know how many women are burned alive because some religious cleric tells her family she's impure or a witch?

How many people are murdered because of apshaguns and superstitions and religous clerics be it pandits or maulvis saying or decreeing in the name of the God that these people are criminals or Devil's spawns?

And after knowing all of this Beyhadh incessantly kept showing that superstitions are correct. That if doodh falls and diya goes off then the woman entering your house is a witch or bearer of bad news.

They showed Vandana in fact more influenced by the superstitions than evidence. Saying dialogues like 'yeh apshagun hua hai. Yeh shaadi manhoos hai' were all not realistic but superstitious beliefs.

A huge part of Maya's life was shrouded in these same superstitions. The God she worshipped--His clerics telling her she's nothing but a black shadow, she's cursed, she's vile. How must she feel as a woman? God would never say that. He would never ever judge you guilty until proven. And yet the CVs showed all of this and then actually proved in the leap that follow what pandits or apshauns tell you because these superstitions are right. Their prophecies did come true -- Maya and Arjun's marriage is a hell for him.

But don't they see what impact this have on people who might watch this show and also believe in superstitions? They'll be influenced and affected and go ahead and buy the next apshagun or prophecy that happens in their life.

It is the single most regressive and dangerous aspect of the show.

And the CVs have somehow glorified it.


P.S. Don't bash any character on my post. thank you.

Edited by FleetingWishes. - 8 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

72

Views

4.8k

Users

20

Likes

216

Frequent Posters

Khushi_love thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#2
So totally agree, Rida...Fab post...Infact, I was myself contemplating a post on this topic...
Regressive it is. Totally. In this era n age, to encourage superstitions, is just so regressive.

Astrology as a science does exist. It makes predictions based on planetary positions and exact time n date of birth of a person . But I don't know how much I can believe it.

But absolutely nothing like the nonsense that the Mauritius Pundit was blabbering, that too, just by seeing 2 people praying n reading their palms...

The CVs tried to portray as if Maya was an evil spirit n the divine pundit recognised her n hence berated her...

I would like to ask the CVs here...Would the pundit say the same for a person with a physical illness??...Coz I firmly believe, Maaya ain't evil...She's ill..Very ill.

So to berate a mentally ill person in the name of superstitions n apshaguns is very insensitive...N cruel.


Edited by ---Khushi--- - 8 years ago
KhatamKahani thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#3
Self fulfilling prophecies are inherent in many religious takes upheld by their believers.
While I agree it is not correct and the prophecies themselves have a role in eventual outcome, I disagree on putting it all on the 'bad' superstitions, and that the 'good' religious and godly beliefs do not include them.

What is superstition and what is faith? People will categorize them as much as they feel their own faith and beliefs are not superstitions.

Anyway, back to my point. Self fulfilling prophecies are very much inherent in many religious tales upholding its Deity.
Edited by KhatamKahani - 8 years ago
FleetingWishes. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: KhatamKahani

Self fulfilling prophecies are inherent in many religious takes upheld by their believers.

While I agree it is not correct and the prophecies themselves have a role in eventual outcome, I disagree on putting it all on the 'bad' superstitions, and that the 'good' religious and godly beliefs do not include them.

What is superstition and what is faith? People will categorize them as much as they feel their own faith and beliefs are not superstitions.

Anyway, back to my point. Self fulfilling prophesies are very much inherent in any religious tales upholding its Deity.

What exactly is a self fulfilling prophecy? Also who has the full authority to issue a prophecy? Just because you're a religious cleric can you actually play judge and jury with someone? If any of these people tell you that the woman in your house is a forebearer of only bad luck do you actually go on to believe this person and throw her out? When you also simultaneously believe that God loves His people utmostly and noone's greater in His eye. Noone a sinner or a winner until the moment they die. You never know (speaking in the most relgious terms possible)

I'm not saying that religions don't include superstitions but we're not talking about superstitions here. We're talking about the consequences of some of them. The way so many people behave in the lure of these superstitions and the way they act. All I'm pointing out is that it is wrong to show a person as a black saaya and etc in religious words when you know that it can have an impact on people who do the same to others. And the consequences are vile.
FleetingWishes. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: ---Khushi---

So totally agree, Rida...Fab post...Infact, I was myself contemplating a post on this topic...

Regressive it is. Totally. In this era n age, to encourage superstitions, is just so regressive.

Astrology as a science does exist. It makes predictions based on planetary positions and exact time n date of birth of a person . But I don't know how much I can believe it.

But absolutely nothing like the nonsense that the Mauritius Pundit was blabbering, that too, just by seeing 2 people praying n reading their palms...

The CVs tried to portray as if Maya was an evil spirit n the divine pundit recognised her n hence berated her...

I would like to ask the CVs here...Would the pundit say the same for a person with a physical illness??...Coz I firmly believe, Maaya ain't evil...She's ill..Very ill.

So to berate a mentally ill person in the name of superstitions n apshaguns is very insensitive...N cruel.


Exactly. We all have superstitions because they're deeply ingrained in our culture. Even wearing rings and lockets. Every culture has its own superstitions. But we have to draw a line between harmful superstitions and harmless superstitions. If you wear a locket firm in your belief it's a harmless belief. You're not harming anyone. but if a religious cleric tells you that some xyz person is a witch or devil's spawn or just plan wrong--and you under your superstition--go on and do something vile to that person--it IS WRONG.

And CVs again and again showed this. They used religious clerics and superstitions of people to show that Maya will prove to be a black saaya in Arjun's life and then they showed it to be true. It is a very disturbing thought. What if someone watches Beyhadh and thinks of the same thing with their own family member or someone else?

Also did Maya deserve these confirmed religious indications or vindication? God would never single out among his people like that. We live in 21st century. And we need to be rational above all. And actually dispense with such practices of maligning someone or punishing people based on our superstitions. It's wrong.


thelostgirl thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#6
u know once i had also made a post on the pandt drama
do read it if u have time or u r interested
http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4798044
charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 8 years ago
#7
Not going to talk about the characters of this show because thats a discussion for another time.
This trend to include supernatural elements has nothing to do with faith/religion/superstition but it is a poor attempt at grabbing eye-balls under the category of shock-awe. By putting a flickering diya to show a dear one in danger or showing a crow eating some food to emphasis on the good decisions . The whole point is to tell/spoon-feed the audience towards certain emotion,reaction while trying to push a plot. Read an article by Ekta's writer who very eloquently mentioned how they add such effects to grab eye-balls. What this does is that it normalizes certain beliefs,superstitions and encourage subtly a certain emotion in the society. Now you know that if a diya flickers it means the FL must pray and worry about her guy who will be battling life-death situation.

The reason why such cheap-trp bait stinks here in this show is because the channel and the show makers have marketed it to be a "different, progressive" show. Which means it won't normalize the trp-bait behaviour. Yet, here we are.

Vandana's initial sketch doesn't seem to show that she believed in these abshaguns and what not. But who cares when we need a character to take a bullet so that we might create a trp bait track of bechari bahu and atyachari saas.

The real disturbing tone of this whole show is how these generalizing sweeping superstitions seem to be indicating Maya as the "bad"..who we all know has done objectionable actions , basically being the "Evil". So, show, by associating all those superstition stuff with Maya has normalized the act as well as the superstitions and I shudder to think how this conditioning will impact the viewers . Here it's not about proving the superstitions wrong or teaching Vandana a different mindset but proving how all of those signs were true ..that is where this show immediately joins the types of Gopi show.

That is why shows and channels who proclaim to be "progressive and game changing" , need to realize that giving a subtle wardrobe, using lighter colour tones won't cover the regressive ..it has to be the content, story-telling and the message conveyed to earn that title.


P.S. Only for you and because I am super pissed at this show. You should keep writing here, much more fun.

Edited by charminggenie - 8 years ago
FleetingWishes. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: thelostgirl

u know once i had also made a post on the pandt drama

do read it if u have time or u r interested
http://www.india-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=4798044

Beyhadh has an excessive supply of pandits and propechies.😆 It's irritating after a point how they keep so blatantly foreshadowing a thing and marking someone as a villain.
It's not a fantasy work like harry potter was. It's the real world where people actually believe such things and people and go on to harm others. If your beliefs--and only beliefs and no proof--makes you harm someone or hurt someone or vindicate someone, it's wrong. Period.
thelostgirl thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 8 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: FleetingWishes.

Beyhadh has an excessive supply of pandits and propechies.😆 It's irritating after a point how they keep so blatantly foreshadowing a thing and marking someone as a villain.
It's not a fantasy work like harry potter was. It's the real world where people actually believe such things and people and go on to harm others. If your beliefs--and only beliefs and no proof--makes you harm someone or hurt someone or vindicate someone, it's wrong. Period.


absolutely.
100% agree
FleetingWishes. thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 8 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: charminggenie

Not going to talk about the characters of this show because thats a discussion for another time.

This trend to include supernatural elements has nothing to do with faith/religion/superstition but it is a poor attempt at grabbing eye-balls under the category of shock-awe. By putting a flickering diya to show a dear one in danger or showing a crow eating some food to emphasis on the good decisions . The whole point is to tell/spoon-feed the audience towards certain emotion,reaction while trying to push a plot. Read an article by Ekta's writer who very eloquently mentioned how they add such effects to grab eye-balls. What this does is that it normalizes certain beliefs,superstitions and encourage subtly a certain emotion in the society. Now you know that if a diya flickers it means the FL must pray and worry about her guy who will be battling life-death situation.

The reason why such cheap-trp bait stinks here in this show is because the channel and the show makers have marketed it to be a "different, progressive" show. Which means it won't normalize the trp-bait behaviour. Yet, here we are.

Vandana's initial sketch doesn't seem to show that she believed in these abshaguns and what not. But who cares when we need a character to take a bullet so that we might create a trp bait track of bechari bahu and atyachari saas.

The real disturbing tone of this whole show is how these generalizing sweeping superstitions seem to be indicating Maya as the "bad"..who we all know has done objectionable actions , basically being the "Evil". So, show, by associating all those superstition stuff with Maya has normalized the act as well as the superstitions and I shudder to think how this conditioning will impact the viewers . Here it's not about proving the superstitions wrong or teaching Vandana a different mindset but proving how all of those signs were true ..that is where this show immediately joins the types of Gopi show.

That is why shows and channels who proclaim to be "progressive and game changing" , need to realize that giving a subtle wardrobe, using lighter colour tones won't cover the regressive ..it has to be the content, story-telling and the message conveyed to earn that title.


P.S. Only for you and because I am super pissed at this show. You should keep writing here, much more fun.

GENIE!! OMG I did a little squeal seeing your post. YES YES agree to everything!
Let's say even though TV shows show superstitions as such and show such dramatic, prophetic scenes but even they have categories.
Let's say the acquisition or belief in lucky charms or bad talismans. If shows prefer to show such a thing in the name of grabbing eye-balls while also emulating the behavior of many people who follow such practices they might be encouraging the culture but they're also not causing any damage. A person keeping a lucky charm isn't harming someone else.

Even showing a diya bhujing--if it hints and not points at a person--is fine as a foreshadowing device because it's so deeply ingrained in the TV's substance and is loved by audience. Again the diya's not pointing at a person or causing any harm.

But say you're watching a suspense movie and again and again they show something going wrong and someone pointing at the villain or culprit in your movie. And it's supposed to be a suspense. What is your reaction going to be? And if that person doesn't turn out to be so--you would ask then why such wrong foreshadowing?

Beyhadh has the worst kind of foreshadowing and superstitions aspect. Nobody's wearing talismans or just thinking that something's going to go wrong. because that also is a part of it. But people--religious clerics--are pointing straight-forward at the main character and telling you what will happen, she's the culprit and that she deserves to be alone/left'/etc..

Not only that but then they show Vandana so deeply indulging in her superstitions and apshaguns and then treating Maya in the lure of them. And then they go onto show that these superstitions are true. This is absolutely regressive and wrong because you're encouraging such practices where people burn/throw out/hate/hurt people based on superstitions or cleric prophecies.

If you're so desperate to show prophecies show them in an ambiguous way. The same pandit could've said about the kaala saaya without ever naming Maya or hinting at her. Then you also have the superstition and foreshadowing and all and you also cannot blame a certain person. But this blatant pointing, blaming and vindicating is so wrong.

Just like you said. It's like as viewers we've got no brains and cannot make our own decisions so CVs keep shoving everything down our throats.

It's, as we discussed, the same problem with all sony shows. They're always marketed in a new packaging and as revolutionary and new but have the same core underneath. It's so irritating.

P.S. HAHA Not likely.😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".