TB article-Nandu to misuse the powers of Jagdish in Balika Vadhu!

SPuja

@SPuja

Rocker

25

Posted: 11 years ago

#81

Originally posted by: The_Alchemist.

Anandi could have done one thing here. She should have told Sanchi about J's history or could have told Shiv to tell her. Sanchi would have happily thanked god for being saved and left him . She had such a different opinion on him which was never corrected by anyone including the so called redeemed man who was busy comparing her with his new found love Ganga🤢.

@bold - that was Anandi's mistake during Sa-Ja track, that is where Anandi went wrong. I don't think she told everything about J to even Shiv or Shakhers - even if Sanchi would not listen to her or would not have believed her - at least Shiv had the right to know the man whom his sister was going to be married. At that time even forum members were of the view that Anandi has moved on and she no longer thinks about that past. So what if she had moved on - another girl was going to marry that very guy and the least Anandi could do was to tell the truth about J. Here the problem with creatives is once they show someone as redeemed - all his/her past misdeeds get wiped out (as was evident in Anandi's certificate in court case). What creatives wanted to show is since J has redeemed, his past misdeeds can be hidden from his future wife mostly because the future wife was a bad person (deceiving a bad person is OK).

6

Reply

Quote

Ume Salma Kakal

@sunflower52

Rocker

28

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#82

Originally posted by: tiny15
@sidra perfect reply. even i wish amol doesn't bcum bhagwaan shiv or male version of devi anandi.
wish he also sticks 2 male PAs unlike his papa.
and so on.

Neither Shiv is bhagwan or Anandi a devi.

Mocking & name calling them won't change certain facts about Jagya's past blunders or blaming them on DS upbringing.

Jagya was an adult when he made those blunders not a child.

1

Reply

Quote

Ume Salma Kakal

@sunflower52

Rocker

28

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#83

Originally posted by: krystal_watz
Making mistakes makes a character real. The problem is that Jagya's mistakes/crimes are portrayed as mistakes, while Anandi's ones are given a positive spin.

If her mistakes were given positive spin then how they can be called mistakes now I am 😕.

Reply

Quote

aparnauma

@GoodDoc_2105

Trailblazer

40

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

#84

Originally posted by: SPuja

@bold - that was Anandi's mistake during Sa-Ja track, that is where Anandi went wrong. I don't think she told everything about J to even Shiv or Shakhers - even if Sanchi would not listen to her or would not have believed her - at least Shiv had the right to know the man whom his sister was going to be married. At that time even forum members were of the view that Anandi has moved on and she no longer thinks about that past. So what if she had moved on - another girl was going to marry that very guy and the least Anandi could do was to tell the truth about J. Here the problem with creatives is once they show someone as redeemed - all his/her past misdeeds get wiped out (as was evident in Anandi's certificate in court case). What creatives wanted to show is since J has redeemed, his past misdeeds can be hidden from his future wife mostly because the future wife was a bad person (deceiving a bad person is OK).

Shiv knew about Jagya.He knew that he left Anandi for Gauri. and at the same time they knew that he was not right for Sanchi. Both tried to convince her that Jagya and she are wrong for each other.

Anandi clearly told her that the kind of life she wanted she will not get it with him and Shiv told her that changing herself for JAgya's sake will not work either.

She did not listen then Ira changed her mind wanted to try this proposal.

They all now that Jagya left Anandi for another woman.

While they believed that Jagya has changed they still believed that Jagya was not right for Sanchi and vice versa.

It is Sanchi's stubbornness that she knew the best and Jagya's misguided sense of sacrifice that led to tah.

Why blame Anandi for everything???

Sanchi never believed that her brother was head over heels in love with Anandi and that's why he married her

Why would she believe Anandi or Shiv if they tell that Jagya is the reason for failure of the marriage.

She rightly believed that J wanted a modern educated girl for a wife and that;s why he left Anandi.which was correct in any case

If Jagya had told her then there would have been some credibility to that at least in Sanchi's mind who thought Jagya was too good for the likes of Anandi.

1

Reply

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

39

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#85

Originally posted by: sunflower52

Neither Shiv is bhagwan or Anandi a devi.

Mocking & name calling them won't change certain facts about Jagya's past blunders or blaming them on DS upbringing.

Jagya was an adult when he made those blunders not a child.

so we didn't say he made blunders as child .read my posts.i said he was @ fault. sidra said he was @ fault but gud prsn realizes them & apologises & rectifies & redeems which jagya did. and abt mocking see oders posts who started wat.

why not DS upbringing?? she conditioned him oderwise he always helped her & even saved her from DS's anger many times initially.but after DS started poisoning him against A he behaved badly & that even remained till he grew & came out during gauri phase.oderwise wen both started living 2gether in adulthood he was v.gud 4 her & still helped protected her.

tho i also said @ that time J shud'd enough sense @ that time himself but he got blinded by gauri as A was not compatible even was gud.its also his fault but rembr "talli do hathon se bajati hai"

ppl say A is conditioned like she behaves/ed bcoz she was conditione dby DS & bhago like this. so why not jagya is said abt this??

and

no1 can change their pasts only can accept them & rectify them if possible which jagya tried & still trying by helping oders. but sum ppl started mocking by name calling.

see u 1st wrote marydapurshottam etc.putting blames of nandu's acts on genes saying like pots kiska kai, beta kiska hai & bhai kiska hai ?? is it not mocking??

now jagya has redeemed truly & not shown forcfully redemeed.and even punished by God & he himself blames himself 4 all the faults/mistakes he'd done.so why 2 mock him abt his mrgs or faults etc.etc. was/is he womaniser??was/is he abuser basically??

basically he may b inpulsive & short tempered but not an abuser & womaniser.

Reply

Quote

dolly

@tiny15

Stunner

39

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#86

Originally posted by: sunflower52

If her mistakes were given positive spin then how they can be called mistakes now I am 😕.

+ve spin means shown as not mistakes but her approach was proved rite focefully by CVs.

and wat she meant by this u can see her later posts. i understood wat she wanted 2 say.

Reply

Quote

rohini55

@rohini55

Voyager

16

Posted: 11 years ago

#87

Spuja: agree 100 per cent. Anandi was very vague in the way she dissuaded Sanchi. She tried to impress on the social imbalance and the fact that Jagya was married before rather than what he did in those marriages. Naturally Saanchi was not convinced.

Till today Shiv has not been told the horrors child A was subjected to.

CVs have whitewashed the pasts of both DS and J

====

@bold - that was Anandi's mistake during Sa-Ja track, that is where Anandi went wrong. I don't think she told everything about J to even Shiv or Shakhers - even if Sanchi would not listen to her or would not have believed her - at least Shiv had the right to know the man whom his sister was going to be married. At that time even forum members were of the view that Anandi has moved on and she no longer thinks about that past. So what if she had moved on - another girl was going to marry that very guy and the least Anandi could do was to tell the truth about J. Here the problem with creatives is once they show someone as redeemed - all his/her past misdeeds get wiped out (as was evident in Anandi's certificate in court case). What creatives wanted to show is since J has redeemed, his past misdeeds can be hidden from his future wife mostly because the future wife was a bad person (deceiving a bad person is OK).

6

Reply

Quote

SPuja

@SPuja

Rocker

25

Posted: 11 years ago

#88

I do not blame Anandi for everything. I only pointed out her mistakes. I think Shiv does not know the details - the extent to which Jagya went - he may know that Jagya left Anandi for Gauri and then left Gauri also. Sanchi may not even know that much. Even Shiv did not disclosed to family members what he knows about Jagya. Sanchi had the right to know the truth - Anandi/Jagya should have told her - if she was adamant and refused to believe - it would be her karma.

My resentment is towards this view of creatives that if a person is bad, not telling truth about other persons to him/her is OK. If Sanchi was bad - her trying to get close to her fiance was a bad thing, but her fiance is not wrong even if he gives preference to another woman over her.

5

Reply

Quote

Awfulggt

@Awfulggt

Voyager

17

Posted: 11 years ago

#89

Originally posted by: sunflower52

If her mistakes were given positive spin then how they can be called mistakes now I am 😕.

for example -

After agreeing to marry Sanchi , and after assuring her mother and brother that he "knows what he is doing" , he cancelled his engagement with Sanchi and married Ganga abruptly which was so wrong. But it was shown like J was right.

The way he continued his old habit of comparing the two women in his life, here Ganga and Sanchi was wrong but they showed it like he was right to do such comparisons.

so here , though the characters do blunders, the CV's can still portray it in a positive way if they wish to. Here, these are just two points which I could remember on the spur of the moment. They can do this with any character, any time😆

7

Reply

Quote

Awfulggt

@Awfulggt

Voyager

17

Posted: 11 years ago

#90

Originally posted by: SPuja
I do not blame Anandi for everything. I only pointed out her mistakes. I think Shiv does not know the details - the extent to which Jagya went - he may know that Jagya left Anandi for Gauri and then left Gauri also. Sanchi may not even know that much. Even Shiv did not disclosed to family members what he knows about Jagya. Sanchi had the right to know the truth - Anandi/Jagya should have told her - if she was adamant and refused to believe - it would be her karma.
My resentment is towards this view of creatives that if a person is bad, not telling truth about other persons to him/her is OK. If Sanchi was bad - her trying to get close to her fiance was a bad thing, but her fiance is not wrong even if he gives preference to another woman over her.

A girl trying to get close to her twice divorced fiance can be shown wrong. That twice divorced guy , falling in love with a fourth woman and marrying her dramatically , after agreeing to marrying a third woman was right. 🤢

These are the horrid morals of CV's. 👎🏼

5

Reply

Quote

TB article-Nandu to misuse the powers of Jagdish in Balika Vadhu! - Page 9

Related Topics

Explore Topics