First of like to say Rakhi situation and anupama situation are totally different
Rakhi has has only one child plus Rakhi never lived at joint family .she has support of husband as Father as Father ( not as husband because he has ema ) she Haa support of her mayka .she has chance to complete her education . And she don't have more than one child . Suppose if rakhi would have another child
If rakhi would have two or three children then may be other child kinjal ke jaisa nahi Hota
For eg take barkha .now barkha has two children .Sara and Adhik.adhik is shown cunning and greedy but Sara is shown responsible and caring t
If only mother teaching and giving value can make children nice then both brother and sister like Sara and Adhik would have not off different nature
Human own consciousness also responsible of human nature .unless human has own consciousness no Father no mother no one can install value in person
But I don't believe that rakhi has install discipline in kinjal .but onlybaby sitt kinjal thar she bring mineral water for her bring washing machine for her .kinjal can bring water mineral for herself and she can bring washing machine for herself as she is now adult
And then anupama .she don't have support from anywhere neither physical nor financial .plus she marry at 18 she don't has chance to complete her education .she is only 12 pass. Plus she has three children so looking at anupama situation it is very difficult to install value in three children but as I said human own consciousness is also responsible for how they are
Out of three children samar is shown as better human being than her brother and sister
That means anupama has given value only to samar but not pakhi ahd toshu
No as I told that human consciousness is also responsible for human nature apart from other factors