If people can justify Manjari asking Akshara to get rid of un born baby for the happiness of her son, Abhimanyu, (Manjari is doing everything what she feels right for the love of her son) people should also be ready to accept Akshara doing things for the sake of love for her kids (Abhir and new baby). Both are mothers and both are doing whatever they feel is right for their kids, isn't it?
Why only Manjari is justified and Akshara is blamed? (Manjari and Akshara has similar behaviour traits, both did similar mistakes and are continuing the same)
Why can't Manjari let her son take his life's decisions on his own? Does she think he is not capable of deciding what makes him happy?
He is not a child like Abhir that someone has to guide him, right?
If Manjari thinks Abhimanyu is blind in his love for AK (he is an obsessed lover), does she think staying away from Ak will keep him happy? He was not happy in both the leap and she knows that well. If marrying AK with both the kids makes him happy, why can't she allow him to be happy? Is it basically that he will not be happy or Manjari will not be happy seeing Abhinav-Akshara's child around?
Or does she think, AK will eventually agree to get rid of baby (but in her own words, AK still loves Abhinav, not Abhi) and thats why she will start manipulating Abhir?
Why this marriage for love (with no one's nishani) was not applied while Abhi-Arohi was being forced to marry some time back?
37