Raising questions as Viewers of YHM to Child actor's Parents. - Page 9

Originally posted by: wonderwomanique

Hope this topic is kept on the first page or is made sticky..very important !! Either someone tweet this to all actors n cvs of YHM or cvs ki nazar khud hi padh jaaye when they come to sly spy on the forum.

Originally posted by: mnr123

Main pehle se hi agree to ur post 😛😆

Completely accept with u mayu... So much negativity they creating n it may influence child thinking in real... Leave cvs they r nt bothered but parents how tey letting they child do this,,,

Originally posted by: madhurima.devu

Completely accept with u mayu... So much negativity they creating n it may influence child thinking in real... Leave cvs they r nt bothered but parents how tey letting they child do this,,,

completely agree with you manychildren in industry are given adult type dialogs which should not be given to a child hope cvs pade ise

Originally posted by: ybarfa

completely agree with you man children in industry are given adult type dialogs which should not be given to a child hope cvs pade ise

@mayu1982 I'd like to congratulate you for making this thread. It's much needed. As a woman, I've been ranting about a woman's rights for the past few weeks. I feel that YHM does anything but empower women. Fact is, positivity brings in more positivity. You teach by setting good examples. This show doesn't do this. For the sake of TRPs, all kind of illogical things are being shown and it's being accepted by the audience.

Most people claim that they are Ishra fans, myself included. So, for 3 minutes of Ishra romance every 2 days, we are accepting the mental torture that is being heaped upon us by the CVs. Some critics may ask me "why do u still watch the show then? If u don't like it, then stop." I agree. But sometimes it is hard to let go so part of me lingers round this forum, reading posts, hoping for CVs to find their brains.

I never thought about this show from a child's perspective, which you have done. A few days ago, I wrote a post. One line was on Adi's acting abilities. After posting, I immediately edited it for I realized that the child artist could visit this forum and be affected by my comment. The child is just acting. Whether his parents should intervene about the current track, I can't really comment on that. But I do blame the CVs for the handling of this character. A few observations on the character:

- Adi must be 10-12 years old? He's exposed to the internet, television. He goes to school. Yet he's unable to think on his own? Unless a child is mentally retarded, and I do not mean this as an insult, most children nowadays are really smart. They grasp quickly, and they understand. Even if parents are failing in their roles, values can be gained via observation, good television shows, books, through the internet. Please don't let ur child watch YHM
- Adi has never shown any respect to Raman prior to his current stay in Bhalla house. The child is mostly concerned with his materialistic needs n his selfish mother's plight.
- Adi caused Ama's accident. I never saw any remorse for that. I mostly skipped the accident track so I can be wrong here. Community service didn't help IMHO.
- Adi knew the truth about Ashok. Yet he never told his mother. But he believes his mother when she says that the Iyer sisters have ruined her life. Excuse me, remember Ashok's conversation with Suraj? Remember that Ishita brought ur mother into her home from the kachra she was in??? And Ishita wasn't even in the picture one year ago!!! Common sense, any?
- Now the character is being shown as a manipulative kid. Is the bonding with Raman real?

I honestly cannot connect to this character. I don't understand child psychology but I can differentiate between right and wrong. Everything about this character is wrong, and it is not the child artist's fault. We should all try to remember this when we comment on Adi. As for Ruhi's character, I would defer to the mothers here who think that she's participating in scenes above her age.

As audience, it is our responsibility to object when something wrong is being shown. Whether we like it or not, there are many people who are influenced by TV shows and films. A show which does not empower, focuses on negativity is currently number 2 in India. This worries me. There were other ways to show Adi's redemption which did not include trampling upon a woman's right, providing an unhealthy environment for children, showing a child as evil with no moral compass... Most of u have already commented on all this, so I'll refrain myself. I know that at the end, everything will be alright but did the show really have to go down this route and show all this crazy stuff? I miss the old YHM, which made sense.

The above is my opinion, and is not meant to offend anyone.

Hey Mayu...

Originally posted by: Spero

@mayu1982 I'd like to congratulate you for making this thread. It's much needed. As a woman, I've been ranting about a woman's rights for the past few weeks. I feel that YHM does anything but empower women. Fact is, positivity brings in more positivity. You teach by setting good examples. This show doesn't do this. For the sake of TRPs, all kind of illogical things are being shown and it's being accepted by the audience.

Most people claim that they are Ishra fans, myself included. So, for 3 minutes of Ishra romance every 2 days, we are accepting the mental torture that is being heaped upon us by the CVs. Some critics may ask me "why do u still watch the show then? If u don't like it, then stop." I agree. But sometimes it is hard to let go so part of me lingers round this forum, reading posts, hoping for CVs to find their brains.

I never thought about this show from a child's perspective, which you have done. A few days ago, I wrote a post. One line was on Adi's acting abilities. After posting, I immediately edited it for I realized that the child artist could visit this forum and be affected by my comment. The child is just acting. Whether his parents should intervene about the current track, I can't really comment on that. But I do blame the CVs for the handling of this character. A few observations on the character:

- Adi must be 10-12 years old? He's exposed to the internet, television. He goes to school. Yet he's unable to think on his own? Unless a child is mentally retarded, and I do not mean this as an insult, most children nowadays are really smart. They grasp quickly, and they understand. Even if parents are failing in their roles, values can be gained via observation, good television shows, books, through the internet. Please don't let ur child watch YHM
- Adi has never shown any respect to Raman prior to his current stay in Bhalla house. The child is mostly concerned with his materialistic needs n his selfish mother's plight.
- Adi caused Ama's accident. I never saw any remorse for that. I mostly skipped the accident track so I can be wrong here. Community service didn't help IMHO.
- Adi knew the truth about Ashok. Yet he never told his mother. But he believes his mother when she says that the Iyer sisters have ruined her life. Excuse me, remember Ashok's conversation with Suraj? Remember that Ishita brought ur mother into her home from the kachra she was in??? And Ishita wasn't even in the picture one year ago!!! Common sense, any?
- Now the character is being shown as a manipulative kid. Is the bonding with Raman real?

I honestly cannot connect to this character. I don't understand child psychology but I can differentiate between right and wrong. Everything about this character is wrong, and it is not the child artist's fault. We should all try to remember this when we comment on Adi. As for Ruhi's character, I would defer to the mothers here who think that she's participating in scenes above her age.

As audience, it is our responsibility to object when something wrong is being shown. Whether we like it or not, there are many people who are influenced by TV shows and films. A show which does not empower, focuses on negativity is currently number 2 in India. This worries me. There were other ways to show Adi's redemption which did not include trampling upon a woman's right, providing an unhealthy environment for children, showing a child as evil with no moral compass... Most of u have already commented on all this, so I'll refrain myself. I know that at the end, everything will be alright but did the show really have to go down this route and show all this crazy stuff? I miss the old YHM, which made sense.

The above is my opinion, and is not meant to offend anyone.

excellent explanation n much valid points 👏

truly agreed...initially,i hate adi character but now ruhi is on the list...her dialoues afre too over board...