Complete Non-sense !!!!! - Page 2

the judges of our supreme court are stupid by this logic......🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

the cases must be clearly distinguished ji😊 and yes judging by the recent news I heard that 3 judges in India CHEATED on their ongoing law knowledge exams by taking in chits of notes...I would say I do not have much faith in the judges in india much anymore after hearing such a thing😆

All the judges are cheat, incompetent and rampant corrupt according to our esteemed members....I think this is amount to casting aspersions to the entire legal systems of my Country.....that is India........I am not reporting it....but I think under IF rules casting aspersions on the Indian legal system is allowed.......great and I am sure not even a warning will be issued to such person who does it not once at least three times that I remember......👏

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

the cases must be clearly distinguished ji😊 and yes judging by the recent news I heard that 3 judges in India CHEATED on their ongoing law knowledge exams by taking in chits of notes...I would say I do not have much faith in the judges in india much anymore after hearing such a thing😆

madam u first decide in wht u believe, in law or in morality. sometime whn ur Tapu is proved guilty before law (like murder attempt, robbery etc,), u start defending with other reason, whn she is guilty on moral basis thn u start defending with legal argument. u first decide and thn we can discuss. moral of legal. otherwise u dance from one point to other.

Originally posted by: lamboooji

BREAKING NEWS! BREAKING NEWS!! BREAKING NEWS!!!

All the judges are cheat, incompetent and rampant corrupt according to our esteemed members....I think this is amount to casting aspersions to the entire legal systems of my Country.....that is India........I am not reporting it....but I think under IF rules casting aspersions on the Indian legal system is allowed.......great and I am sure not even a warning will be issued to such person who does it not once at least three times that I remember......👏

mens rea--the presence of guilty mind is a rebuttable presumption taken by court...and i dont think u will be able to rebut it in icha attempt to murder😡😡😡baki australian law kaa toh ab ram hi rakeyyy😆😆😆

Originally posted by: lamboooji

absolutely...........taking a criminal back to one's family only because of she is pregnant is the most laughable, most illogical, more weird argument I have ever encountered........

lambooji unfortunately he has an illogical wierd person in his family!!MAI!!who is going to go googaa over the "waaris"..and thn ichha as usual will treat mai's words as divine sayings and put in her support as well..

I don't get it - why do you guys start attacking SrkLuvr personally whenever she defends Tapu .....

You don't like tapu, she does ..... you criticize tapu, she defends her ..... thats all ok ..... but why do you guys adopt a harsh and condescending tone when speaking to SrkLuvr ..... She seems like a sweet gal ..... i have never read a rude post by her .... just chill.... its just a show

lambooji, i m sure u have not stated all facts to ur lawyer frnd, thats why u got this reply. I belong to the family of .lawyers so pls dont teach me law.. In legal language the facts of the case will be as follows:
vansh was dopey and drug addict, he went to rehab also. A doctor will easily give the statement that such person is already mentally unstable and in a state of mind to harm himself. Thr r hundreds of ppl in india who are not in stable mental state but any ppl talking to them rudely cannot be punished for their suicide.
Secondly, instigating a person to commit suicide means continuosly torturing a person mentally or physically. U can consult ur lawyer frrnd for confirmation here. Or u can ruchika,s real life case which is relateds t the law u r talking abt here. What would be the evidence of torture in this case? Clearly, remember all the episods. If u say here vansh doubted his wife bcoz of taps, then What will they say that taps told vansh on his wedding night abt veer n icha,s past relationship? That will never be considered as torture. And of course thr was no physical torture
thirdly, if court will be shown the video, it will clearly prove that vansh came with a gun and NOT taps, which proves vansh already had an intention to kill someone that day, which is true also. So he can kill himself also, plus the video will show that he was threatening to kill taps. here will come the point of self defence. So the case becomes very weak and in real world scenario taps can easily be proved innocent...

But i know u guys r icha lovers and will never agree with me ... But guys plssss, when u talk abt realistic things like law, get ur facts right, its a tv serial not a reality show, they can show anything

Originally posted by: nidhi3112

lambooji, i m sure u have not stated all facts to ur lawyer frnd, thats why u got this reply. I belong to the family of .lawyers so pls dont teach me law.. In legal language the facts of the case will be as follows:
vansh was dopey and drug addict, he went to rehab also. A doctor will easily give the statement that such person is already mentally unstable and in a state of mind to harm himself. Thr r hundreds of ppl in india who are not in stable mental state but any ppl talking to them rudely cannot be punished for their suicide.
Secondly, instigating a person to commit suicide means continuosly torturing a person mentally or physically. U can consult ur lawyer frrnd for confirmation here. Or u can ruchika,s real life case which is relateds t the law u r talking abt here. What would be the evidence of torture in this case? Clearly, remember all the episods. If u say here vansh doubted his wife bcoz of taps, then What will they say that taps told vansh on his wedding night abt veer n icha,s past relationship? That will never be considered as torture. And of course thr was no physical torture
thirdly, if court will be shown the video, it will clearly prove that vansh came with a gun and NOT taps, which proves vansh already had an intention to kill someone that day, which is true also. So he can kill himself also, plus the video will show that he was threatening to kill taps. here will come the point of self defence. So the case becomes very weak and in real world scenario taps can easily be proved innocent...

But i know u guys r icha lovers and will never agree with me ... But guys plssss, when u talk abt realistic things like law, get ur facts right, its a tv serial not a reality show, they can show anything

finally I get to read real good logic.....😃 👏 !!!