Complete Non-sense !!!!! - Page 4

Originally posted by: nidhi3112

dear rahul,

u guys r sooooooooooo obsssessed with icha that u dont even read the posts by others completely..
First go n read my first post completely only then reply,
after reading my post u ll realise that no where i mentioned that taps shall not be punished. I just metioned that they showed that vansh suicide arrest scenario as non realistic n non sense, but u guys just have to keep adding ur own issues which were not even talked abt in the post and attacking members with sarcastic comments.. Why dont u also reply decently using facts backed by ur point of view rather than just sarcastic comments
No wonder moderators ban such members n then they make a hue n cry abt it.

Now i know one more sarcastic comment will come which will be baseless. But i m not gonna reply to such comment n waste my energy n time.
If u have anything to say logical especially relating to incidents n facts shown in show to give ur opinion and how legal proceedings shall happen then we can discuss and have healthy discussion.
Otherwise, i m not interested in just ur comments with baseless reasons n offensive language to end up fighting with no point.

Rahul r u interested to discuss 😆. if u want to discuss, keep one thing is in mind, if u support Tapu and justify her antics, it will be called constructive discussion and logical explation and if not thn Ram hi rakhe. 😆

Originally posted by: abhay119

Rahul r u interested to discuss 😆. if u want to discuss, keep one thing is in mind, if u support Tapu and justify her antics, it will be called constructive discussion and logical explation and if not thn Ram hi rakhe. 😆

Originally posted by: rahulvaid001

Yar hai toh yeh discussion forum...but when our side is put forward evybdy is offended😆😆😆we come to this forum for fun and have light talks but yahan toh serious discussions ki baarish ho rahee hai...toh bhai open ur umbrellas and run😆😆😆

really yaar, so many law specialist, child psychologist, human mind readers hs been gathered here, with their lambe lambe, expert comments (may be they r doing their homework for future practice), tht its seems we people r uneducated. i dont know why people start these legal and none legal issue,why they r not discussing wht they r seeing. in court a lawyer can play legal game and may justify even a criminal, but it dosnt mean tht he is not criminal. and if people can not take criticism, why they bother to reply the post and thn show, as if they r doing favour to reply us.

dear lord! nidhi ji im with u...im soo outta here!

Originally posted by: abhay119

really yaar, so many law specialist, child psychologist, human mind readers hs been gathered here, with their lambe lambe, expert comments (may be they r doing their homework for future practice), tht its seems we people r uneducated. i dont know why people start these legal and none legal issue,why they r not discussing wht they r seeing. in court a lawyer can play legal game and may justify even a criminal, but it dosnt mean tht he is not criminal. and if people can not take criticism, why they bother to reply the post and thn show, as if they r doing favour to reply us.

Originally posted by: SRKLuvr

dear lord! nidhi ji im with u...im soo outta here!

Originally posted by: rahulvaid001

@ bold...very true...show se zyada sab expert comments mein lagey hue hain😕

chalo yaar good for thm. it will help in their practice. we will be happy to hv our little contribution 😆

din pe din non-sense badhte hi ja raha hai....but giving good food for a hearty laugh too

Originally posted by: rahulvaid001

First of all mam..both Sid and taps are main accused of Ichaa attempt to murder and not vansh's suicide....taps involvement in vansh's suicide is more like a moral crime....but it seems u wish to discuss only those issues with which u r a bit comfortable and very smartly ignored the ichaa's murder attempt which was well planned with all evil intentions in our dear despo's mind...😊

But i also know u guys r despo lovers and will never agree with me....But plsss, when u talk abt show discuss all issues and be realistic, main accusations cant be ignored😉

u r rite that sid & taps r convicted 4 attempt 2 murder.whereas vansh case is abetment 2 suicide & i know it cums under IPC section 306. and vansh came wid gun it"ll b proved but its also known fact that he didn't come 2 murder dracula so in court 1 can easily ask this 2 her that if he'd come there 2 murder her. and abt he point the gun 2wards her then question can b raised that if he'd pointed gun 2wards her then still why did she instigated him 2 point gun 2 himself knowing the mental state of prsn & its not defence of herself but clearly a case of abetment 2 suicide. and if prsn is sensitive or vulnerable like vansh then toh case against dracula is pucca. i think all"ll cum 2 know abt this law wen case"ll b opened in the court!! and its not only that sum ppl've lawyers in their family.1 of my uncle is lawyer though now not practising & 1 of my mom's family frnd's son is lawyer but none told us that dracula can't b convicted 4 abetment 2 suicide!! and that 2 that prsn whos mentally unstable!!i think ppl shud clear their facts.👏