Aamir- I scolded KJO and arjun for AIB roast - Page 16

Originally posted by: blue-ice

Of course consent is important...and Pari didn't want any of the shit ...so suggesting a gang rape on her was of course violent...and I know...u will keep playing with words but this is how I see this...they dragged the name of someone who had refused to be a part of this shit...

Originally posted by: Heisenberg.

I find SRK violent and completely irresponsible, a kid who tried emulating him by dancing to chaiyya chaiyya on top of a train electrocuted himself and died.

NEW DELHI, JULY 18. The desire to imitate Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan singing ''Chhaiyya, Chhaiyya'' atop a running train in the film ''Dil Se'' has cost a 16-year-old Delhi boy his life. While dancing on the roof of a train compartment at Nizamuddin railway yard here with his friends this past week-end he touched a live overhead wire and was instantly electrocuted.

http://www.thehindu.com/2000/07/19/stories/1419218a.htm

Throw SRK in jail, these reckless irresponsible stars have no regard for the health and safety of the audience.

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

So would you agree "consent" is the key operative?

Hey, who wants to get f**ked by 10 men in front of 4,000 people. Parineeti doesn't. No one does really. Only Karan does. That is why only he came at it.

So why is it violent if being f**ked was an option not a mandate?

Originally posted by: Heisenberg.

Why are you avoiding the question?, if you're condemning AIB and holding them responsible for any influence they may or could possibly have on the public, are you willing to condemn SRK and hold him responsible for the death of a teenager who tried to emulate his idol?, since this is a real case of a fan being influenced by a star, if you stick by your logic, then you have no choice but to hold SRK responsible.

The point I am making, is that you can't hold people accountable for the choices that others make.

You allege I am "downplaying" things, all I see is you making a mountain out of a molehill, making an issue out of a non-issue.

Originally posted by: Oblivion111

If only consent was understood in India. Delhi would not be the rape capital and Mumbai would not be second highest.

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

She posted a tweet in support of AIB and deleted it after fans were upset.

Do you know why exactly she wasn't part of the show? Did she actually have a problem with it or was she trying to pander to a fan base that is vanilla? In the press statement where she said why she didn't take part she said because she wanted to maintain a clean image for fans. She didn't say that she personally found the show to be shit.

Who is really forcing her to take a stance which she may or may not agree with?

Originally posted by: Franco

Yeah but instead of going after rapists . Their are lynch mobs after comedians

Originally posted by: fcuff

Speaking of SRK, I dont think he ever sought consent when the movie he produced spoofed Saroj Khan or Manoj Kumar. When saroj was upset, Farah haughtily denied that the spoof was anything to do with her, instead of owning up. People need to get off their high horses, I imagine.

Originally posted by: Franco

Yeah but instead of going after rapists . Their are lynch mobs after comedians

Originally posted by: Franco

Yeah but instead of going after rapists . Their are lynch mobs after comedians