y was karan so blinded by frndshp - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

52

Views

4.7k

Users

16

Likes

90

Frequent Posters

Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: devashree_h

Exactly! I cant understand why people are saying Pandavas did not follow Dharma. Yudi is called DharmaRaj for a reason. He did not leave his Dharma even when he was cheated and punished to an exile. He followed the punishment he was given despite his brother and wife repeatedly telling him to atatck the Kauravas and seek revenge. Despite all of it, he saved Dury and company from Gandharvas by ordering his brothers to save them. When did he follow Adharma?



I consider this last act of his adharm. He didn't act to save his wife, but he acted to save his enemies, who had disgraced his wife.

As for adharm, the Pandavas insulting Karna unprovoked previously - when he had done nothing to earn their enmity - certainly qualified them as adharm. Granted, Yudisthir didn't do it, but Bhima & Arjun very much did. While the Pandavas were civil towards everyone else, they were particularly obnoxious towards Karna, and this was way b4 the game of dice.
bunnylovessunny thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: .Vrish.



I consider this last act of his adharm. He didn't act to save his wife, but he acted to save his enemies, who had disgraced his wife.

As for adharm, the Pandavas insulting Karna unprovoked previously - when he had done nothing to earn their enmity - certainly qualified them as adharm. Granted, Yudisthir didn't do it, but Bhima & Arjun very much did. While the Pandavas were civil towards everyone else, they were particularly obnoxious towards Karna, and this was way b4 the game of dice.


Arjuna respected Karna, Yes he was his arch enemy but the former never hurled unnecessary insults at the later. If you are going by what they have shown in the show, then they've shown a bunch of twisted things. Arjuna took an oath to kill Karna for what he in the sabha. And again. Yudhishtir would have been labelled an adharmi if he would have ordered Arjun or Bheem to raise their weapons against the Kauravas and Karna during the vastraharan, because he was a slave and a slave's dharm was to listen to his master's words. Dharma is a complicated thing, it need not always be pleasant and merry. It can also make you do things you DON'T want to do. Label Yudhishtir as an irritatingly tolerant man I'll agree with you. But call him adharmi I'll have to downright disagree.
devashree_h thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#23

Originally posted by: .Vrish.



I consider this last act of his adharm. He didn't act to save his wife, but he acted to save his enemies, who had disgraced his wife.

As for adharm, the Pandavas insulting Karna unprovoked previously - when he had done nothing to earn their enmity - certainly qualified them as adharm. Granted, Yudisthir didn't do it, but Bhima & Arjun very much did. While the Pandavas were civil towards everyone else, they were particularly obnoxious towards Karna, and this was way b4 the game of dice.



Vrish, but wouldnt according to rules, what he did would still be considered Dharma?

And my question was more to previous poster who specifically mentioned that Pandavas got back in HP for the Adharma they committed in the Sabha. Can laughing at Dury be termed as Adharma for which they paid handsomely?
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: bunnylovessunny

Arjuna respected Karna, Yes he was his arch enemy but the former never hurled unnecessary insults at the later. If you are going by what they have shown in the show, then they've shown a bunch of twisted things. Arjuna took an oath to kill Karna for what he in the sabha. And again. Yudhishtir would have been labelled an adharmi if he would have ordered Arjun or Bheem to raise their weapons against the Kauravas and Karna during the vastraharan, because he was a slave and a slave's dharm was to listen to his master's words. Dharma is a complicated thing, it need not always be pleasant and merry. It can also make you do things you DON'T want to do. Label Yudhishtir as an irritatingly tolerant man I'll agree with you. But call him adharmi I'll have to downright disagree.



For bold - citation needed!!! Arjun was nothing short of the very image of rudeness when it came to Karna. And he had taken an oath to kill Karna @ the rangbhoomi itself, when all Karna did was gatecrash what was a family event and replicate every feat of his. In the Sabha, it was Bhima who announced that he himself will kill the Dhritarashtras, Arjun would kill Karna & Sahadev Shakuni.

I labelled Yudisthir an adharmi for defending those who insulted his wife, not for not defending his wife. He was a slave, fine. But when they were in exile, they were exiles, so they had zero responsibility to liberate Duryodhan or the Kauravas - even their womenfolk - from Chitrasena.
Edited by .Vrish. - 11 years ago
bunnylovessunny thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: .Vrish.



For bold - citation needed!!! Arjun was nothing short of the very image of rudeness when it came to Karna. And he had taken an oath to kill Karna @ the rangbhoomi itself, when all Karna did was gatecrash what was a family event and replicate every feat of his. In the Sabha, it was Bhima who announced that he himself will kill the Dhritarashtras, Arjun would kill Karna & Sahadev Shakuni.

I labelled Yudisthir an adharmi for defending those who insulted his wife, not for not defending his wife. He was a slave, fine. But when they were in exile, they were exiles, so they had zero responsibility to liberate Duryodhan or the Kauravas - even their womenfolk - from Chitrasena.


Again, what they showed in the show is NOT entirely true. There never was a contest to begin with!! (I have clarified my mistake in the comment below. Forgive this stupidity of mine!!) And Yudhishtir did not defend those who insulted his wife in THAT instance. If he did, he would have asked Arjun and Bheem to spare Karna and Duryodhan. But he didn't and that proves that he never forgave Duryodhan and his pals for what they did.
Edited by bunnylovessunny - 11 years ago
srishtisingh thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: .Vrish.




I consider this last act of his adharm. He didn't act to save his wife, but he acted to save his enemies, who had disgraced his wife.

As for adharm, the Pandavas insulting Karna unprovoked previously - when he had done nothing to earn their enmity - certainly qualified them as adharm. Granted, Yudisthir didn't do it, but Bhima & Arjun very much did. While the Pandavas were civil towards everyone else, they were particularly obnoxious towards Karna, and this was way b4 the game of dice.



vrish I know u r much knowledgelable than me but let me try to answer ur question by human psychology. what karna did at rangbhoomi! he challenged arjun at the time of his glory. ofcourse if I would have been there I would not like it(I am not talking abt right or wrong, its abt a human nature) . now nobody knew who will win or who was better but this incident did lower arjun status. when a human gets offended he/she tries to attack at his/ her weakest point.karna was not arjun friend that he will care for his feeling so ofcourse he will try to target his weak spot.
I am not justifying anything here nor giving a verdict but I do consider targetting karna was not because. "karna was a suta", but because they targetted because that "suta was karna"
bunnylovessunny thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: bunnylovessunny


Again, what they showed in the show is NOT entirely true. They never was a contest to begin with!! And Yudhishtir did not defend those who insulted his wife in THAT instance. If he did, he would have asked Arjun and Bheem to spare Karna and Duryodhan. But he didn't and that proves that he never forgave Duryodhan and his pals for what they did.


Oh my GOD!! I'm sooo sorry, there was a tournament. Sorry sorry sorry!!!
Vr15h thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail IPL 2024 Participants Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 11 years ago
#28
Bunny, I'm going by the texts, not the show. Yeah, there was a tournament where Arjun displayed his archery skills, and Drona proclaimed him as the supreme warrior. On this part, the show was actually accurate - Karna challenged this b'cos Arjun had been declared universally supreme, not the supreme amongst the Kurus. Had Drona declared Arjun as the supreme Kuru warrior, he'd have been correct. Even Drona's statement was wrong - even w/o counting Arjun, Krishna was far superior to Arjun, so that wasn't accurate either.

Anyway, my main beef w/ Yudisthir was asking Bhima & Arjun to get the Kauravas released by Chitrasena, and I haven't seen you or anybody give a good reason on why that was dharam.
Posted: 11 years ago
#29
Guys we are just mere humans we cannot debate over such a Gr8 epic the cv's are whitewashing karn's character don't just totally go by it...
God always support the greater good
Here pandavas were following dharm but that doesn't mean that they did not commit some humanly mistakes and karn also was a gr8 man but I guess with a harsh luck. Karna takes rigid vows and doesn't break them even on shri Krishna appeal... and draupadi's insult was bcoz she denied to marry him ..mm just my opinion but I like karna more in mahabharat.. BUT AFTER SHRI KRISHNA .
Edited by angrani - 11 years ago
bunnylovessunny thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 11 years ago
#30

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Bunny, I'm going by the texts, not the show. Yeah, there was a tournament where Arjun displayed his archery skills, and Drona proclaimed him as the supreme warrior. On this part, the show was actually accurate - Karna challenged this b'cos Arjun had been declared universally supreme, not the supreme amongst the Kurus. Had Drona declared Arjun as the supreme Kuru warrior, he'd have been correct. Even Drona's statement was wrong - even w/o counting Arjun, Krishna was far superior to Arjun, so that wasn't accurate either.

Anyway, my main beef w/ Yudisthir was asking Bhima & Arjun to get the Kauravas released by Chitrasena, and I haven't seen you or anybody give a good reason on why that was dharam.


I know I'm sorry and I apologised for my mistake in my comment above and edited the comment I made by slipping an apology there aswell.

Now, back to our friendly banter. Yudhishtir asks Bhima and Arjuna to save the kauravas, INSPITE of the horrible things they did to their wife because he was their brother. It was a brother's dharm to save his brother in need and that is exactly what our oldest Pandava did. He didn't have to, but then that would make him an adharmi. It would also cause great grief to Dhritrastra and Gandhari if something were to happen to their sons and the incident also held Hastinapur's grace in its hands. Duryodhan, unfortunately was afterall the Yuvraj. So the explanation.

Dharma, like I've mentioned earlier, need not always bring with it pleasant consequences. Sometimes your own family will thing of you as a loon and it is humanly impossible to please everyone at the same time. But doing the right thing every time will always bring out justice. If not immediately then eventually for sure. And that is exactly what happened to the Kauravas.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".