Please Close this Topic! - Page 10

Created

Last reply

Replies

167

Views

8.5k

Users

18

Likes

337

Frequent Posters

riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 10 years ago
#91
@Adishakti- Why to look at one side of coin? Why to believe that only women suffered and deserves sympathy ..No one here said that Surya was not at fault...no one here actually said about draupadi marrying 5men...and no one here even pointed to sutputra jaap by her. .I think being a feminist is nice ..but let's not turn blind eye to women's faults saying they were helpless and insult their strength...They equally form the part of the story and each of character you mention women had major role to play in Mahabharat.. Fighting battle is not only fighting war in battlefield...it started much before that..but having said that it doesn't lesson the heroics of Karna,Bheeshma, Arjun and Bheem abs even Abhimanyu..You cannot take their glory away simply under pretext of patriarchal society..
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 10 years ago
#92
Ok even though karna was side character probably many people thought he was important and thus we are talking in Karna forum..
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 10 years ago
#93
Good night everyone. I think topic was light n fun but anyways thanks for interesting discussion.. I hope we can continue our arguments when topic is meant right for it.
amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#94
I am kind of agreeing with everyone, and liking everyone's comments...😆😆

And finally, I have to say this, though I myself made a long post on Draupadi, I think this thread was no where about Draupadi...It was not even about K-D(the doomed one)...😆

It was about a fun post on Karna and Kunti, and her motherhood, then how come, here too Draupadi came in? 😭

The less, we talk about her in this forum, the better...😆
Brahmaputra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#95

Originally posted by: AnuMP

1) She saved the Pandavas in DS. Fact. This was acknowledged by Karna, then by Dury through Uluka in Udyoga Parva. Fact.

Without that rescue, NO JAYA.

2) FACT. G and Dhrisht actually wanted to go to war after Arjun consoled G and then Panchali spoke up. He wasn't consoling hwr. He said DDK will be killed and wanted immediate war. Yudhi wa a the one who said no.

3) FACT. Panchali wasnt venting frustration . She clearly states that she wants Yudhi to act. That is the first time that Bheem is ready to act (even though he speaks up in DS, he actually says Yudhi had the right to do what he did). Till Vyasa came and asked them prepare for war.

4) FACT When Keechak hassled her, she vented frustration. She had Bheem kill Keechak. No turn in events?

5) FACT. G's intentions are ambiguous even to Arjun. But when he speaks to Panchali, he clearly says Kauravas will be killed. How is that consoling?


Anu,
1. I have already edited my previous post. You can cheak that.
2. Krishna evidently was supporting war even before Draupadi spoke. So what she spoke or what she made him agree does not matter. I take it as he consoled her. You take it as something else. That makes no difference as Krishna supported war even before Draupadi spoke. He was certainly not influenced by her there.
3. Read again the first speech of Draupadi, in Vana Parva Chapter 12 or 13. What I said is crystal clear.
4. Keechaka's death made no change in the events happened in the lives of Kurus which is the central theme of Mahabharata. It affected only the life of Draupadi, not even the life any of the Pandavas except that Bheema had to kill him.
5. Krishna's intentions were made clear long before he spike to Arjuna.

REAL FACT - My actual question remains unanswered!!! PROVE THAT DRAUPADI WAS THE HERO OF MAHABHARATA/JAYA. None of the above "facts" you mentioned can prove your claim.
Edited by Brahmaputra - 10 years ago
Sabhayata thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago
#96
@Amrita

Here it

Kunti coming to know about Karna through her spies

And duly reared by her, that child endued with great prowess began to grow up. And after Karna's adoption, Adhiratha had other sons begotten by himself. And seeing the child furnished with bright mail and golden ear-rings, the twice-born ones named him Vasusena. And thus did that child endued with great splendour and immeasurable prowess became the son of the charioteer, and came to be known as Vasusena and Vrisha. And Pritha learnt through spies that her own son clad in celestial mail was growing up amongst the Angas as the eldest son of a charioteer (Adhiratha). And seeing that in process of time his son had grown up, Adhiratha sent him to the city named after the elephant

Regarding the funeral

Not only Karna but funeral of all warriors who died took place after the war ended.In a bulk all together

Vaishampayana continued, "Thus addressed, Kunti's son Yudhishthira of great wisdom commanded Sudharma (the priest of the Kauravas) and Dhaumya, and Sanjaya of the suta order, and Vidura of great wisdom, and Yuyutsu of Kuru's race, and all his servants headed by Indrasena, and all the other sutas that were with him, saying, Cause the funeral rites of the slain, numbering by thousands, to be duly performed, so that nobody may perish for want of persons to take care of them!' At this command of king Yudhishthira the just, Vidura and Sanjaya and Sudharma and Dhaumya and Indrasena and others, procuring sandal, aloe and other kinds of wood used on such occasions, as also clarified butter and oil and perfumes and costly silken robes and other kinds of cloth, and large heaps of dry wood, and broken cars and diverse kinds of weapons, caused funeral pyres to be duly made and lighted and then without haste burnt, with due rites the slain kings in proper order. They properly burned upon those fires that blazed forth with libations of clarified butter in torrents over them, the bodies of Duryodhana and his hundred brothers, of Shalya, and king Bhurishrava; of king Jayadratha and Abhimanyu, O Bharata; of Duhshasana's son and Lakshmana and king Dhrishtaketu; of Vrihanta and Somadatta and the hundreds of Srinjayas; of king Kshemadhanva and Virata and Drupada; of Shikhandi the prince of Pancalas, and Dhrishtadyumna of Prishata's race; of the valiant Yudhamanyu and Uttamauja; of the ruler of the Kosalas, the sons of Draupadi, and Shakuni the son of Subala; of Acala and Vrishaka, and king Bhagadatta; of Karna and his son of great wrath; of those great bowmen, the Kekaya princes, and those mighty car-warriors, the Trigartas; of Ghatotkaca the prince of rakshasas, and the brother of Vaka, of Alambusha, the foremost of rakshasas, and king Jalasandha; and of hundreds and thousands of other kings. The pitri-medha rites in honour of some of the illustrious dead were performed there, while some sang Samas, and some uttered lamentations for the dead. With the loud noise of Samas and Riks, and the lamentations of the women, all creatures became stupefied that night. The funeral fires, smokeless and blazing brightly (amid the surrounding darkness), looked like luminous planets in the firmament enveloped by clouds. Those among the dead that had come from diverse realms and were utterly friendless were piled together in thousands of heaps and, at the command of Yudhishthira, were caused to be burnt by Vidura through a large number of persons acting coolly and influenced by good-will and affection, on pyres made of dry wood. Having caused their last rites to be performed, the Kuru king Yudhishthira, placing Dhritarashtra at his head, proceeded towards the river Ganga."
Brahmaputra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#97

Originally posted by: AnuMP

Also remember VERBAL EXERCISES😆


Where does it say Yudhi instructed her on what to argue and how to get them out.

If that part is not a verbal exercise to minimize Panchali' s role as the HERO, I don't know what is.😆

What he instructed her to do was patently diagusting.

He told her to come there barely clad🤢

Her arguments were hers, the decisions on which boons to ask where hers.

Yudhi did not have brains enough to instruct anyone. He was the same dude who lost the empire yet agian, after she regained it!

He did have a native cunning. Not the same as brains.

Panchali was both boat and driver. If Kauravas, Karna and the poet Vyasa could acknowledge it, I am curious as to the reasons why you will not acknowledge it.

Draupadi's arguments failed to set Pandavas free. It was Dhritarashtra's fear seeing bad omens made him grant her boons, not her intelligent arguments.Even the most foolish woman will choose to set her slave husbands free when she is granted a wish of her choice. So there is nothing exceptional in what Draupadi did. Also I can't believe Yudhi had no barins or he was cunning. In each & every decision he took, there are cleatlr political reasons behind explaining which only be a waste of time for me. After all, he was the son of none other than Kunti. Plus, there is nothing that proves Draupadi was both boat & driver. Where did Karna acknowledge that? I only saw him saying she was the boat which rescued Ps. I can only see what is there, at least in between lines!!!!
Edited by Brahmaputra - 10 years ago
amritat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#98

Originally posted by: Sabhayata

@Amrita

Here it

Kunti coming to know about Karna through her spies

And duly reared by her, that child endued with great prowess began to grow up. And after Karna's adoption, Adhiratha had other sons begotten by himself. And seeing the child furnished with bright mail and golden ear-rings, the twice-born ones named him Vasusena. And thus did that child endued with great splendour and immeasurable prowess became the son of the charioteer, and came to be known as Vasusena and Vrisha. And Pritha learnt through spies that her own son clad in celestial mail was growing up amongst the Angas as the eldest son of a charioteer (Adhiratha). And seeing that in process of time his son had grown up, Adhiratha sent him to the city named after the elephant

Regarding the funeral

Not only Karna but funeral of all warriors who died took place after the war ended.In a bulk all together

Vaishampayana continued, "Thus addressed, Kunti's son Yudhishthira of great wisdom commanded Sudharma (the priest of the Kauravas) and Dhaumya, and Sanjaya of the suta order, and Vidura of great wisdom, and Yuyutsu of Kuru's race, and all his servants headed by Indrasena, and all the other sutas that were with him, saying, Cause the funeral rites of the slain, numbering by thousands, to be duly performed, so that nobody may perish for want of persons to take care of them!' At this command of king Yudhishthira the just, Vidura and Sanjaya and Sudharma and Dhaumya and Indrasena and others, procuring sandal, aloe and other kinds of wood used on such occasions, as also clarified butter and oil and perfumes and costly silken robes and other kinds of cloth, and large heaps of dry wood, and broken cars and diverse kinds of weapons, caused funeral pyres to be duly made and lighted and then without haste burnt, with due rites the slain kings in proper order. They properly burned upon those fires that blazed forth with libations of clarified butter in torrents over them, the bodies of Duryodhana and his hundred brothers, of Shalya, and king Bhurishrava; of king Jayadratha and Abhimanyu, O Bharata; of Duhshasana's son and Lakshmana and king Dhrishtaketu; of Vrihanta and Somadatta and the hundreds of Srinjayas; of king Kshemadhanva and Virata and Drupada; of Shikhandi the prince of Pancalas, and Dhrishtadyumna of Prishata's race; of the valiant Yudhamanyu and Uttamauja; of the ruler of the Kosalas, the sons of Draupadi, and Shakuni the son of Subala; of Acala and Vrishaka, and king Bhagadatta; of Karna and his son of great wrath; of those great bowmen, the Kekaya princes, and those mighty car-warriors, the Trigartas; of Ghatotkaca the prince of rakshasas, and the brother of Vaka, of Alambusha, the foremost of rakshasas, and king Jalasandha; and of hundreds and thousands of other kings. The pitri-medha rites in honour of some of the illustrious dead were performed there, while some sang Samas, and some uttered lamentations for the dead. With the loud noise of Samas and Riks, and the lamentations of the women, all creatures became stupefied that night. The funeral fires, smokeless and blazing brightly (amid the surrounding darkness), looked like luminous planets in the firmament enveloped by clouds. Those among the dead that had come from diverse realms and were utterly friendless were piled together in thousands of heaps and, at the command of Yudhishthira, were caused to be burnt by Vidura through a large number of persons acting coolly and influenced by good-will and affection, on pyres made of dry wood. Having caused their last rites to be performed, the Kuru king Yudhishthira, placing Dhritarashtra at his head, proceeded towards the river Ganga."



Thanks a lot Sabhayata...😊
Brahmaputra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago
#99
Amrita,
I totally agree with your comments on my comment. Hope you have noted that I personally I do not have the opinion that Draupadi was just a mediocre wife of Pandavas. Draupadi was one exceptionl woman, a phenomenal woman, I have no doubt in that. But the problem is generel mindset is so narrow that they cannot accept such a vast, oceanic concept of woman. I am running out of time so that I cannot explain what I precisely mean here. Once you asked me why do I believe Drapadi was one of the most edited characters in MB. One reason is that she is not a woman common minds can understand. So far we have only the Kamyaka vana convo between Drau & Yudhi to have a glimpse of who Draupadi was. I completey agree to the fact that Mahabharata is not exclusively anyone's story. We are to learn nothing is constant, everything undergoes change and what all we crave for are just pictures drawn in water from it. There is no one who is completely victorious. Anyhow, Draupadi being exceptional & phenomenal has nothing to do with the central theme of Mahabhrata. It did not change between whatever happened among brothers, right? So I am not avoiding or neglecting her greatness. What I mean is, in my personal opinion, the beauty of Draupadi is in the fact that she is one independent character !!!! Having very less time to write more on her side. But I am certain that she was a kind of woman who we all are never thought & that is also why I believe her character had been edited as the later poets could not accomodate her depth.
Edit - My previous arguments on Draupadi beung a hero are completely based on what is mostly available about Draupadi today in Mahabharata, not what I think about her. All I can say now is she was exceptional, in all sense.
Edited by Brahmaputra - 10 years ago
Brahmaputra thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: AnuMP

Ok. Lunch break time.

Panchali was an ordinary woman?

Let's compare shall we?

Karna, yes he was given up by his mother. Had a happy childhood and family life. The only tragedy was that because his caste was not known he didn't the ultimate astra. He had a kingdom, was friends with kings. His bio Mom destroyed his peace of mind.

His loyalty to Dury was commendable but then Dury did nothing to betray it, did he?

Daan veer business. Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't he start that as penance to defeat Arjun?

In addition to this he aided and abetted Dury in his schemes to kill his cousins.

He instigated a.brutal assault and NEAR RAPE on a woman.

During the war, he promises to give his WIVES AND CHILDREN to anyone who helps him locate Arjun🤢

Panchali- since I don't believe she popped out of fire, she too was plucked from her home.
Married to 5.
Sent to a wilderness which she had a great part in building into an empire.
Ran the economy of the empire which ran from east to west (current politicians can learn from her)
Lost said empire due to incompetent and irresponsible husband
Assaulted and nearly raped
Gained it back
Rescued hubbies
Showed extreme diplomacy in DS where she clearly says she will not cast blame on U though she during her convo with Bheem in Matsya does just that.
Exiled
War and lost her children
Still forgave Ashwatthama
Through it all, in spite of being let down time and again, she remained faithful to husbands, some of whom at best can be described as waste of space.

How can people who see greatness in Karna's loyalty which was returned in full measure refuse to see Panchali's loyalty which stayed to the end in spite of it being completely undeserved.

How can people who see greatness in Karna's daan, not see Panchali's greatness when she says not a word during the entire peace process and only speaks up when even the 5 villages proposal is rejected?

And the disheartening thing is that it is mostly women! Someday someone should do a psychological study on why women of today will profess admiration for a man who did many wrong thing in addition to some good things, but will ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to acknowledge a woman's greatness.That says more about the said women and their small mindedness than about Panchali.

Since people felt free to call Panchali ordinary, I shall feel free to state this.

If we consider his part in DS an interpolation, Karna is a side character in MB till the war. His part in MB changed absolutely nothing. Without him, the war would have ended 3 days sooner, that's it. No one important would have been spared by his absence.

His character may have popularity and sympathy, but he remains a side character.

He was an ordinary man who never thought beyond his own personal wants

First of all, did anyone say she was ordinary?😲. And Mahabharata is not AC. I am certain that Draupadi was ordinay which made her extraordinary. But that is not because of any evidence you gave. I have my own understanding of her in both ways - from what is written in Mahabharata & also from what is not written. I don't have time to explain all those. All I can say right now is, my view on Draupadi was very narrow till some time before but not anymore. Also, it is better if we remember who began all this Draupadi jaap here, right? Was that really needed? I feel Riti's words were misunderstood & I am sorry to say that was very biased & judgemental. Still, what is the need to pull Karna here? That agains shows you have nothing that disproves my points. How can you even think about comparing Karna with Ddaupadi? I personally believe being ordinary is the most extraordinary thing. We are living in such situations that we forget to be ourselves. We are always under pressure to be someone else to keep going in this world. I don't mean I am different from that. But there is no need to apply same things on Draupadi. She was ordinary. So what? That does not reduce my respect or like for her. She was always true to herself. How many of us are always true to ourselves? Being true to ourself is an ordinary thing, very easy, very simple. But the fact is we simply cannot do that. We always crave for the bigger, the higher, the great,the best. Whether ordinary or extra-ordinary, queen or simple housewife, Draupadi will remain as Draupadi only. So I don't think Draupadi being ordinary will have any effect on people's considerations for her. If people stop liking her, she will lose fake followers is the maximum that can happen. So we will be highly relieved if people can spent a few minutes before coming up with a conclusion that anyone who forget or does not mention Draupadi's name wants to insult her portray her in a bad light. About myself, I don't need to think about Draupadi when I think about Karna. So I will naturally will not mention her name while saying Karna's greatness. That does not mean I neglect her. And I can say nothing if a person chooses to think the other way. There is no point in that.😊
edit - Just noticed the need of a pshychological study. One can also be done on why are people judgemental, blind & biased.
Edited by Brahmaputra - 10 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".