{|SKR- EPIC Distortion- Frustration Thread 4|}DT Nt pg 30/68/76 - Page 69

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

118k

Users

60

Likes

3.5k

Frequent Posters

Vibhishna thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail The Rang- Rasa Cronicles Participant Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
No idea how to interpret today's episode... 😕😕😕
So... according to Siya ke Ram, Ram is not needed to establish righteousness in Lanka. 😆🤪Just Sita's cooking and maybe her cooking classes would be enough

Poor Ravan did not know this and kidnapped her. He could have just invited the trio to Lanka and had a party or something

I sincerely pity the soldiers, servants and guards of Lanka. They seem to have been employed for some sort of target practice for the women living there... 😕 Its funny to see the men controlled and women going on a killing spree to help each other 🤡 🤓

Shliya thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
I seem to have completely lost my connect with the show, sorry to say with starsita it was lost way back. I don't understand why they keep reiterating Ram and sita's divinity by emphasising they r God incarnates. Original Valmiki Ramayan never even mentions about this. It treats them as normal humans who rose to the level of gods. What all appreciation and honour the earned was due to their deeds based on sacrifice they did not owe it to their mere existence.
Sita telling trijata about Ram's divinity is vague as per me. To give screen space to starsita they have changed every bit of story. As a lady Sita suffered a lot in Vatika it was trijata who consoled her as a "mother". The demons who were guards there would initially torture her with their words but seeing her strong will and determination they realised she was not ordinary that she was chastity herself. That's how they came to respect her not bcoz she shad shown them her divine form.

Ramji only help them now !!!
Shivam... thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
Siya ke Ram Is not only the journey of Ram in Sita's Eyes , but also the journey of a fantastic show turned to bullshit and crap
attubaby thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
Shliya agreed totally...somehow i dint lyk the whole idea of ma parvati cmin down and tellin sita bout her divinity n purpose of narayanlakshmi to take human birth...Ram and Sita actions reflected their extraordinariness..it must hv remained lyk dat only..divinity that is reflective in action but tacit in expression...they both r in human form..let them do their leela in their way...makin Sita d medium for presenting the jai vijay story was not desirable..wud enjoy more wid Sita showin her inner strength rather than an informed person bout her own divinity.
deejagi thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
Guys really there should be a limit to Exaggerate. The soft spoken Sita is all rebellious and beams like a politician on stage with a mike and on the other hand Ram is shown vengeance and is ready to kill Vaali not because he has wronged his brother but because he has done a similar crime as Ravan. This looks as if his answer to Ravan. Otherwise how can ram believe in Sugriv's words on the face value and declare to kill him? (not teaching him the right path or lesson but direct death). The Ram who stopped Lakshman from marching to kill Bharat is all set to kill someone's brother without a second thought? Some how I am unable to see the divinity on the faces of both Sitha and Ram instead I can see only pride in Sitha's face and vengeance on Ram's face. and a confused Lakshman.
pal_2010 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
Hi all,
Finally I get a thread of my interest...happy to know that the view on distortion of RAMAYAN is almost same...I am thinking the same ...that's why looking for such thread...and finally got it...
Not me even my 11 year daughter have questions regarding Laxman & Sita's aggression..
Ramayan is part of every house in India, so this type of distortion is not accepted...

Sita was good before exile...but now she is becoming irritating and her behavior is not matched with real Sita...
Laxman's character was so well written in all previous version and STAR is making is worst...
I feel that Ravan and his family is a real hero of this SKR...

naq5 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: deejagi

Guys really there should be a limit to Exaggerate. The soft spoken Sita is all rebellious and beams like a politician on stage with a mike and on the other hand Ram is shown vengeance and is ready to kill Vaali not because he has wronged his brother but because he has done a similar crime as Ravan. This looks as if his answer to Ravan. Otherwise how can ram believe in Sugriv's words on the face value and declare to kill him? (not teaching him the right path or lesson but direct death). The Ram who stopped Lakshman from marching to kill Bharat is all set to kill someone's brother without a second thought? Some how I am unable to see the divinity on the faces of both Sitha and Ram instead I can see only pride in Sitha's face and vengeance on Ram's face. and a confused Lakshman.


confused laxman it is. and i see no brotherly love between ram & laxman. are the cvs intentionally showing this. but why?
Shliya thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
CVS have distorted this serial way beyond repair now. I don't understand what they're trying to accomplish. I've not even come across a single person be it on this forum or Twitter who approves of starsita which I think should be contrary to their interest since they wanted Ramayan to be appreciated from Sitaji's POV.
I've not read valmiki ramayan thoroughly. But so far what I have read, there's hardly ever any direct dialogue between Sita and Lakshman but there's respect always. Whenever she had to talk abt him she did so with high praises.
We have a star Sita here who whenever in prayers is always thinking of her raghunandan and their relationship. But if u see valmiki's Sita her prayers are always about the "three" of them remaining protected and safe.

Starsita is free of shortcomings or so she thinks. Even valmiki's Sita was not free of shortcomings. Being a human she was once overcome with emotion and grew so hysterical that she said extreme harsh words to lakshman when he refused to leave the hut. But in the very next chapters we know she didn't mean any of that. When ravan came in the guise of Brahman and Sita tells him about themselves she again while introducing Lakshman talks highly of him. Had she really thought ill of him she wouldn't have praised him thus. Her anger at that time stemmed from her dear.
But starsita's every rebuke to lakshman feels as if she's sick of him. And what more is she never ever feels about it.
Sita in her days in Lanka often cursed her fate and her ill doing (her harsh words to Lakshman) as being the cause of her misery. When Hanuman came to meet her she even said is it bcoz they r angry at her was saying all that to lakshman that they are neglecting her. Now Sita doesn't believe so she has full faith in them. These words do not show what she feels they would think of her. These words are her repentance and her own appraisal. When Hanuman leaves she sends her greetings to Ram and Lakshman. To Ram there's a single verse to Lakshman there are about 7-8 verses where she extolls his bravery and her pride and admiration of him. She can leave it. There's no need she might just send her greetings in one formal verse. But no she doesn't wish to wait till war finishes off. She wishes to send lakshman as earliest as possible a message from her bhabhi to tell him how highly she thinks of him and that he's always dear to her.
I read an article where an author was interpreting the incident of Agni pariksha. He proposed a question. Why was it lakshman who was asked to build funeral pyre ? It could have been any one, why not Hanuman. But no somebody else might hesitate as they don't wish to hurt Sita ma. So would Lakshman. He would be pained too but then she knows he's one person who would obey her none the less.
Another reason as he wrote could be that if she has to punish herself let be through the person she caused terrible misery by her words and that initiated this ordeal.

The point being Sita lashed out at Lakshman just once and for this she was forever remorseful though her conduct can be justified as she was just acting as a normal wife overcome with grief and fear for her husband's protection. Lakshman is one person she trusts eternally but he refuses to go. So her reactions comes.

But here she so often lashed out at him but does she feel bad no way. She even has silent support of Star Ram for doing. ( no Ram. Sorry ppl no offence but now I can't even relate to this ram.)
Sita haran is one tragic incident in Ramayan. But in Skr when they showed it my reaction was actually like coomon now protect yourself. Ab bachao na as you always used to boast in front of the two. Is this the kind of reaction they wished to invoke. I don't think so !!

RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: pal_2010

Hi all,

Finally I get a thread of my interest...happy to know that the view on distortion of RAMAYAN is almost same...I am thinking the same ...that's why looking for such thread...and finally got it...
Not me even my 11 year daughter have questions regarding Laxman & Sita's aggression..
Ramayan is part of every house in India, so this type of distortion is not accepted...

Sita was good before exile...but now she is becoming irritating and her behavior is not matched with real Sita...
Laxman's character was so well written in all previous version and STAR is making is worst...
I feel that Ravan and his family is a real hero of this SKR...


Pal! It's nice to see you on IF again. 🤗

I agree with everything you said.

In fact, majority viewers of SKR agree that StarSita is the most distorted character in the show and StarLakshman the most underrated character. As for Ram, it is so hard to connect to him. He has become too aggressive, much too human to be an incarnation of Lord Vishnu.
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 9 years ago

Shliya, I agree with you. Sita and Lakshman's relationship in this show is beyond repair. The show being in Sita's POV is no excuse. In fact, since this show is supposed to be from Sita's POV, all of the major relationships in Sita's life should be shown more than they were before. They showed Sita and Janak's relationship so well, but after Baal Kand everything went so downhill. Lakshman was one of the closest people in Sita's life. She once tells her own children Luv and Kush that even before their birth, Lakshman was her child and like her firstborn. That's how much she loved him. In SKR, Sita doesn't give two hoots about Lakshman. In fact, often she looks like she wishes he wasn't there. He's literally the third wheel in this show. Even Ram doesn't seem to care much for his younger brother. For him, only Sita exists and none others in his life matter. SKR's Ram is no maryada puruthotham, as he is so flawed in his behavior and nowadays, even aggressive.

Edited by ..RamKiJanaki.. - 9 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".