{|SKR- EPIC Distortion- Frustration Thread 4|}DT Nt pg 30/68/76 - Page 32

Originally posted by: Arijit007

precap, seeta notices the deerskin wraped arround maarich's waste and ask him about it.

Originally posted by: deejagi

Then they may show that Marich updating Sita about the spotted golden deer in certain part of the forest and tempt her to go with him to fetch one in the absence of Ram & Lakshman who would hav egone to help the sages & villagers from the Asuras attack. So they may skip the Lakshman Rekha scene and make Sita kidnapped while she was busy playing with or chasing golden deer.

Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa

And then, they will find a way to blame Lakshman for Sita Haran.

Originally posted by: deejagi

that's for sure as already Sita has given her verdict that Lakshman's angry act will result in major repercussions and her seventh sense warning turned out to be true 😉. And whom else to blame for not to protect her while his sole job was to save her from harm?

Originally posted by: KrishnaPriyaa

Exactly.
It's all Lakshman's fault you see.
Star Lakshman doesn't get any romance with his MudMila also 😆😆
Anyway, Lakshman is always at fault. I bet that agnipariksha will also be blamed on Lakshman.

Waise, is the Lakshman Rekha not going to be shown?

Originally posted by: Meself

My head is on a roll so Sita here in SKR is a detective as well???? And are they even going to show that golden deer episode or not????

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

I do not like the versions in which Ravan does not touch Sita while kidnapping her, because in my opinion it insults her chastity, as if Sita is chaste only if Ravan doesn't touch her, and the moment he does she is no longer chaste.

Sita is chaste because of her pure thoughts and behavior. She never had inappropriate feelings towards another man except Ram, and that's why she is chaste. Ravan touching her doesn't change anything. These versions in which Ravan "cannot" touch Sita were created by our society in order to justify Sita's chastity despite her apaharan, because in our society a woman is considered impure if she's been touched by another man. That is totally wrong, and Valmiki Ramayana proves it.

In Valmiki Ramayana, Ravan does drag Sita by her hair, and he lifts her up with his hands on her thighs and flings her over his shoulder before placing her on his pushpak vimaan.

Shocking? Yet it is true, and Lord Hanuman himself expresses shock that a patrivrata like Sita could be touched by an adharmi like Ravan without him burning to death, but it is explained to him (I forgot by who) that Sita is a great pativrata, and yet Ravan was able to touch her because she willed it to be so. Does that make her any less chaste? NO. Sita, a form of Adishakti herself, let herself be dragged and kidnapped by Ravan, because for the welfare of the world she had to bring about a situation in which Ravan would commit the biggest sin of his life (kidnapping her) and thus be killed by her husband.

Ravan touching Sita neither degrades her nor destroys her chastity. I hope SKR follows this version instead of the ones that have Ravan not being able to touch her.