Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 11th Sept 2025
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 27
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sep 11, 2025 EDT
KIARA EXPOSED 11.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- BD vs HK 3rd Match, Group B, Abu Dhabi 🏏
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sep 12, 2025 EDT
🏠Caption Writing Contest -Bring Pictures to Life!🏠
Navri and her eternal victimisation
Is it just me or…
MAJOR REVAMP TIME FOR STAR PLUS
HUM JEET GAYE 12.9
Patrama Prem ~ A Gosham SS ~ Chapter 4 on pg 2
The 71st National Film Awards are September 23 in Delhi
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- Pak vs Oman 4th Match, Group A, Dubai🏏
Dear we r not comparing characters...makes r doing that
Remember their promo...mauli ki chhavi mishti aur nandini jaisi creative pari...no one wants to compare but makers r deliberately showing the similarities...so we can't help it
Yes this story is definitely about how one girl realises that life can't always be perfect and planned
She doesn't believe in sparks and attractions and feels love means commitmentWhile the other doesn't believe in commitment at all and thinks love is whrn violins play in the backgroundTheir journeys is to start believing in what they refuted all their livesMishti will realise that life can't be planned and love can come in any form ehile sparks and attraction exist..she will experience that form of loveWhile Pari will realise what true lovr actually means and how important commitment isNow the problem is the EXECUTION !writers have messed up with Mishti's side of the story I feelMishAan should have been based on an emotional connect or there should have been something missing in MishVeer that Mishti's monologues could have pointed outIf writers want to show that MishAan are meant to be as destiny is trying to make them meet then writers have faltered hereCos from what I see Mishti was in a happy commited relation and she was satisfied and never once felt that something was missing and then comes Ruhan with whom again she hasn't had a single scene which was based on an emotional connect, understanding etc. So they are coming across as more of an infatuation rather than anything else...so now her leaving Veer for Ruhan doesn't feel right to me...she will be choosing the less wrong path by leaving him as opposed to sticking with him despite being in love with Ruhan which would have been more wrong...makers have done a very poor job when it comes to Mishti's journey as per meIf we look clearly then they have played the same situation but mellowed it down and reversed the gendersPari is not in love I feel...although at least in her case there is some sort of bonding , emotional connect with Ruhan...this was handled well by the writersBut still she isn't in love yet..it's more of an infatuation I guess...Coz she is yet to learn the true meaning of love and realise the value of commitmentThis will happen after she goes through a heartbreakShe needs a man who believes in love, is mature, carign , understanding and believes in commitmentIt very well could be Arnav but I want soemoen more mature for Pari...Arnav is childish and he himself needs to learn a lot in life.So, yup their plot on paper seemed quite interesting but the execution failed big time as per me
Well Said 👏 .
Originally posted by: sweet_tania
Season 2 reminds me of chalte chalte movie(Shahrukh khan-rani mukherjee ).
In chalte chalte movie , rani mukherjee (priya) 's engagement was fixed with a guy who was just like veer in the movie . Rani was living in greece and had given assurance and commitment to that guy and her family that she will do engagement with that guy once after coming back from india .During her visit to india , she fall for a guy named raj (shahrukh khan) who was nowhere near that guy whom she had given commitment for engagement . For raj it wass love at first site for priya but priya was not ready and going back to greece for her engagement with that guy .on other side raj was not ready to given up on her love so he chased her and accompany her on her journey till her home town greece . At last rani realized her love for shahrukh in movie just before few minutes of engagement and decide to break her commitment and then she got married to shahrukh in movie .Here only difference is mishti got engaged unfortunately before getting time to realize what she feels for ruhaan is above definition of commitment .
Originally posted by: chicksoup
I don't think they ever said Pari doesn't believe in commitment. She just wanted to stay away from love in any form.Emotional connect to Ruhaan - she had him helping out with the bike breakdown and her deal, boosting her confidence.Mishti feels a connection with Ruhaan which cannot be called physical. It is not like she recalls his touch or the kisses. They are more of scary things for her. She has seen the good side of the guy, dealing with her siblings and still wants to push him away, not even wanting him as a friend. It is not physical attraction, I don't understand why people say that. It is just that both feel an invisible bond or connect. The ghabraahat is so much a part of every romantic relationship , where you would wait in anticipation , excitement. That's how a love story goes in real life. They are not jumping at each other to hug or kiss or do any physical act. It is a feeling that is sinking in slowly.Pari is feeling what Mishti and Ruhaan are feeling for each other, at a milder level. That's why it is an infatuation.Veer is a good guy. A girl like Mishti is romantic deep down. He can satisfy her physical needs, but emotionally they are not on the same page. It is unfortunate, but it doesn't always work out. If Mishti succeeds in cutting down her emotional side, and be practical, she is not being true to herself. She needs to explore it and understand it before she rejects that side to her.