Originally posted by: mango_pudding1
yea, every experience is different but I remember that lady's post because she was such a cheerful person and in such sharp contrast to expectation and others experience. part of that was she had accepted herself and her past, living very contentedly and was not afraid of the future.one of my cousin is a psychiatrist and she has lots of patients who approach her when they are thinking of a second marriage. they are afraid if the past will repeat itself and so analyzing a past relationship helps them see if they could have done things differently, what are areas they need to work on for personal growth. blaming the ex for everything does not get them anywhere.we can agree to disagree on this but I don't see mouli as without flaws. yes, she is a good person but I also do think that there were areas in her marriage which may have needed a little tweaking. sometimes it is not about whether a need is irrelevant but if it is relevant to the other person, then the spouse needs to address it head on in order to make a marriage successful.so I agree with you 100% that kunal has a saviour complex. the irony is that mauli herself is a vulnerable woman and has lots of insecurities. if she had let kunal in and let him do some of the heavy lifting, then he would have realized that mouli also needs saving. so was she wrong in taking on everything herself? not necessarily but she underestimated kunal's saviour complex. now is she responsible for kunal's affair? no. those were his actions. but she is responsible for her actions in her marriage because they were the two in it.in every relationship (whether it is friend, family or even colleague), we need to pay attention to a person's emotional needs. we may think it is a simple irrelevant matter but it may not be to someone else.