Originally posted by: Snow_Angel
That's the main problem they want third angle as out and out evil but here she is the main lead...people not able to accept the fact
PARAYI AURAT 13.9
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025 Ban vs Sri Lanka, 5th Match, Group B, Abu Dhabi🏏
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai, 14th Sept '25 Episode Discussion Thread
Tanya was fab today👏🏻
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025 India vs Pakistan, 6th Match, Group A, Dubai🏏
KIARA THROWN 14.9
Two contradictory dialgues in single episode? Aurton se Rude nai hona?
Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 14th Sep 2025 - WKV
When a lie is repeated hundred times…
Katrina won't announce her pregnancy, is she?
Bb top 5 - guess
Prayansh Aransh Anpi FF: Swapnakoodu
Cocktail 2 begins shooting with Shahid ,Kriti and Rashmika!
What happened to Tiger Shroff? Why did he decline?
Which movie is your 1st choice on 2nd October?
Malla and ARS running crime list
Sidvi FF: Chocolate (continued)
Originally posted by: Snow_Angel
That's the main problem they want third angle as out and out evil but here she is the main lead...people not able to accept the fact
lol when I even mentioned any other person name here? so if she is lead or not that none of my business I m here only taking about nandini..sorry unlike you I dont waste time over people I don't give a damn or don't bother to talk about them too
Originally posted by: mamta-salian
Radha was married and elder to Krishna, so is Meera. They both loved Krishna.Krishna Supported and advised Arjuna to kidnap his sister Subhadra. Arjuna was married to Draupadi that time.EMA existed that time also.
Originally posted by: DimpledGirl203
Meera was never married to krishna..it was her fantasy that she thought herself she is married...there is a reason she is called jogan of shri krishnaAnd Radha and Krishna are gods and not humans for u to relate them to humans...Krishna can make take 100s of forms at once to live with each wife and make each feel special and important...can humans do tat?😆(its not gonna be justified here just because Lord Krishna did it..i have my own disappointment theories about him as well which i dont want to discuss here as its very irrelevant😆)and talking about MB...well that was believed to have happened 5000 years ago...we are in 2018...and in India Ema is considered a punishable offence!!!! Draupadi married Arjun not because she loved him but because from the childhood her alliance was fixed with arjun...and fyi Draupadi is considered the Chief Queen of hastinapur and not Subadhra(olden days polygamy was more for a collaboration between two kingdoms)...
In polygamy, all the wives KNOW that their husband has married all of them. Obviously it's not as common now as it was back then.
It's not about being regressive. Its about telling a sensitive topic in the way it should be. I started watching the show for the concept. Everyone knew Kunal & Nandini were going to have an EMA. That's not the problem! The problem is HOW these two have fallen in love. They're bringing in God when there's no need to. It's an affair, Kunal and Nandini are going to go behind Mauli's back - Where does God come from?
I've said this from the start. Anyone who has always had a problem with the core concept of the show, they shouldn't even be watching it! However, criticising the way the story is being told is not regressive. It's the incorrect term completely IMO.
I really enjoyed KANK, Astitva and even whatever I saw of Hasratein. Silsila doesn't touch those shows boldness because they haven't kept it very real'. They've added romantic background music and dialogues to suggest that there's nothing wrong in what they're doing. If they're not doing anything wrong then tell Mauli!
Originally posted by: arshi_asya
Radha was never married to Krishna but she loved him till her last breath and never married in her life. She didn't disturb his life either, such was her true love and devotion.Meera never married Krishna. She just imagined him to be her husband and worshipped him.When Arjuna married Subhadra, Krishna himself advised Subhadra on what to do so that Draupadi accepts her and not get angry. Besides those were times, when polygamy was everywhere. Even then Krishna knew Draupadi would be angry at this and advised Suvhadra on how to please Draupadi. Besides, Arjuna didn't marry Subhadra for love, it was a political alliance set up by Krishna himself to seal the political alliance between Hastinapur and Dwarka on the geounds of family relations and he didnvt want Subhadra to get married to Duryodhan who originally wanted to marry her and Balram was keen on this marriage as he favored Duryodhan very much.None of that fits this particular premise.
Never made a post before here but will say this EMA is an age old concept because there are N number of shows which detailed with the topic...why just hasratein there was a tulsi virani whose husband mihir virani had an affair with mandira and even had a child called Karan...tulsi accepted back mihir and karan became her closest son even closer then her own son's...didnt people watch that show...didnt people love the bond tulsi had with karan...So EMA is nothing new to the audience...Just saying that concept is not the villian here...rest i dont watch the show so no comments on it...