Goodness vs Good judgement - Page 4

Originally posted by: SohaniD

@bold

I completely agree with you here.

During Rift track Ragini was completely misguided by Vasu and totally misjudged Sadha and hold her responsible for her abortion and Ranvir's jail going... The moment the learnt truth, she repent herself ....But on the other hand Alekh was Sadhana's husband.. He knew well sadhna was right, still just to make Vasu happy not only he turned his face from Sadhana, but also misunderstood ... And Sadhana's question to him was also justified..

I also Agree, Ragini and anmol thought they have sympathy towards Sakhi and her child.....From humanity point of view they are correct.. But Sakhi's character she needs big time repentance ..

And she should be supported mentally and financially...But She shoudln't be brought back to Rajvansh house .. there is no need to be pair with Alekh...

This is my POV.

But bani did nice post ... kudos to u ..

thanks...

Originally posted by: Omshanti1111

I feel Ragini also has nothing to do now, except make the Rajvanshs accept Sakshi and thus do justice to Sakshi. Actually, its Vasu's evil doings that everyone has to cover up for now. And the worst sufferer will be Alekh and Khushi, who have to deal with Sakshi. Sakshi was first of all not their choice, but she was brought in by Vasu.

Ragini also has no other way now. But Ragini at least has Anmol and Tammy to share her time with, but Khushi and Alekh will be stuck with Sakshi for good, they have no choice now. For Khushi and Alekh, it will be like a choiceless option and I am pretty sure they will be shown accepting Sakshi with a smile, how much they bleed from inside.😊

I completely agree. Firstly, here people are trying to become great by sacrificing someone else. I completely agree that its not the right way of supporting someone. Why should Alekh accept her because Tarun ditched her. That too , with her being so injust to his family. This is not justice. Sakshi and Tarun made the mistake. They should bear the consequences. This is one clear example showing why Sakshi should have waited for marriage before making this physical relationship. If Tarun would have left her after that, she would have had all other problems, but, not the biggest problem of giving the child his/her father's name. Creatives are sending wrong message. No matter what you do, everything would be fine. Thats not right. Sakshi has been ditched, so, its right to give her support, but, there should be a limit. She deserves no place in Alekh and Khushi's life. She has never thought of anything, but, her love, her kid. Whats the gurantee after marrying Alekh, she would again not turn her back towards Khushi (who would have no direct relationship with her).

Why is it a wrong decision of Anmol and ragini

They did it purely on humanitarian basis ...

Vasu may want Saakshi to stay due to society pressure and her Ego

Alkeh should not make her his wife like just ask her to stay in the house but i will not give you the status of a wife.

He should also tell vasu cl;early that thats my final decision and I shou;ld' be asked or pressurized to change it !

If Alekh would have been in that state, this whole drama of marriage prob wouldnt have taken place. Firstly, the marriage it seems was never complete, still this girl had been living in RV house as DIL. This in itself was ridiculous. Now on top of that, after knowing she was always in love with some other person and is sooooo selfish as a human being(who couldnt leave a single opportunity of using even a child for her purpose), forcing her to be accepted as Alekh's wife. This is simply pathetic. Firstly Ragini was so concerned about Khushi, now she is ignoring her completely. Looking at Saakshi's behaviour so far, in my view she is not the right choice for Alekh and Khushi. In order to give her shelter, they are doing injustice to Alekh and Khushi. Saakhsi could have been given shelter in Naari niketan and if she would change her behaviour, she could always get married to someone. Maybe even Alekh, but, not in this condition. I understand, its just a serial, so CVs can show anything :)

Ragini is not ignoring Khushi she still loves are equally now also,
But yes the state Saakshi is she cannot ignore
Saakshi weither we like it or not is RH parivaar ki and Ragini being the bahu of this house she needs to make sure abt it.

Saakshi herself should tell that she will not want to be a part of this beautiful family and would like to stay at the nari niketan and give her child a life it deserves being a mother who can support her child alone

But the creatives will not do that as they want her to be supported by RH and soa lso give the child a name

Originally posted by: shanti05

Ragini is not ignoring Khushi she still loves are equally now also,
But yes the state Saakshi is she cannot ignore
Saakshi weither we like it or not is RH parivaar ki and Ragini being the bahu of this house she needs to make sure abt it.

Saakshi herself should tell that she will not want to be a part of this beautiful family and would like to stay at the nari niketan and give her child a life it deserves being a mother who can support her child alone

But the creatives will not do that as they want her to be supported by RH and soa lso give the child a name

Ragini cannot ignore Sakshi, and she is very right in providing a support. But there needs to be a line drawn there only.

very good post. i was also shocked hearing one or two dialogues of Ragini. How can Ragini testify that Sakshi was good at heart in the beginning? If she was good at heart she would not have ventured out for a deal to marry Alekh to loot Rajvansh people. If Ragini fall for Sakshi's helplessness and make her stay in the RV house she will be doing great injustice to Alekh. Goodness does not mean that you have to be extremely good with everybody and one should be prudent in making such decision. I feel Ragini took that decision in haste and did not think about Alekh's future. Poor Alekh!

Do u think sadhana would have done what Ragini did for Saakshi
Just a thought wanted to knmow your views?