Correct, Himesh did not support Yogi's song choice and pointed it out very clearly. If Bappida had not supported Koyel's song choice he should also have pointed it out. If he didn't do so, then it seems that he agreed with the song choice. Therefore, when the girl was facing flak from Ashaji for the song choice, shouldn't he have taken some of the responsibility on himself? [/quote]
What if he was not responsible? We do not know this and we do not know what happened during the editing of the show. The focus of the entire show was to garner TRPs by hyping the Himesh vs. Asha argument.
[quote=atria]
Again, the problem seems to be that they were critical to the other contestants. We have already agreed that this is not the way to endear the public. Moreover, this is not the topic of discussion. Where it came to their own contestants, I still feel they were not publicly very supportive of them. [/quote]
Yes, this is not the actual topic of discussion. But, you used the example of Jatin-Lalit and correlated them to Bappida. I was merely countering your example by saying that they WERE publicly supportive of their star contenders.
When Ujjaini performed "Haan maine chukar dekha hai" from Black, they gave full credit to her saying that she was a disciplined and fabulous singer. That is being openly supportive and "non-silent".
[quote=atria]About the fight with Khayyam-- what I remember is, that day, their own contestant Sanchali sang badly. The fight for the green card was between Himani and Twinkle and Twinkle got it, with the judges admitting it had been a narrow decision. Then Adesh started the fight and JL supported them very strongly. That is when Khayyam said 'why did you make me a judge'. The next day, when their own contestant Abhijeet got eliminated, they were again displeased with the decision, but the main fight started regarding someone else's gharana. Earlier also they had fought about Nanu and Debojeet, both from other gharanas. Again, too little attention to own gharana and too much attention to others.[/quote]
I was talking about the time Abhijeet Ghoshal was eliminated due to a poor performance after repeated chances. There JL openly argued with the judgement to SUPPORT their contestant because he was a star contender in their opinion. They went to the Mahaguru's table and were shown arguing heatedly with Khayyam who was highly irritated.
Had Mauli been in Koyal's place, I highly doubt that Bappida would have remained silent.
Going back to the debate - JL's constant support and hype for Abhijeet and the constant chances given to him made the public think he was an overhyped singer especially when others performed better. Their WORDS had an impact on his image especially when he did not deserve the hype.
[quote=atria]
Agreed public voting is a very strange, fluctuating thing. Joyeeta may or may not have got people's sympathy, but she didn't come back finally. Who knows what will happen to Koyel. But Bappida sure didn't improve matters any by his studied silence.
Joyeeta did not come back in the Bramhastra, yes. But, she did return through EMET, which was the point I was trying to make. Her image was not completely tarnished. She even survived a few rounds before being booted due to better competition. Yes, no one knows the future. So by that account we cannot say that Bappida's silence ruined Koyal's image.
As you mentioned, the public is fickleminded. Their memories are short and they will forget who Koyal is, the way many of them forgot about Joyeeta being called a kothewali.
In the end, Koyal will only be able to make her image with her singing.