Paresh Rawal - the best guest - Page 6

Originally posted by: chatbuster

yaar, does mallika have to be the only hot topic now? J/K😆

i think PR wld be thrilled to find he's getting a hot image makeover here😉

Rahul buddy.. ek serious question for you... tune apne janam ke waqt doctor ko bhi debate mein haraya tha kya???😆😆😉

Originally posted by: DAISYRABLE

Adi main bhi kab se yeh pucchna chah rahi thi 😆😉

I hope iska answer my buddy rahul will give in less than three sentences!!!😆😆😆

uss se zyada huya na.. tou i'll sue him !!!😆😆

Originally posted by: adi_0112

Rahul buddy.. ek serious question for you... tune apne janam ke waqt doctor ko bhi debate mein haraya tha kya???😆😆😉

haha... yaar, ab yaad toh nahee. they did not hand out those stars back then😛😆

Originally posted by: chatbuster

haha... yaar, ab yaad toh nahee. they did not hand out those stars back then😛😆

👏 good one...😆😆

Originally posted by: Jaadoogar

Just my perspective, Every debate has time limit. If the debate does not give any conclusion then it is useless. I have not seen any conclusion yet of any debate.

Originally posted by: chatbuster

haha... actually the entire question for me is about negative feedback in public. so the poor office performance appraisals still stand. sorry, no can over-turn it.😆

actually, good that we now find that the celeb's obligation is not towards the contestants. neither is shaan's. in my view, their obligations are more towards the show or the folks who got them there. if we accept that, then the comparison with shaan is more legitimate than the far-fetched laughter might imply, no? if shaan, who has so much music sense, does not find it necessary to offer criticisms in full All-India view, why shld the celeb judges? celebs hain, isliye?

as for brownie points, if we look around here, seems like PR got quite some. he's made a career out of playing that role, surely he knows the strings he is pulling, no? incidentally, as passive viewers, we sure love folks on candid camera, dont we? feel sorry for the contestants/ bakras though.

in any case, it's basic tenet with interpersonal/ communication skills that criticism if negative, shld be specific and narrow, not "acha nahee laga" generalizations. rubbish the office example all you want, but the underlying concepts are the same. in both cases, general negative stmts dont help.

nice also that we now realize that the reviewer/ critique and the celeb judge might have different obligations. that particular analogy does not work anymore, right? given this, MCD ka bull-dozer chalane ka order final karein, reviewer ke office peh?😆

Originally posted by: shadyhtown

Okay another long debate here.

All I will say is, Paresh was not asked to provide advice to contestants. He was simply asked to provide his views/opinion on the song. Just like any member of the audience or any normal non-music person may have been asked. And he gave his honest opinion. Accha laga, nahi laga, sur laga, nahi laga, pasand aaya, nahi aaya, etc. He did not lecture any of the participants on how to improve their singing or the technical aspects.

If any of us were asked for an opinion on the singing, we would say the same - accha laga, ya nahi laga. We wouldn't sugarcoat it or start talking about the tecnicalities. Judge Paresh by the same scale. He's a normal person like any of us.

hmmm, not sure if i understand but is there any problem with long debates? SHLD WE CUT DOWN ON THE DISCUSSION? shld we all find it necessary to have short chatty posts that finally ring up 300 pgs on the meter?😕 also, while we are keeping score, how do we get to the 30% posts mentioned elsewhere- by personalities or by different viewpoints? wld appreciate any clarifications.

as for the rest of it, sure PR's a normal guy like all of us and that's why maybe we like him. we might also all want to slap in our negative feedback in full public view. question still is- is it appropriate? is it?