Paro is justified for trusting shantanu!See why? UPDATED - Page 4

good post Sunara. you certainly helped put out Paro's way of thinking.

Originally posted by: shona_arhilover

This post was very much needed, sunara ... was thinking of making a post myself but will add mine here itself ... will be back soon :)

-----EDITED-----

Rudra asked a question, which I have already read somewhere on this forum. And that is, "You trusted tejawat, and you trusted Laila, what you got...?"

And she yet presented herself as an example. She said "You dont trust anyone, you didnt trusted me too" and then some people have the only purpose to bash her for comparing her with someone like Tejawat and Laila ... But my question is, was Paro any better than Tejawat and Laila when he met her?? Rudra didnt knew she is innocent, he thought she is one of the traitor and he WAS wrong ...

All Paro was asking him to do is, dont repeat the same mistake again. You where right in case of Tejwat, given! You were right in case of Laila, given! But what about her? He was wrong in her case. So why cant she say that when Rudra gave the example of Laila and Tejawat?? But more than this balancing game what bothering her more is, her Major Saab has trust issues, which is not related to any BSD training, but in inculcated in him because of his mother. This is what bothers her.

When yesterday her shoulder slums dejectedly and she said, you dont trust anyone, Major Saab. That moment she was a helpless wife who just wanted her husband to see beyond his mother's treachery, to not judge everyone based on his past, but act smartly.

And we can see what happened now, what he is getting to hear from his senior officer. She just wants him to act wisely, not beating everyone just on the basis on mere suspicion. WE know Shantanu is a bad guy, but what about the Ranawats?? They dont know and then Rudra BEATS a person just on the basis of suspicion . Isnt this insane?? This! Paro is asking him to NOT do this!!'

Well... buT kya kar sakte hai😆 People pity us, I mean the one who understand Paro😆

Latest talk of the town is, what would Paro do if Rudra will giggle and smile at some stranger in front of Paro... But my question is what will Rudra do if one day Paro comes and says she was in friends with benefit relationship with some one in the past ... PAST is the keyword here ...

Ans then we are accused of feminism ... thats really great I must say 👏

And Sunara, who are in search of logic in this fictitious world, you have included everything in your post to satisfy them. Great work!👏 👏

Originally posted by: RRViewer

Agreed Sunara.

I am new to this forum, but watching RR from beginning. From y'day felt bad and thought to make a post on my view and when i about to post it, saw urs, which is exactly wat i felt.

Adding my views too,

In my opinion both Rudra and Paro are much in their character. Coz,

• Paro-Rudra fight - In my POV paro is upset with rudra that he is not trusting shantanu is, just she is much more worried about rudra's behaviour of not trusting any one. its not about that third person shantanu, but its her husband's behaviour which makes her more worried i think. She used to point out to rudra some of his behaviour/habit of leaving food incomplete,she taunted his thought for his mom by putting herself and her situation before seh had with rudra,his behaviour of sometimes being like kid etc., like that she is worried for his habit of not trusting anyone, but she also doesnt mean or want him to trust everyone blindly as she stated that shantanu is also from BSD like him, and she is trusting shantanu as from her point of view there is no single clue to doubt him.

Even in our personal life, dont we suggest few things for our beloved ones which we feel good for them?of course we will not force them, same as Paro is suggesting rudra not to distrust all and she is also not forcing him to say sorry to shantanu right?

I feel all that matters to paro is rudra and his behaviour, not much abt the thrid person.

• Rudra - Being a trained army man and his obersvation towards shantanu, he is right and doing right. but the fact that old jallad rudra is far better than the one now is bit strange for me, because.,

-Old jallad rudra was so strong and doesnt have the fear of losing anyone. but wat sort of man he was, he had nothing to lose so no fear.he was an isolated man from everything and every relation in the world, he was having his own world as he stated , he was running and running from his past without any wish to live the life.
But that thing changed when he fallen in love, and now he has someone to care for him, now he has his family back, he also want to live this moment, that dosnt mean that he has to lose his intelligence.He didnt lose his identity too, after paro's suggestion, he might realized that he was not correct so he felt bad for shantanu and told that to him. At that point of time, it was correct. He considers his beloved ones thought, but at the moment when the gift is changed,it made him to connect the dot and he is back to his form, which is obviously correct and in his character.

And how, being an old jallad rudra wihtout of fear of losing anything without having anyone to lose is better than a perosn with his beloved ones,with wish to live life, with wish to protect his beloved ones without losing his identity and his intelligence?[inspite of considering paro's suggestion, he has his own idea on wat went wrong, that is his identity right?].
Life becomes easy in first case, but the actual life and its satisfaction remains in the second one right?

So, for me both of the characters are well in their form. May be Paro's character is not what we expect in this current world, but i think the character is intended to be like that from CVs, afterall they know more about the character they create.
And feeling bad, few of great writers of this forum who were there few months back was not much seen in the forum. missing them.So i too made up for,sit back and enjoy the show as always.

I am not much aware abt forum rules, hope posting this in ur thread is not an issue. if anything, let me know.