Originally posted by: Rupunzale
He saved her because she is his prime witness...even today he wanted her to come to him because he didn't want Tej to win...remember his dialogue...I will not let you win this time Tejawat...he was still thinking it as his mission...to save his job whereas Paro called out when she saw the gun in-spite of knowing very well that Rudra will stand between her and freedom. My point is Rudra has his personal reasons whereas Paro was selfless. There is a huge difference.
Really??
Rudra had personal reasons because he said in addition to the soldiers memory and hs mission against Tejawat he wanted to save his own rank in BSD because he is right?
He told Tejawat he wouldn't let him win as in he wouldn't let his evil intentions win! It was not an ego battle...clearly Tejawat is wrong and Rudra is right and he js saying he will not let him win this time...!
Let's use the advantage we have as viewers...we know both sides of the story and who is evil and who is right...and think objectively...
Why do you say Paro is selfless...because she saved Rudra's life? Then what Rudra did for her was not for personal reasons either...he was fighting for his mission and soldiers above all...she was fighting for her family and he was fighting for what he thinks of as family!
She has started thinking of him as someone she can trust but the only contention was Tejawat and her belief in him...so just imagine...if she can feel safe with him inspite of the situation...why was that...he inspired that confidence in her that he would save her...it wasn't just duty!
Why does Rudra have to be completely vilified in order for Paros pain to be felt?
They are two characters caught in the circumstances and I think we can feel for both ...!
Coming to your original point that Rudra should not feel betrayed...I am sure you feel Paro should not feel guilty either...
Imagine you trust someone and that person is actually trying to kill you...someone else you think to be the enemy tries to warn you...protects you...yes...even intimidates you in attempts to make you see the truth...you resist all attempts because of your faith...you finally stand in between the person you trust and the person you think js your enemy ...you actually tell the person trying to save you that he is a killer of innocents and one who destroys lives and then you actually physically injure him and go with the evil guy...unknowingly...you simply don't know...
But finally you face the truth that the person you trusted was in fact evil and you almost get killed by him...you escape..You break down...and cry shattered for trusting that guy...who actually took away everything from you...after that storm passes won't you recall the person who was your saviour multiple times and tries to tell you the truth...wouldn't you feel bad that unknowingly you had chosen the wrong side...unknowingly you had alienated the one person who was telling you the facts...
What would a person do in that case...obviously feel bad ...maybe even try to reach out to that person...that's human nature as I understand it...
And the person from whose POV he was always right...Rudra...when he saw that stick in Paros hands after she saved Jim from the bullet...he was disbelieving because for him she has ceased being just a witness...from his POV he can't digest that...that's all there is to it!