unhappy with sagars - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

30

Views

3.5k

Users

11

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#21
They ommitted so many beautiful things. there were chapters in Ayodhya kand where Ram explained the beauty of Chitrakut when he was strolling with Sita. Ram told laxman that they (Ram-laxman) will sport there (even grounds).

A long debate takes place when Bharat asks Ram to accept throne. But they showed this incidents so fast

Edited by coolpurvi - 17 years ago
Shruti11 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 17 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: coolpurvi

They ommitted so many beautiful things. there were chapters in Ayodhya kand where Ram explained the beauty of Chitrakut when he was strolling with Sita. Ram told laxman that they will sport there.

A long debate takes place when Bharat asks Ram to accept throne. But they showed this incidents so fast


yes ramji always answer sita ji qus very sweetly he always understand wat sita ji is ging to ask

and regarding ayodha throne they was many days discussion even they dont show sita ji mother ariving chitrakut with janak then later she told urmila mandavi and shrutkirti to follow sita ji step and to serve kaikey with all respect and love
Kal El thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#23

Originally posted by: mmishra1

After Mahabharat war, they did continue till 221 episode which ended with marriage of Anirudha and Usha(daughter of Banasur. After that Brhma requested shree krishna to leave this form and come back to Baikunth Dhaam then lord rplied that I have to finish some personal stuff like going back to Gokul.

Yes they didn't show Dantwakra vadh. Krishna-leela is much more bigger than any other Avtaar. Since this was lord vishnu's sampoorna avtaar so he said clearly that I am the only supreme power.

I wish Sagar sons could finish SriKrishna and paid tribute to his father.



Why did they leave it incomplete? It seems odd that they went so far and suddenly collapsed! 😕 I mean, there wasn't that much left, compared to what had already been covered. Was it some financial issue? Even if it was, they are back to making historicals and mythologicals again with PRC, Jai Maa Durga and Ramayan. There's no longer any excuse to leave that serial incomplete especially since they even revamped the Krishna serial as Krishna Kathayein on Star Plus. 🤔 A short sequel would suffice. 😊

Edited by Kal El - 17 years ago
coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#24

Originally posted by: shruti_gauri1


yes ramji always answer sita ji qus very sweetly he always understand wat sita ji is ging to ask

and regarding ayodha throne they was many days discussion even they dont show sita ji mother ariving chitrakut with janak then later she told urmila mandavi and shrutkirti to follow sita ji step and to serve kaikey with all respect and love



Ram was so caring. When Sita met Anusuya she told Anusuya that Ram is caring like mother-father.

Laxman use to serve Ram -Sita like a ideal son. Ram, Sita, Laxman used to clearly converse about their thoughts. They shud show more scenes of their conversations. These conversations are full of knowledge n are really inspiring.
Shruti11 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 17 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: coolpurvi



Ram was so caring. When Sita met Anusuya she told Anusuya that Ram is caring like mother-father.

Laxman use to serve Ram -Sita like a ideal son. Ram, Sita, Laxman used to clearly converse about their thoughts. They shud show more scenes of their conversations. These conversations are full of knowledge n are really inspiring.


yes laxman ji consider ram and sita as father and mother thats why laxman ji was so close to sita ji that when ram ji order laxman to take sita ji to forest laxman ji 1 time in his life argue with him
coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#26
Many people say that Laxman never saw Sita's face. I dont believe this. Sita-Laxman were like mother n son. He used to regard Sita as Sumitra during exile because he used to miss his mom.

I think these people misinterpreted the verses

Whether he saw or didn't saw Sita's face is immaterial.
Laxman is a ideal brother n brother in law. Whether he saw or didn't saw Sita's face--this fact doesn't anyway affect his greatness. For me he is the greatest brother -in -law

Edited by coolpurvi - 17 years ago
Shruti11 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 17 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: coolpurvi

Many people say that Laxman never saw Sita's face. I dont believe this. Sita-Laxman were like mother n son. He used to regard Sita as Sumitra during exile because he used to miss his mom.

I think these people misinterpreted the verses

Whether he saw or didn't saw Sita's face is immaterial.
Laxman is a ideal brother n brother in law. Whether he saw or didn't saw Sita's face--this fact doesn't anyway affect his greatness. For me he is the greatest brother -in -law


well that mean that laxman respect sita a lot he consider her as mother but there was still mayada of devar bhabhi releation he always take care of sita from exilehe was great brother in law gr8 brother
coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#28

Originally posted by: shruti_gauri1


well that mean that laxman respect sita a lot he consider her as mother but there was still mayada of devar bhabhi releation he always take care of sita from exilehe was great brother in law gr8 brother


Different scholars of different era n region interpreted Ramayan in different way according to the prevalent social conditions n customs. This interpretation that 'laxman never saw Sita's face' seems to be influenced from the rigid social customs prevalent in the medieval era.
I don't believe this fact. Its immaterial to me. There is so such restriction in our religion. "MANOBHAVA" is more important in determining greatness. He was equally pious minded like his elder bro. He use to see Sumitra in Sita. Laxman is really the greatest brother -in -law.
Edited by coolpurvi - 17 years ago
Shruti11 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 17 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: coolpurvi


Different scholars of different era n region interpreted Ramayan in different way according to the prevalent social conditions n customs. This interpretation that 'laxman never saw Sita's face' seems to be influenced from the rigid social customs prevalent in the medieval era.
I don't believe this fact. Its immaterial to me. There is so such restriction in our religion. "MANOBHAVA" is more important in determining greatness. He was equally pious minded like his elder bro. He use to see Sumitra in Sita. Laxman is really the greatest brother -in -law.


ya i agree with u
Kal El thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#30
Going back to the Krishna discussion, I just read a news article that Sagar Arts is reportedly going to make another serial based on Shri Krishna for the newly launched "Colors (Viacom 18)" channel in collaboration with a new company called Colosceum. Let's hope that, even if they never go back and complete the old serial, they will at least depict the complete story in this new one. 😊

I can't post the article here (it's not allowed) though. Maybe Tellybuzz will post the news soon. 😃
Edited by Kal El - 17 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".