I will never say that no one can live the role of Ram like Arun Govil or Gurmeet, because there are soooo many great actors in the world and should they be given the opportunity, they may also live the role just as well as Arunji and Gurmeet, but I do not think Hritik has it in him to do a devotional role. He is a great actor, yes, and I do enjoy his movies, but Ramayan is different from typical Bollywood movies and I do not trust Hritik to show the soft emotions and devotion of Ramji that is required for the role. He'd make a better Ravan, in my opinion.
As for Lakshman, I don't really think Zayed can do it as well as Sunilji or Ankit, but Lakshman's role is a more fiery tempered one, so who knows?
I agree with Khalrika that Ramayan is not merely a historical story about an ideal King or Queen. It is foremost a religious tale of one of the avatars of Lord Vishnu and Mata Lakshmi, and then it is a historical story. So what if the Sagars goofed up the script in some places? Which director hasn't? But the Sagars are the only directors who show bhakti rasa in their stories and hand pick their actors, not just any popular Bollywood type people. No one has made Ramayan that touched its viewers' hearts like the Sagars did, with both the Old and New version. Sure, both have had its fair share of mistakes, but only the Sagars' Ramayans make me feel like we're actually witnessing the Lord's story on Earth. No Ramayan movie or any other serial has done that to me, and I certainly do not trust some Bollywood movie to do that.
Like Khalrika said, it already seems like Bollywood is spicing up this Ramayan to suit their tastes.🤢 I do not like that one bit. Why don't they just leave our epic alone instead of constantly picking at it?😒 Tales like the Ramayana and Mahabharata should only be handled by capable directors, and I do not find Bollywood to be capable of directing something so holy as one of the greatest epics of India.