Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread-2nd Dec, 2025
FAKE FIGHTS 2.12
FAMILY TREE 3.12
Yrkkh gen 3 feud - new low 📯
🏏South Africa tour of India 2025: India vs SA - 2nd ODI🏏
Dhurandhar - Advance Bookings Open
Tribute To Legacy
What made you guys start watching?
Dr Kaira Chapter Discussions Thread
Rana Daggubati and Dulquer Salmaan disagrees with Deepika’s demands
5000 episodes of YRKKH
Ranveer Singh Apologises
Era defining superstar Vicky Kaushal!
Downfall Of Govinda
🎄 Elves of the Bookshelves 🎄 | BTRC • December 2025
🎅🏼 Santas Of Storyland 🎄Dec 2025 Book Talk
Journalist talks about experience interviewing Kriti Sanon
2nd December episode Discussion thread
🌟Gingerbread Page Turners 🎄BTRC December 2025🌟
The days of friendship and love Season4 SS IshVi RishRee
Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
And all i said was Mandodari and Ravan had a relationship of respect and that Laxman and Sita were not in a hut but a cave when the Khara Dushana battle happened . Dunno what was so controversial about this observations but it sure did not go down well with many .
Originally posted by: nneeiill
@kalapi and koolsadhu
all we r saying that u cannot say PH is showing rubbish just coz it does not matches with the version of ramayan u read or ur beliefs...and the replies to TM initially were very polite..i dont find it offensive or questioning the knowledge of TM..everyone explained why they cant relate to TM's post but i guess TM dint expected that and started using harsh words just to prove their point..
since the show began..no one has accepted anything about the show..so all r used to it..as i said..we have realised that the incidents shown are mentioned in one or the other versions so how can one say confidently PH is wrong and offer corrections unless u r very sure abt it.
and just coz we presented our viewpoint...you ASSUMED we have blind acceptance ?? Is that not wrong...we r not blind followers of this show and nor r we RAVAN haters as u had assumed again...infact here everyone was open abt RAVAN. But ramayan cannot show all that aspect..
If I may, it seems members are very defensive about the PH, it makes me curious why??
but anyway, no one can say anything with confidence dear, but it doesn't mean that one has to accept everything blindly either (as you yourselves said so eloquently in the subsequent para). So, why is it when some members questions some depictions in the show, it then become unacceptable - or said no big deal?? Aren't we allowed the same freedom and TM used her/his freedom to post - it might have been a big deal to the TM...I don't see it wrong to forward a different POV either...to me, a fruitful discussion only happens when members are conducive to different POV and discuss without trying to stop the other person's POV...
Another point to note, many members might have read many versions of RAmayana, then again there are members who haven't read any...why not allow ppl coming with what they have read and their perception of the story to share their view...I actual did find it lacking and the effort was more to stop the TM by asking to quote sources...that aren't nice either, since the poster requesting those weren't referring to his/her sources either. Plus, quoting a Wikipedia, isn't a valid reference for many...
If I may, it seems members are very defensive about the PH, it makes me curious why??
but anyway, no one can say anything with confidence dear, but it doesn't mean that one has to accept everything blindly either (as you yourselves said so eloquently in the subsequent para). So, why is it when some members questions some depictions in the show, it then become unacceptable - or said no big deal?? Aren't we allowed the same freedom and TM used her/his freedom to post - it might have been a big deal to the TM...I don't see it wrong to forward a different POV either...to me, a fruitful discussion only happens when members are conducive to different POV and discuss without trying to stop the other person's POV...
Another point to note, many members might have read many versions of RAmayana, then again there are members who haven't read any...why not allow ppl coming with what they have read and their perception of the story to share their view...I actual did find it lacking and the effort was more to stop the TM by asking to quote sources...that aren't nice either, since the poster requesting those weren't referring to his/her sources either. Plus, quoting a Wikipedia, isn't a valid reference for many...
Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000
I agree neil . But i will tell u what i read ...that egged on by Narad , Ravan mastered the nava grahas and daily stepped on them before ascending his throne . Now Shani has a special place in the nava grahas so he was the only one he kept locked up in the basement of his palace . He was kept in a windowless room and hung upside down ...he was this way till Hanuman freed him . The moment he was freed he looked at Lanka with his vakra drushti . Lanka then had bad days . However his vakra drushti did not affect Hanuman who had achieved self realisation by surrending to his guru ...Ram's feet . So impressed and grateful for his freedom Shani gave him a boon . That whoever worships Hanuman will be free of all troubles in sade saati period . To this day pundits advise those having sade saati to say Hanuman chalisa , stotras etc .
I may be wrong but this is what i know . There may be other versions of course .