Was it a fluke??? - Page 4

Originally posted by: pragati.tankha

Originally posted by: dhakarn

maybe ..........but then why was arhaan irritated and moody and bored.............😕and he was not even looking at AH..........😉and i don't think they were sitting far apart from the rest bec what we saw was edited aversion and only saw the 2 of them in the frame every time.........i mean , we didn't see that they were actually away.............and also when AS won the award they both stood up and clapped hard..........it looked like they were in the same side of their crew but in a different row.........

Originally posted by: Arine_123

<font color="#CC6600" size="2"><font face="Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif">Yes. He was irritated and bored .......may be he was not in a good mood or they fought (well, they fight quite frequently acc. to the media ofc😉Isn't he a good lover??😲</font>😆)!! But they sat quite away from the other casts .......it was clearly visible.That's what i didn't like.</font>

[/
Don't get angry w/ me but I think that it was orchestrated by the POPs. All of the silliness started around the same time this track started. What is the harm in confirming or denying the relationship? The show gets free publicity by hook or by crook. I don't blame the actors because the job involves more than just showing up for the shoot.

Originally posted by: yummimommy

Don't get angry w/ me but I think that it was orchestrated by the POPs. All of the silliness started around the same time this track started. What is the harm in confirming or denying the relationship? The show gets free publicity by hook or by crook. I don't blame the actors because the job involves more than just showing up for the shoot.

Originally posted by: dhakarn

[

i think KN-A marriage was only done to revive kesar.............see if they wanted to revive kesar they could have used any other girl, but then kriya would not have let the marriage happen, bec there KN would be doing the marriage deliberatly and krishna had warned him not to do that deliberately........ but in arushi's case krishna remained silent bec according to him sakthi was saving arushi's life by marrying her as nobody would marry a girl who is left stranded at the mandap(it was not deliberate at all from krishn'a point of view) ...........so no q of krishna calling police as according to him , his brother saved a girl's life from being spoiled.............and pratigya would have stopped the marriage if it was any other girl by calling the police to mandap, but here the bride was her sister and she brutally slapped her and married KN with her consent...............and also as a daughter pratigya couldn't call the police to mandap as she saw her father and family was already humiliated and suffering....... so she was powerless........so the CVs wanted kesar to become strong and they also wanted to show the issue of bigamy and also that its illegal , and also they thought some amout of masala would also do good in the form of sis-sis war, SS-amma planning to get rid of pratigya and all....................so to serve all this purpose the CVs showed KN-A marriage..............now we will see kesar emerging from her shell, KN going to jail for some time, A remaining at TN for separating kriya with the help of amma and SS and all that...................

Originally posted by: pragati.tankha

yaa i agree.......i think cv's wanted to show d issue of bigamy.thats y they showed shakti n arrushi's weing..n by showing this they'll pass d msg that it's illigal n shd b stoped in society............now i hope kesar don't withdraw her cae like b4.......she shd b shown fighting 4 her rights n not only [pratigya and krishna standing 4 her....it won't apeal to viewers it's kesar's problem n cv's shd show her gather courage n fight 4 her rights....than only women get d courage to stand against such things in real life....as woman like pratigya can stand 4 justice but there r many woman like kesar wh don't have d courage 2 fight......

Originally posted by: Harish111

[

I am sorry but I will disagree with you. this show is actually promoting bigamy and not condenming it. Pratigya was show-cased as a strong woman who would not stand for any wrongdoings even for her own family. She was ready to send her brother-in-law to jail even though her whole family was against her. If she now keeps quiet just because her sister is the guilty party, then she is the world's no 1 hypocrite

When a show runs for month, the bigamy will be slowly accepted by everyone including the audience. The show shows that such a thing is possible in society. Even if in the end their is a happy ending, no one is going to remember only the ending. They will instead remember the months and years when Shakti had 2 wives without any problems

So what does the show teach us? That its ok for a woman to marry her stalker?(Pratigya). That if a man(Shakti) molests a woman(Arushi), his punishment is to be married to the woman? Its ok if Star Plus is going after TRPs but at leats they should stop pretending that their soap is about women enpowerment and carries social messages

Originally posted by: pragati.tankha

no.......let me remind u pratigya from d begning is not in favour of this M...........n she keeps telling krishna n whole famlily thats it's illigal........i think cv's r showing it just bz they want woman's who r facing such problem shd get d courage who can stand against such injustice......bz in our society many woman knows about their rights but still they don't have d courage to stand for it..............by showing bigmany issue in d show cv's r trying to pass d idea that woamn's shd not tolrate such things........now lets hope cv''s don't show kesar withdrawing her case as it'll not give courage to such women in our society..........

Originally posted by: dhakarn

i think KN-A marriage was only done to revive kesar.............see if they wanted to revive kesar they could have used any other girl, but then kriya would not have let the marriage happen, bec there KN would be doing the marriage deliberatly and krishna had warned him not to do that deliberately........ but in arushi's case krishna remained silent bec according to him sakthi was saving arushi's life by marrying her as nobody would marry a girl who is left stranded at the mandap(it was not deliberate at all from krishn'a point of view) ...........so no q of krishna calling police as according to him , his brother saved a girl's life from being spoiled.............and pratigya would have stopped the marriage if it was any other girl by calling the police to mandap, but here the bride was her sister and she brutally slapped her and married KN with her consent...............and also as a daughter pratigya couldn't call the police to mandap as she saw her father and family was already humiliated and suffering....... so she was powerless........so the CVs wanted kesar to become strong and they also wanted to show the issue of bigamy and also that its illegal , and also they thought some amout of masala would also do good in the form of sis-sis war, SS-amma planning to get rid of pratigya and all....................so to serve all this purpose the CVs showed KN-A marriage..............now we will see kesar emerging from her shell, KN going to jail for some time, A remaining at TN for separating kriya with the help of amma and SS and all that...................