Were they wrong? - Page 2

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC

Yes Shruthi both Pratigya and Amman were grossly wrong. Infact they should have joined the mob in pushing that thief back towards krishna and should have chanted and encouraged Krishna to beat him harder and harder until the poor chap's death. By stopping Krishna they obstructed the street justice system. Krishna should hve punched Amman as well for obstruction and should have slapped Pratigya as well for aiding Amman for his illegal obstruction on Krishna's street justice mantra.

Originally posted by: nisha2010

shruthi ..............y did pratigya slap angad for wat he did to her in d train...........y didn't she wait for d police............?????

i believe everyone has a right to defend him/herself. In that situation- she was defending her honor and life. if you look at the second time she slapped, she was actually waiting for the police to come but angad crossed limits.

the thief stole valuables that could be returned. he did not threaten krishna or anyone else's life.

In my opinion, fighting for the right thing is fine and every one should do that, but letting your partner down in public - there is no excuse for that. no one should come above your partner - i would never let my partner down lke that.

In my point of view, yes they were wrong. In a countries like Pak & India all this "dont take law into ur hands" looks crap. in our country people hand over the culprits to police & police releases them within few hrs or days. to murder someone is definitely wrong but to beat up a thief like krishna did is not wrong. Why wait for the police. if police & law were so efficient these crimes wouldnt have taken place. I deffinitely have to disagree with you there my friend since no one has the right to treat someone else so brutally.Hitting someone is also taken as an offence.It may seem like crap to you but what they said is right since nobody has the right to take the law into their hands and beat someone else up for what they did regardless of the location.Although the police may not be that efficient but one should let the law deal with such issues.An instead of having the theif beaten up,like Pratigya said,the person whom the theif tried to steal from can punish him with the help of the law.

Originally posted by: anjalisharma200

i believe everyone has a right to defend him/herself. In that situation- she was defending her honor and life. if you look at the second time she slapped, she was actually waiting for the police to come but angad crossed limits.

the thief stole valuables that could be returned. he did not threaten krishna or anyone else's life.

y is it then d ppl who r responsible for sexual harrassment left by d law after paying a petty fine .............??

I am surprised by some of the responses here. are people really putting the relationships/ marriage above what is right and what is wrong. (i just wanted to add in that even Bhagvad Gita shows that standing with the right is more important than the relationships). just like charity begins at home, so does the justice. i commend Pratigya's behavior to take a stand with what is right. also, Krishna needs to learn that beating up/violence is not the answer.

I agree it is petty to fight over a pickpocket's situation in the middle of the road and in front of the crowd.

Originally posted by: suk4

yes i agree with u.

I think its a shame that the lovely restaurant scene has been spoiled by this stupid scene.

I don't get what the cv's are trying to show here, but for a husband and wife to fall out over the doings of a pickpocket is ridiculous, and for Pratigya to publicly support Aman rather than Krishna was also pathetic. If this show is supposed to be about a strong woman with clear beleifs and principles, where are they when her marriage is concerned? how coud Prats still have such faith in the police after all she had to endure before her marriage and again with Angad?

Originally posted by: nisha2010

shruthi ..............y did pratigya slap angad for wat he did to her in d train...........y didn't she wait for d police............?????

that was because he was misbeahving with her directly,he wasn't eve teasing someone else now was he?

Originally posted by: yemi3006

its too soon for objectivity Shruthi 😆.......

justified or not, right now most are operating on pure emotions ......

if Aman was hell bent on stopping Krishna, he should have found some other way to appeal to him without insulting him... seems on the show Krishna is always getting insulted by family whether he deserves it or not ....which we've come to expect .......

but for lawyerwa to do it?

I agree that he did cross the line by saying that Krishna deserved to be beaten up but wasn't that after Krishna showed agression from his side.I don't get it,if Krishna becomes agressive it goes down well with the audiance but if someone else is agressive be it through words or actions they immediately start pointing out there mistakes,why is that so?has this fan crze thing come to such a level where one even tends to forget what is right and what isn't?😕

Originally posted by: shruthiR

that was because he was misbeahving with her directly,he wasn't eve teasing someone else now was he?

so she wudn't hav slapped him if it was one of her frns................😲