The argument that since Krishna does not know about the kidnapping , technically speaking Pratigya is not LYING at all is indeed a classic defense of Pratigya .😆 . So Long as the other person does not even know that something has happened related to him [ coz Krishnas tattoo was used in the kidnapping to create a BIG misunderstanding ] it is ok to conveniently keep the facts from him and that it seems is not LYING but EXERCISING A CHOICE [ of course . To Protect The family as an add on . I married the stalker to protect the family .I kept the facts of the kidnapping to protect the family .This Add on is so convenient to be used in the future to cloak immature , irresponsible decisions .]
There is a story in the Mahabharatha about Yudhishtir , the eldest Pandava who was known for his Truthful nature .His Glory was that he NEVER lied in his life . So In the Mahabharatha war , when the rumor was circulated purposefully to weaken DRona , that his son Ashwathama was dead , Drona , not knowing what the truth was , went to Yudhistir , confident that HE wud never lie although he was in the enemy camp . He asked him , is this true ? Did my son die today ?
Yudhistir answered YES loudly and in a very low tone said ........NAROVA KUNJAROVA ........meaning , the human or elephant [ there was an elephant named Ashwathama too ] I dont know . To Keep Yudhistir's vow of truth intact so TECHNICALLY he should not lie , Krishna had an elephant called Ashwatyhama killed .
Drona tottered away , after hearing the YES . Trained By Krishna , YUdhistir was technically 'saved' from LYING .
The Gods did not see it that way . During his last journey to death , He was made to stand outside the gates of heaven and made answerable for this LIE .
There is no technicality in this honesty and lying business .It is a matter of the soul ..........and thats the reason Pratigya was instinctively uneasy about it . If She was technically so NIRDOSH why that quaver of uneasiness ? Why the blunt statement YEH THEEK NAHI HAI ?
Answer is simple.........COZ verily , truly , it WASN"T THEEK . She was right FOR ONCE . Very right . She shud NOT have listened to her father .Did she consult her father before calling the police ? She told her surprised father after the police arrived that I called them . Well She shud have shown how grown up she was by going straight to the Adda and telling Krishna the full truth .
Why wud she care IF the marraige broke ?she doesn't love Krishna anyways .....not even after knowing he was not behind the kidnapping . He was sumone fORCED upon her by tragic fate , right ? So why care ? Let It break ! Good riddance to bad rubbish ! Good riddance to the man who caught her throat , tried to rape her , involved her in a lie ! This was the PERFECT opportunity to get rid of him .......a god given one !
Why didnt the Sherni have the guts to question her father Dad , what marraige r u trying to save ? I dont really have one !It was a bad marraige from day one ! To save something , something has to exist , we never had anything on any level ! So U know what , I dont care if he breaks the marraige , Im gonna tell him the truth ! If he Kills Angad thats his problem and btw , it will be beneficial for us and Arushi !I have nothing to lose !
I wud really admire her then . But she admits to her mom that inspite of the kidnapping being cleared , Im still not in love with him and perhaps may never be . And then agrees to her Dads request !
Krishna lied to make Sajjan Singh happy in his own immature way . What is the purpose of this lie ?She is not intending to go back and make him happy at all , she will 'need time' to come around ! So why lie ?
When the lie comes out will she tell a public gathering that HE my father , MADE ME LIE ? Oh no , she is sanskaari ! One of the sanskaars is lie till you are blue in your face but protect the dignity of your elders !
But where the dignity of your husband is concerned , strip it naked in public ! That is no sanskaar ! Give examples of holy fires and how wrong it is to lie in front of them !
The marraige holy fire and the mantras that it seems one hardly even understands .............taking a vow verbally there that I will give my husband happiness forever ......it is ok to manipulate tHAT HOLY fire with excuses like .........ummm........The priest said the mantras !Not Pratigya ! Or ......does Krishna the unpadh know the meaning of the mantras ? So how r u blaming Pratigya for toying with the mantras ? Now that vow before that holy fire was taken but NOT observed and NAFRAT is my AGENDA was revealed on suhaag Raat Night !
So Selective principles , selective stands against lying and ah ! Selective Holy Fires ! In front of some she justttt cant lie , in front of some she can ! And when fires r not there , she totally CAN LIE ! Technically she is safe and technically holy fire is not there baba !
😆😆😆
.