TV actress Nia Sharma called Sonakshi & Daisy 'gigantic women - Page 14

Originally posted by: nalinidj

I will always defend Sonakshi and Vidya because I like them, and I believe that they are very attractive, pleasantly plump or skinny, but I do get what you mean.

I will wish for them to answer the same way Katrina answers when asked about Elli - "who is she? I don't know her." Classic and classy answer - question the other's existence or popularity or importance with guile and cleverness.

Originally posted by: ruky786

Oh no no, I hope you didn't feel my post was pointing towards you! :) I was speaking from earlier references to threads. And OMG. Imagine that eh? I would love that!

Originally posted by: --Mischievous--

I am totally against what this lady has said... She is beyond ignorant... But did they redefine "huge" and "gigantic" in the dictionary or in Bollywood because when I saw Daisy Shah recently on Dance India Dance, she is quite normal.. In fact, I think she is more on the slimmer side than voluptuous currently.. Yes, she was a more curvier girl BEFORE..(NOT NOW) and carries a little flab on her arms.. But so does many actresses like Kareena Kapoor, Alia Bhatt, Sonakshi, Huma Qureshi, Vidya Balam, and many more... She is no where near "huge" or "gigantic"... I wouldn't even call her a big women currently... But that doesn't mean that if she was more voluptuous I would mind... I think all body sizes and shapes on women are gorgeous and women should be able to carry themselves without being told that they are too big or whatever... The women she mentioned in her article have talent and they look a million bucks when they are onscreen...

Nia Sharma must be REALLY insecure and have some sort of disorder for calling her "gigantic"... She isn't... Yeah, she isn't as stick thin as Nia herself which is probably why she is making such comments to make herself feel better, but she is nowhere near what you call "fat" or "huge" or "gigantic"