Why they are making samrat a villain?

After watching yesterdays episode, i want to bang my head somewhere...

Why they are telling/making samrat a villain or criminal?

Even though he dont like rasam, he accepted to do it when they complied him... Didnt he??

Even he told urmi need rest too, after three days of rasams.. No one told to tell so... But he did

Ok i know he is not romantic and straight forward... So what..It seems he is only earning member in his family... I have seen many people like him who are almost like samrat...

He didnt lie, he didnt act sweet, he is like this only from beginning to everyone..

I can understand urmi bcoz he is opposite of her imagination or image she created in her mind bcoz of her family n ishaan.. She will need some time to understand him.. I can understand her feeling ( i wont accept bucket of tears)...

But Trisha.. Seriously guys.. He commented on her dress and said to her that his life will go according his plan and this marriage will happen.. thats it.. forgive me if i missed like any other argument btw them..

Out there lot of people, have this opinion abt girls dress.. Even though i wont accept it... But it is the fact.. Jansi is small town.. there it is common...

In real, if someone misbehaved with u, u will just slap him with hand or slipper(depends) and walk away from there... or drag him by collar to police(extreme)... But we wont create scene in a road and by shouting and traffic ( its extreme)

If someone tries to stop my marriage before two days... I will try to make it possible by nook and crook ... He didnt follow any non-ethical way to solve it yaar...

If she said he is not suitable for soft urmi and they are polar opposite... Thats the fact

But telling he is not a good man... This marriage wont give anything except regret is some extreme and unnecessary words... But by seeing ishaan, she said he is good for urmi, did she had any interaction with ishaan before( i dont remember anything like that)..

the character of samrat before wedding was not negative .he was a typical self made workholic man with a lot of ego .he was used to get what he wants by hook or crook .thats his character .

I think they shud stop making all this of him keep him the way he was..arrogant...I wud stop watchinh this show if they make him neg nd plzzz for godsake make urmi a strong person..no crying nd all all the time..

Originally posted by: bhagyathara

the character of samrat before wedding was not negative .he was a typical self made workholic man with a lot of ego .he was used to get what he wants by hook or crook .thats his character .

but on wedding day he was just opposite of his character with his socalled drunk friends .when his friends misbehaved with his saali he didnt even respond .and the bachelor party put some light on his morals .i havnt seen a dailysoap hero dancing like this before on his bachelor party.

on wedding day he looked more like villain than hero

Originally posted by: ananyasuri111

I think they shud stop making all this of him keep him the way he was..arrogant...I wud stop watchinh this show if they make him neg nd plzzz for godsake make urmi a strong person..no crying nd all all the time..

Originally posted by: risingsea101

I already banged my head 😆

I feel Samrat's character is supposed to be the angry young man type, but they went overboard like they broke the anger machine or something

Originally posted by: bhagyathara

the character of samrat before wedding was not negative .he was a typical self made workholic man with a lot of ego .he was used to get what he wants by hook or crook .thats his character .

but on wedding day he was just opposite of his character with his socalled drunk friends .when his friends misbehaved with his saali he didnt even respond .and the bachelor party put some light on his morals .i havnt seen a dailysoap hero dancing like this before on his bachelor party.

on wedding day he looked more like villain than hero

I think til now its okay but lets see hw they take it further as I think he is tooo handsome for a villain...nd I really dont want every episode to be sad

Originally posted by: qwerty012

After watching yesterdays episode, i want to bang my head somewhere...

Why they are telling/making samrat a villain or criminal?

Even though he dont like rasam, he accepted to do it when they complied him... Didnt he??

Even he told urmi need rest too, after three days of rasams.. No one told to tell so... But he did

Ok i know he is not romantic and straight forward... So what..It seems he is only earning member in his family... I have seen many people like him who are almost like samrat...

He didnt lie, he didnt act sweet, he is like this only from beginning to everyone..

I can understand urmi bcoz he is opposite of her imagination or image she created in her mind bcoz of her family n ishaan.. She will need some time to understand him.. I can understand her feeling ( i wont accept bucket of tears)...

But Trisha.. Seriously guys.. He commented on her dress and said to her that his life will go according his plan and this marriage will happen.. thats it.. forgive me if i missed like any other argument btw them..

Out there lot of people, have this opinion abt girls dress.. Even though i wont accept it... But it is the fact.. Jansi is small town.. there it is common...

In real, if someone misbehaved with u, u will just slap him with hand or slipper(depends) and walk away from there... or drag him by collar to police(extreme)... But we wont create scene in a road and by shouting and traffic ( its extreme)

If someone tries to stop my marriage before two days... I will try to make it possible by nook and crook ... He didnt follow any non-ethical way to solve it yaar...

If she said he is not suitable for soft urmi and they are polar opposite... Thats the fact

But telling he is not a good man... This marriage wont give anything except regret is some extreme and unnecessary words... But by seeing ishaan, she said he is good for urmi, did she had any interaction with ishaan before( i dont remember anything like that)..

If u ask me, ishaan only said many lies to urmi.. just bcoz he want her to marry his friend.. But I wont blame him.. Like me😉 ishaan also thinks that samrat need to change n urmi can change him

Its my opinion, samrat is indifferent, not upto urmi's expectation... But in reality noone get wat they dreamt of.. Everyone have to comprise.. She will learn it and make him to learn...

If there are gng to make it like some 80s picture.. Like she cried.. cried and cried... Sorry to say it is 2014 now... No one will like it...

Its my opinion abt this track... Sorry if i have hurted anyone feeling

It is not some girl's job to "change" Samrat. If she completely knew what she was in for, that's one thing. But that's not the case with Urmi. And why should the girl have to go through such a situation so she can "change" her husband. She could've found some other match with a guy that's more emotionally available other than having to deal with such a husband for however long before he ultimately "changes."