Why they are making samrat a villain? - Page 2

Originally posted by: zoha11

I think til now its okay but lets see hw they take it further as I think he is tooo handsome for a villain...nd I really dont want every episode to be sad

Originally posted by: likarsh

@TM, I agree that his not wanting to do rasams does not make him a bad guy. Whenever they show the family's, Ishaan's and urmi's faces, I just feel like rolling my eyes. If he doesn't want to do it, he doesn't want to do it. It doesn't make him a big bad dude.

However, he has ideas and views which Urmi didn't know going in. She had enough clues, and she's seen his ego first hand, but still she didn't know what she was getting into because of Ishaan. And Ishaan is not right. Just because Ishaan feels Urmi can change him, doesn't mean he has the right to lead a unknowing girl into the marriage.

That thinking is regressive and outright dangerous. In society, it's the same thought where people get their horrible sons married off to naive wives, with the hope that the son will just settle down with the wife's influence.

Ishaan has no right to take that decision and create a false image and impression of Samrat for Urmi and her family. I know, that other than at the wedding when he was asked outright, that he never did it intentionally but still it is NOT okay. Sad thing is, his idea and view will be validated.

It is not some girl's job to "change" Samrat. If she completely knew what she was in for, that's one thing. But that's not the case with Urmi. And why should the girl have to go through such a situation so she can "change" her husband. She could've found some other match with a guy that's more emotionally available other than having to deal with such a husband for however long before he ultimately "changes."

About Trisha, no that is not all that happened between her and Samrat. Trisha never tried to stop Samrat and Urmi's marriage. Please show me where that happened. She told Urmi about her encounter with Samrat and her opinion of him, Urmi confronted Samrat, and Urmi brushed it off. Trisha never tried to do anything.

It was Samrat himself who called off the marriage, and Trisha only gave an answer unlike her family who were busy demeaning themselves and begging for solutions. Unfortunately for Trisha, he is an egotist and he decided to go through with the wedding.

Still Trisha never tried to call it off. She attempted to tell Urmi of all that happened, but her mother forbid her. It was Urmi herself who called off the wedding due to Samrat's mother's demand. And Samrat because his ego was blinding him, rationalizes this by blaming it on Trisha. That's his own egotistical fault. A decent man would understand and be proud of Urmi, but no he couldn't bring himself to think about what it meant if Urmi called off the wedding without telling her family. So he blames Trisha.

And from blaming Trisha, he proceeds to humiliate her and show her up on stage in the Sangeet. His demeaning act was just that...demeaning. And he did it for what, his ego? His need to humiliate Trisha? Who knows. He had no right to do what he did, and what's more he blamed her for leaving the stage when he knows exactly why she left. His ego drives him, and he sees nothing else.

As for Trisha's reaction to the guys, yeah, she should go up to the three men and slap them, instead of replying to them. Really? Slapping wouldn't make a scene? They didn't touch her, they made comments on her. She has the right to tell them off. She is not the one who created a scene, it's the crowd who felt like gathering. They didn't care to gather when the guys were harassing a girl, but when she started giving it back to them, they gathered.

Samrat's words to Trisha told Trisha that he is not the type of man which will be a good fit for Urmi. Samrat's subsequent actions, behavior and words confirmed it for Trisha. And Trisha is absolutely right, Samrat is wrong for Urmi. The proof is in the fact that Ishaan had to hide, lie and smooth things over. The proof is in the fact that Urmi went in with different expectations. Proof is int he fact that Urmi will be unhappy in the first few months? of her marriage.

Had Urmi and her family known full picture, perhaps they wouldn't have agreed or continued on with the marriage.

And Urmi's family are also at fault for not allowing to Urmi to know of Samrat's calling off the wedding. She had a right to know, she deserved to know.