Originally posted by: SEETHA.K
@ law :Earthly love becomes heavenly one when people just cant live without the other. If one dies, the other hates to live.
Very well said!---maturity personified in these two sentences !!
Dhurandhar 2 - The meltdown has begun
Ranveer Singh the actor - Appreciation Thread!!
New promo Noinas last wish
BETI IS HURT 19.3
ICE REMOVED 20.3
Ranveer, Aditya, cast and crew at Dhurandhar 2 premiere!!
Journalist Vs Madhur Bhandarkar Paresh Rawal
nutmeg7 - Thread for DND
AnashqU - Thread for DND
SarafWasima - Thread for DND
Akshay Khanna Fa9La vs Ranveer Singh Didi Didi
wallflowergirl - Thread for DND
MysticHeart - Thread for DND
Mysterie_girl - Thread for DND
🏏TATA IPL 2026 Build-up Live Updates🏏
Manish Malhotra s mother passes away.
graphicd96 - Thread for DND
Aurora_77 - Thread for DND
Originally posted by: SEETHA.K
@ law :Earthly love becomes heavenly one when people just cant live without the other. If one dies, the other hates to live.
Very well said!---maturity personified in these two sentences !!
Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ
Per BV there many kinds of love... Jagiya our ever in love hero will experience all kinds of love with a myriad of different women😆 Pehle Pyaar... Sacha Pyaar... Scary/Crazy Love... Mature Love... Our Dr. Love😛
Originally posted by: aparnauma
Actually I wanted to see him doing this . Irrespective of whether he ended up marrying her Not . I would have liked to see him drive sense into Sanchi's head in these six months while Ganga is away in Mangalore. Once sense enters Sanchi's head it will be easy to accept the fact that they are not meant to be together. Jagya would go back to mission Ganga and be at peace.
I feel everyone likes and needs companionship. Some are very happy without it too, but generally people are happier and find their life worth living, when they have a companion. Which is largely what we call an institution of marriage. So I find nothing wrong, if someone's life is vacant(not committed) and he/she feels the need for a partner, even if that partner is no longer the same person they once loved dearly.
Anandi, Sugna, Jagya, Ganga all had someone special in their lives whom they loved dearly, but situations were such that they got separated from their partners and could not go back to them. So they all moved on and at one point they gave (will give) this special place to somebody else and will love them dearly too.
Coming to J, I had also wished that he finds happiness in someone and makes her his reason to live. He cannot get Anandi back now and does not want to go back to Gauri, so at one point he would have felt the need to move on with someone.
And it is perfectly ok for him to find that love in Ganga. But CVs' have made mockery of J's character, marriage, love and relationships and that is what some of us object to.
Can't find much logic in CVs story and the message they are trying to give. I sometimes wonder in reality are people always so obliged, so helpless, so indecisive, so sacrificing, and so imbalanced that they either only live for themselves or live just for the family. That they are either complete black or complete white. Why can't Cvs shows something realistic (and legitimate), where people can stand up for they want (desire) and how they go about getting it.