jhooti kasam on Pari

PR made a big drama of Archu's kasam...

Dear Masti,

I don't care much about all this kasam stuff, but your last point is spot on. Now, Purvi is firmly married to Onir, and so she will need a divorce if and when she marries Arjun. However, I have a sneaking suspicion that this situation will not arise.

Shyamala

Originally posted by: m_masti

PR made a big drama of Archu's kasam...

and many argued Purvi really wanted Archu's happiness and breaking Archu's kasam is like Archu's death, so because Purvi has no other choice and she wanted to reunite ArMan for archu's happiness by accepting Ovi's deal...which made Ovi as the bad person for initiating the deal but Purvi is praised and made as tyaagi for accepting the deal and trading Arjun for Archu's happiness...

but now...Purvi asked Onir to take kasam on Pari, and Onir did take kasam on Pari by keeping his hand on Pari's head and said "Shalini is his first wife"...

If Onir taking jhooti kasam on Pari portrayed as mahaan act because it has an awesome reason of reuniting ArVi...then why Purvi breaking Archu's kasam is not portrayed as mahaan act as it involved Archu's happiness and awesome reason of ArMan reuniting...

the whole funda is so fake...how can Onir justify "his act of taking jhooti kasam on Pari"...and how can he make "ArVi wedding as legally valid without onir-purvi official divorce"...

no rey she tld to tke pari kasam and put his hand on pari,but onir just pulled off his hand.

Shyamala aunty,

Well, my dear, Sherma says he did not take the kasam on Pari, for whatever that is worth.

But why do you say that "according to everyone's knowledge Purvi-Onir wedding is not valid"?

Shyamala Aunty.

Originally posted by: m_masti

Shyamala aunty,

even i don't beleive in kasam things they show in PR...but somehow i don't accept it when kasam is taken on infant...

i felt so bad when purvi asked onir to take kasam...and pointed it on that day only...but yesterday i felt bad when truth is out...many praised Onir but in his story telling he should have accepted his mistake of taking jhooti kasam on pari...

according to everyone's knowledge Purvi-Onir wedding is not valid...

but there are many double standards, Archu made Madhuri's wedding as not valid and made Vaishali stick to dharmesh even Dharmesh was bad...but when it comes to Purvi, Archu is not at all looking at the situation, she didnot take ONir's sacrifices into account...

the whole act of Onir's is just to make D and K families to accept Purvi and Pari...

now they are trying to make Ovi as bad for initiating the divorce...where as whole family accepts Purvi and Pari...they are not even thinking of unwed mom and najayiz beti status in the society...but when it comes to soham/savita/varsha they made big society dramas...

because for everyone in show, they still think Shalini is first wife right...so if shalini-onir are married before only then how onir-purvi wedding is valid

Originally posted by: sherma

no rey she tld to tke pari kasam and put his hand on pari,but onir just pulled off his hand.

Originally posted by: m_masti

sherma i didnot watch show...i was reading WUs only...

then why should Purvi beleive Onir is telling truth when he didnot take kasam on Pari...

i think that they will justify onir like dis cause his hands were not there on pari head.

Ok, so you are referring to what the family believes.

Shyamala Aunty

Originally posted by: m_masti

because for everyone in show, they still think Shalini is first wife right...so if shalini-onir are married before only then how onir-purvi wedding is valid

Originally posted by: sherma

i think that they will justify onir like dis cause his hands were not there on pari head.