The gimmick of Zee TV.!!!!

The gimmick of Zee TV to rake inn more money.!!!!

The problem I think is the format of the show. The problem here is more serious. The competition has turned out to be one amongst in equals. Li' ll champ show has a contestant who is visually impaired and who was voted out by judgesafter giving him numerous chances to improve his singing, Judges they found that his range was limited. However, he was brought back as a wild card entry and now has is amongst the final three contenders of the Li'll Champs tittle. That was serious injustice done to the other contestant.

So how did someone who is not a very good singer end up in the top three???

The contender is still in the competition because of sympathy. His sympathy and add to it his well-manner approach has won him votes from Junta like us outnumbering really talented singers who had to unfortunately leave the show. What we fail to realise is this is not a sympathy or personality contest unlike Indian Idol where your persona is taken into account. SARAGAMAPA has always been a basically singing talent hunt.

I think it's the organizers of Zee not the public who is to blame. It's very natural for anyone with a heart to feel sympathy with a visually handicapped person trying to compete with physically fit contestant.
It's unfair on the part of show organizers to the rest of the participants to bring back a physically challenged person back as a wild card entry, especially when the junta's votes are now the decisive factor. They should've known that people will vote out of sympathy.

In fact they could've seen the opportunity here and maybe planned for a special talent show for physically challenged.

Don't agree with you Bob da. If Sameer could be on the top three, then Diwakar also deserves to be on the top three. He has a much better voice than Sameer.

Absolutely qwest!!! Our stevie wonders is visualy challenged but he is an excellent singer so could have been diwarker. Indian voters too good in symphaty voting.

Originally posted by: apparaohoare

Don't agree with you Bob da. If Sameer could be on the top three, then Diwakar also deserves to be on the top three. He has a much better voice than Sameer.

Appa, point is not Sameer infact the other contestant, just take in consideration they could have use wild card for Pawni or Abro.

well i dont know but look at this way
out of the top 5 that the judges at least 4 no body had any doubt
shraddha pawni abhro and sanchita that they deserved to be in the top 5

i was not sure abt sameer neha should have been in

but when public voting came through with the exception all the talented singers went out one by one

Dont know Bobda, if this is you saying the above or you are quoting an article

But the same logic that is applied here for Diwakar applies to Sameer too, Sameer was brought in at the last moment, he was given the same # of chances that Diwakar was given

If Diwakar stayed in with the sympathy factor, Sameer stayed in with the cute-naughty factor

If your issue is bringing back Diwakar, It was not Diwakar, they had an open audition, they had everyone audition for that round, Diwakar beat out others by the rules of the game, you dont like the rule of the game, Live with that, If you complain about those rules, also make sure to complain about the 112 votes rule change, Dont be a blind fan in just complaining about only one rule change,

In fact the second rule change was more blatant, the advantage of 112 was only to Sameer, where was your outrage then?

The rule change for public voting had a 20% probabilty for Diwakar

We have gone over this again and again, the contest has ended, Let us give the kids a break, Let us end this on a good note, Let us not make this a repeat of C2005 where people were trying to take each other's fav down, just b'cos their fav lost out

Everybody, Let us just move on, PLEASE

i think both zee and public are equally responsible..and yes appaji you r right sameer didnt deserve to be in final three..
so the conclusion is the competition is reduced to ..cuteness,X-factor, and performance..

Qwestji, you r right. Once an avid fan of SRGMP (Sonu nigam days) now I have almost stopped watching this show. Gajengra singh should have left the show untouched. This show used to be a sheer delight for true music lovers. He should have introduced some other show if he wanted to mint money. But he chose an unethical route. Clubbing Diwakar with other singers made them look hapless.

I will not agree with you here Bob'da...

If Diwakar was brought back after he was eliminated, so was Sameer after he was clearly out before the finals.. Voice quality wise, IMO Diwakar is much better than Sameer... So, we cannot single out Diwakar that his being in the final 3 was unjust to Abhro or Pawni... IMO - he is more talented and deserving than Sameer...

Definitely - Abhro and Pawni should have been in the finals along with Sanchita and that would have been the clash of the titans for the Finale..

Originally posted by: ritzbitz

i think both zee and public are equally responsible..and yes appaji you r right sameer didnt deserve to be in final three..
so the conclusion is the competition is reduced to ..cuteness,X-factor, and performance..

Sameer has his own charm but I do not think he has an X factor. Else he would have been the winner.