META Pyromaniac Padmini v Roaring Radha!! - Page 11

Originally posted by: shridevigaddam

Oh! I have read all your posts in this discussions. I have liked majority of them as I understood them, even if I did not agree with some thoughts. Some I did not post my like because I would rather chew on the matter for digesting. But then others followed up on your posts and it made the debate interesting.😊 I am getting to know you.

I am new in this forum, so am happy knowing members here. Glad to meet you all.

For me more than the agreement or disagreement, mutual respect matters. Nothing more than that. And no one thing in this world is absolute. Everything is relative. So thoughts vary. Perfectly agreeable as we tend to make all kinds of equations anyways.

Must say MEIEJ has gripped me bad like fever.

I need to do weekend housekeeping and here I am sitting at the forum. 😆

Thanks..😊 Glad to meet you too. 😃But I must tell you, you are occasionally too deep and too philosophical for me to follow.. That makes the whole equation very interesting..

As for my comments on the thread:

I try not to judge too harshly and not be too cynical in my outlook. It doesnt always work. But it does help lighten my mind to a certain extend.

Some ideas may represent my personal view. Others on how I perceive the character and their actions.

Originally posted by: Foucaults-qalam

Meta peeps,

As the weekend draws to a close, at least where I am, i wish to thank you all for a totally sick chai party. Who would like to convene next weekend's party? Topic will be there choice, as will the first comment. If it is helpful, we could copy and paste the definition of meta on the new thread, to encourage new participation. what do you think? Also, perhaps a firmer stance discouraging completely unrelated spamming as we got yesterday?

To me, this was a huge success. The range ideas and quality of discussion were very high, and I enjoyed every moment of it!

salute!

Originally posted by: bhoomi.s

It would have been illegal for her to marry Malik, not immoral. There's a difference, isn't there? But I do agree with you that her life wasn't wasted. If she didn't feel the need to marry Malik, then so be it. No reason why she should've done that if she didn't want to. I do think she was a bit unwise in allowing Malik to give his name to the girls though; she just set them up for uncomfortable situations in the future. When your children bear the name of a man and you live with him, obviously people are going to assume you are married to/in a relationship with the man. Someone as worried about societal acceptance as Padmini is should've thought things through... I don't know if I'm making any sense here

Originally posted by: Foucaults-qalam

@ anjana i think the points being stressed were why, when she has partaken of all the benefits of marriage vis a vis Mallik, ( I will not mention the sexual component here) , she continued to stick to the hypocrisy of maintaning a charade of marital purity.

I would have admired he characterisation much more has she been shown to take on the identity of a separated woman.

has anyone thought of Malik here? Why did he not marry, have a family? Surely, the big sacrifice is his, as he gave up his own dreams to live life along the lines Padmini chose for herself and her daughters.

Originally posted by: bhoomi.s

Once bitten, twice shy. I've had some weird experiences before. Have decided I'd better put disclaimers while making controversial (however slightly) points. I didn't mean to comment on the levels of acceptance on this thread 😃 😃