META Pyromaniac Padmini v Roaring Radha!! - Page 7

Originally posted by: xodramalover

Yes, I understand what you are saying and I agree with you. Padmini believes relationships are sacred and don't break so easily

Originally posted by: Coeur2PsychoFMS

Aur haan it's Coeur not couer 😆

Originally posted by: shiv_parvati

Pls pardon me for my writing skills. I am only good at crunching numbers ( that's my profession ).

I like Radhaji a lot . I am not sure why. But one thing I am glad , she is nice to Madhu. But her equation with RK, I feel its till too early to judge her yet.. We don't know the reason why she married Kukuji and why her husband committed suicide.

Now coming to Padminiji , I have a question. I clearly remembered in one the episodes, she was explaining to Trishna and Madhu that marriage is not a game you play with it.

Ok now lets say down the road , malik for some reason manage to get the 40 lakhs and repay RK. Would Padmini want Madhu to end the marriage and leave RK. ( which I assume it will not happen)

She ran away from her devil husband but still wears the mangalsutra.. She clearly believes in sancity of marriage.

I wonder what would she have to say at Madhu at that point.

I hope it makes sense😆

Originally posted by: shridevigaddam

From my point of view that dialogue from Padmini on that D-Day was not worth registering and analysing. Because as we know those days, the show's agenda was to drive every point towards the climax - the breakpoint of Malik-Chaudhry family. The HURT, the LOSS was to be shown at maximum, so creating angst of broken engagement, as otherwise there was not much love or passion in MB-Mukund relationshop and already viewers were waiting for the engagement to break. One had to show some pain. So using Padmini's character there, and also they wanted Trishna to turn negative, so have her negated at every step, That day what Trishna said actually was making sense, but writers had to make something out of it, so make the mother go against her.

So truly speaking, for me it is filler situation in the plot and filler dialogue in the screenplay.

Originally posted by: TrueKash

Heart of a psycho na 😉 and we r discussing about guys and RK is a guy aswell 😛 And since this thread is about his mother then we r using reverse psychology... going from RK to his mom 😉 btw this is madhubala forum and expect alot of reverse psychology here 😉

Originally posted by: Foucaults-qalam

You absolutely are! I would say , however, as to what is it that Padmini considers sacred about marriage? Surely she doesn't believe in tha multi-birth package deal because, if so, then god help her! Has she actually thought about what aspect of this oh so scared relationship she wants to keep safe?

So far, i do not see even one argument that she makes to justify her remaining a suhagan beyond the one advanced by shridevi and myself. She is only after the social moral security offered to a married woman in regressive and paternalistic society. People like to call it 'traditional' as a sort of euphemistic sop, but I like calling a spade a spade.

😊. English is not my first language and I find it difficult to express what I really what to say...

Pads comes from a very different background than me atleast. From a background where having a girl child is seen as a sin. She isnt been protrayed as an educated woman. She silently bears the illtreatment of her husband. It doesnt cross her mind that she should protest against it. Probably people around her, from her childhood onwards, she has been taught that once you are married you belong to your husband and his family.. etc... etc... I dont think the people around that place have even heard the word divorce! Once you are married, you are. It doesnt matter if you get anything from the marraige, but once you enter you are in.. I have seen couples (not many, but few atleast; they are even educated!) who put up with this kind of marriages for the sake of their children. Unlike Pads case they put up with things bcos of 'society' (Though I dont know why you have to please society when you yourself are not happy)... I think in Pads she doesnt know the concept of divorce. She believes in the same things that millions of Indian women around the global who do Kadvachawt (is that how it is spelled?) believes.. She might in all probability be still keeping kadvachawt for her husband- because that was what she was taught! It was only because her child's existence was in question that she thought of fleeing from her husband. Had that not been the case, she would still be suffering whatever hardship the mother and son subjects her to..

😊. English is not my first language and I find it difficult to express what I really what to say...

Pads comes from a very different background than me atleast. From a background where having a girl child is seen as a sin. She isnt been protrayed as an educated woman. She silently bears the illtreatment of her husband. It doesnt cross her mind that she should protest against it. Probably people around her, from her childhood onwards, she has been taught that once you are married you belong to your husband and his family.. etc... etc... I dont think the people around that place have even heard the word divorce! Once you are married, you are. It doesnt matter if you get anything from the marraige, but once you enter you are in.. I have seen couples (not many, but few atleast; they are even educated!) who put up with this kind of marriages for the sake of their children. Unlike Pads case they put up with things bcos of 'society' (Though I dont know why you have to please society when you yourself are not happy)... I think in Pads she doesnt know the concept of divorce. She believes in the same things that millions of Indian women around the global who do Kadvachawt (is that how it is spelled?) believes.. She might in all probability be still keeping kadvachawt for her husband- because that was what she was taught! It was only because her child's existence was in question that she thought of fleeing from her husband. Had that not been the case, she would still be suffering whatever hardship the mother and son subjects her to.."