Amrita Singh's royal snub

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

Salma2

@Salma2

Voyager

Posted: 14 years ago

#51

lol...why did people assume they know everything in others lives?

Amirita has every right to go to the funeral or keep distance from it..

why fans jump in?

Showing up/not at a funeral is not some thing needed to discuss 7 pages..

Quote

Yuvika

@Yuvika_15

Moderator

+ 10

Posted: 14 years ago

#52

i believe it was a gd thing 2 avoid it... esp considering they didnt part ways on a good note unlike other couples. also agree with the member who mentioned hw its nt important 2 attend a funeral 2 pay ur respect...one can do so in private n m sure she wud hav dne tht...

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

respect123

@respect123

Voyager

Posted: 14 years ago

#53

I have a bit of an unrelated question guys - please indulge me. It came from reading that Amrita had asked Saif to give her 5 crores for the kids and 2.5 crores for herself.

Now I don't live in India so pardon the ignorance but isn't 7.5 crores a really paltry sum to ask from Saif? Here in USA when a couple splits their assets are divided almost equally. I cannot believe that all the wealth Saif had (at that point) was equal to 15 crores?

On a different note: When would someone be considered to have reached the "really rich and really comfortable" bracket? I mean - the minimum number (in lakhs or crores) which I person MUST have to be considered extremely wealthy?

I mean - if a person has 20 lakhs in assets I bet they cannot be called extremely wealthy. However a person with 50 crores - yes definitely. What is the minimum figure to be called "extremely wealthy"

Please enlighten me- I am having a debate with my friends here ;)

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 14 years ago

#54

I wish I could help but I have no clue there, lol

Quote

401366

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#55

Originally posted by: respect123

I mean - if a person has 20 lakhs in assets I bet they cannot be called extremely wealthy. However a person with 50 crores - yes definitely. What is the minimum figure to be called "extremely wealthy"

Please enlighten me- I am having a debate with my friends here ;)

well, it depends on the society the person lives.

if the neighborhood is outside the metros, having 20/30 crs makes one filthy rich.

but, if the person lives in any metro 50crs are like peanuts.

a lavish apartment in Mumbai costs 15/16 crores or more.

for a Mumbaiker exceeding 200 crores of assets makes a person filthy rich.

Quote

respect123

@respect123

Voyager

Posted: 14 years ago

#56

Thank you. That kind of ties in with what I thought. So Amrita asking for 7.5 crores total for life from Saif is really crazy isn't it? What is it going to get her really?

My friends (some cousins from India) also mentioned that if a person crosses 6 crore (I don't know why 6 lol) they go into the bracket of "really rich" and if they cross 20 then they go into the bracket of filthy rich (minimum sums to enter the bracket). They were speaking for all over India in general though not specifically Mumbai.

Any other opinions? This is really interesting for me...

Originally posted by: bamboocopter

well, it depends on the society the person lives.
if the neighborhood is outside the metros, having 20/30 crs makes one filthy rich.
but, if the person lives in any metro 50crs are like peanuts.
a lavish apartment in Mumbai costs 15/16 crores or more.
for a Mumbaiker exceeding 200 crores of assets makes a person filthy rich.

Quote

Lord_Voldemort

@Lord_Voldemort

Rocker

+ 9

Posted: 14 years ago

#57

She did the right thing here.

Quote

401366

Suspended

Posted: 14 years ago

#58

Originally posted by: respect123
Thank you. That kind of ties in with what I thought. So Amrita asking for 7.5 crores total for life from Saif is really crazy isn't it? What is it going to get her really?

at that period, i guess, Saif was not even a 1crore/movie actor.

SRK used to charge 4 to 5 crores per film.