Posted:
Finally, you suggested closing the threads, that was what was precisely done - the mods closed 2 threads out of 15 threads of Jake before they started to attack the moderators for discrimination. NOW how fair is that??? When the same mods have closed 100s of threads that violated TERMS of USE and Code of Conduct of IF. The thing is should Jake's threads be kept open just because it is Jake if they violate COC and TOS? While they should close all threads irrespective of whether it is friend of foe, when TOS and COC are violated?
CLOSING the THREADS:
Was that not the reason for all this hoopla and cries of discrimination and FB pages of "We hate GEET IF mods, replace them" and noises elsewhere.
When a thread violated the WEB SITE's TERMS of USE, that has been closed on being reported by several parties, and hence came all the backlash against the IF Mods, and you are saying that why don't they do it. That is precisely what they did before this debate started with charges of discrimination thrown against the IF Geet forums mods that they are doin' so-and-so against so-and-so when the EVIDENCE proves to the contrary. So tell me where is justice?
CLOSING the THREADS:
Was that not the reason for all this hoopla and cries of discrimination and FB pages of "We hate GEET IF mods, replace them" and noises elsewhere.
When a thread violated the WEB SITE's TERMS of USE, that has been closed on being reported by several parties, and hence came all the backlash against the IF Mods, and you are saying that why don't they do it. That is precisely what they did before this debate started with charges of discrimination thrown against the IF Geet forums mods that they are doin' so-and-so against so-and-so when the EVIDENCE proves to the contrary. So tell me where is justice?
All things Korean
Current Affairs
