The idea of the Goddess - Paulo Coehlo

power1921 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#1

The idea of the Goddess

Author Paulo Coehlo explores the feminine face of God.


Born to write Paulo Coelho.

If you are an admirer of Paulo Coehlo (and how many are not!) you must tune in to his many talks that are available on the net. The one that is short and endearing but evocative just as much with ideas and could instigate a revolution of sorts is an interview on National Public Radio.

With an English which is mildly accented that brings to mind just a touch of the free Latin-American spirit, Paulo Coehlo says, "I think…the recurring theme in our lives since the dawn of human kind…is to answer this classical question, who am I? So I think most of our works of art, or whatever we do, including science or religion, tried to answer that question. That said, me as a writer, I also try to understand myself better, and the only way that I have to understand myself better is by sharing myself with myself, meaning, that I have to write and when I write, I understand what is inside of me at an unconscious level. Then, I think it is also part of the human condition to somehow divide your feelings with other people so you feel that you're not alone."

In this quest to find oneself, Coehlo does not restrict himself to the religion he was born into. "That's true that - well, first of all, I am Catholic but I am not a Catholic writer. I'm a Catholic because I, myself, I need some discipline, I need the religion, I need this collective worship that our religion allows, but at the same time, I'm open to spirituality in general, and at the end of the day, I'm responsible for my acts…"

Agreeing to the fact that religion, his own included, is slow to change, he affirms that change is inevitable. For example, he says as he looks into the future, "In the next 200 years, you will not be here, I will not be here. But somehow A, they're going to allow women to celebrate the Mass, which is forbidden today; B, they are going to allow priestess to marry, which is also forbidden, and finally, they will understand that Virgin Mary is the manifestation — the way that we worship the Virgin Mary — is the manifestation of the feminine face of God. So if I see this presence of the feminine face of God around instead of trying to follow what the Catholic Church says, I should be more open."

Taking the listener back to the meaning of God, he says, for centuries we as a society have been so obsessed with the male figure that we have looked and referred and thought of God as a male figure. But says Coehlo, "God is love, and love is, in my opinion, in my understanding, it is simplified because, of course, God has no sex, but love belongs to this feminine face of the Lord, of the divine energy. So in The Witch of Portobello, the main character, tries somehow to bring this love, this universal love to her life."

Author of more than 20 books translated into 64 languages across the world, Coehlo says his readers do not tell him that he has changed their life but instead feel they too could have written what he has…this, he says shows people understand him.

In other words a good writer is one who can make the reader feel it is something even he or she could have done. Another nugget of wisdom comes when the interviewer asks him why he writes and he says simply, "Because my dream was to be a writer, I thank God for it, for being so successful. My dream was to be a writer, then a writer writes books, so I have to write books."

Created

Last reply

Replies

4

Views

879

Users

2

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

344471 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#2
His preachy, pretentious works do not work for me, sorry. He had an interesting potential, but he wastes them on writing the same thing over and over again. The only two books I liked was Alchemist and By the River...
power1921 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: PhoeniXof_Hades

His preachy, pretentious works do not work for me, sorry. He had an interesting potential, but he wastes them on writing the same thing over and over again. The only two books I liked was Alchemist and By the River...


completely agree....i should add one more book to ur list:Like the flowing river...
i think he got it wrong with his "11 minutes"
344471 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#4
^ Have not read Like The Flowing River, but my interest level in PC had gone so low that I don't think I will be reading that book anytime soon. Like I said, I don't think PC is a bad writer. I think he has the potential in himself but he wastes them away by repeating the same thing in every book. Each book should be different from the other, or else people will get bored of it.

I happen get the vibe that he tries to come off as someone really intellectual but he falls short of it at every step. I do not like the way he tries to shove his message down our throats either; instead of being neutral and letting us readers decide for ourselves, he tries way too hard to make us see his side and agree with him, or at least that is the impression I got from him. His messages are a bit too strong for my taste.
Edited by PhoeniXof_Hades - 15 years ago
power1921 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: PhoeniXof_Hades

^ Have not read Like The Flowing River, but my interest level in PC had gone so low that I don't think I will be reading that book anytime soon. Like I said, I don't think PC is a bad writer. I think he has the potential in himself but he wastes them away by repeating the same thing in every book. Each book should be different from the other, or else people will get bored of it.

I happen get the vibe that he tries to come off as someone really intellectual but he falls short of it at every step. I do not like the way he tries to shove his message down our throats either; instead of being neutral and letting us readers decide for ourselves, he tries way too hard to make us see his side and agree with him, or at least that is the impression I got from him. His messages are a bit too strong for my taste.


well,the same happened to me after reading 11 mins...i still can't understand why he had to write that book....the topic was something like"can sex be spiritual"?...the way he treated the subject was pathetic...it sounded more like an erotic novel than a well researched philosophy...
like you said,the message came in parts and that too not complete..it seemed,like he was using his popularity(riding high on the success of his previous works)to sell off the book...

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".