Originally posted by: _LalithaJanaki_
Our culture requires us (both men and women) to wear decent clothing that does not reveal what should not be seen. An Indian is one who follows our culture, whether one believes that or not. Is it not merely to live in India, but to act like a proper Indain person.
It is not at all wrong to wear western clothes, but there are decent respectable western clothes as well. No one told her to wear revealing clothes. It's disgusting.š¤¢
But, whose culture is this?
Looking back at history, there were several groups of people who did not dress in what we today think are traditional or decent dress. What about in parts of South India where women who were not the most upper castes went topless? This was not considered indecent at the time. It was part of the culture. And, it's only when the missionaries came to these areas that they deemed this indecent.
And, what is the limit of decency? What if I said for me (a Muslim), for a woman not to wear sleeves or cover her shoulders is indecent, to have a neckline of a dress not to be at your neck and to reveal chest is indecent, etc.. Yet, it's very accepted today by many girls that they wear sleeveless outfits with the back or the front cut lower than at the neck. So, is my sense of decency Indian, or is yours?
What we need to remember is that everyone has a different sense of what is acceptable. I cannot condemn someone for dressing differently than what I would call decency. They have to decide what is right for them. And, for Rakhi to feel comfortable in a western dress with the back gone or whatever does not take away from the fact that she is indeed an Indian girl.
It's nice to debate this - I feel great that everyone is standing up for their Indian-ness. But, in the process of doing so, I do not feel we have a right to judge Rakhi. We do not know her intentions and can only make assumptions.