rumer about lord ram

kira ford-001 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#1
hey friends, i've heared the news in jaya tv that,lord ram is not good sensed man.he is a smuggler, like that.not only that,our lord has built the thanush koti(rameshwaram).but now he itself going to damage that.don't you get shocked???😲 i've stunned hearing this news.i am angry too.😡 how dare they can say like that?😡.after hearing that,i thought that share to with you. if you also heared that news pls give some more info. but they will go def to hel.😡😭
but why they are saying like that?😕
Edited by kira ford-001 - 17 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

35

Views

2.7k

Users

12

Frequent Posters

coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#2
What ur question pls clarify. I didn't get it

title ur topic sufficiently. The title that u gave is ambigous. pls use clear n unambigous language
kira ford-001 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: coolpurvi

What ur question pls clarify. I didn't get it

title ur topic sufficiently. The title that u gave is ambigous. pls use clear n unambigous language

ok,i'll do it
kira ford-001 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#4
is that ok or??
coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#5
what is ur question? what's the rumour
kira ford-001 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: coolpurvi

what is ur question? what's the rumour

purvi,can't you get me?
they said that our lord ram is not as we thought.what is your opinion??do you say yes or no??
but this is not good to say a god like this.
coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: kira ford-001

purvi,can't you get me?
they said that our lord ram is not as we thought.what is your opinion??do you say yes or no??
but this is not good to say a god like this.


pls tell in detail what was shown. What they r showing. why they r callin him smuggler.
sitakshii thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 17 years ago
#8
please !!!! REFRAIN from making such comments at RAMAYAN forum ,ur post itself is so confusing !!! types !!! who watches tht stupid jaya tv !!!! 😡 i am really angry😡 😡tht some crap channels spreading rumour abt OUR LORD RAM !! PLEASE !!! DO NOT BELEIVE IN ANY SUCH stupid rumours !! this is higly in-decent !!! a total crap rumour from a crap channel jaya tv !!!!!😡
Shruti11 thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 17 years ago
#9
sita di i think this member is talking about the news these days centeral govt say that ram setu was destroy by ramji according to kamban ramayana(tamil ramayan)
but this is not true nowhere it is mention in valmiki ramayana that ramji destroy ramsetu
di i have visited that ramsetu i thik it wonderful place vry beautiful and pure ⭐️
coolpurvi thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#10
Long back I've posted it under the topic "Construction of Ramsetu". I m posting it again hope it'll clear confusion

Today when the description of Rama and creation of the Rama Sethu as a myth is creating a furore, it is interesting to note that for thousands of years, there was a royal family in South India with its headquarters at Ramanathapuram near Rameshwaram, known as the Sethupati Rajas or the guardians of the Sethu. Like the Maharajas of Kashi in North India, the specific task of these kings was to guard the sanctity of Rameshwaram temple and protect the Sethu ' now so much under the limelight.
In fact even today, though the famous Rameshwaram temple (which technically belonged to the Sethupatis) is administered by the Government of Tamil Nadu, the head of the Sethupati dynasty, at present Rajeshwari Nachiar, is the hereditary head of the temple' s board of trustees.
Detailed information about the Sethupathis is available in the ' Ramnad Manual' maintained by Tamil Nadu archives. It states that, ' The Sethupatis built several chattrams (dharmsalas) along the main roads of the pilgrimage to Rameshwaram. Roads were opened through the forests. Immense sums were spent on the restoration of the Rameshwaram temples, which were falling into ruins, and the splendid Chockattan Mantapam or the cloistered precincts of the temple at Rameshwaram being finally completed by the Sethupati representatives..' Although the dynasty claims that they are mentioned in the 2000-year-old sagas of Tamil literature, as the brave Marava community guarding the Sethu since the times of Rama, the first historical reference comes only in the 11th century AD, when Chola king Rajaraja made the head of Marava community as Sethupati to protect the pilgrims to Rameshwaram temple and the Rama Sethu.
The temple complex itself was built by Sethupati rulers in the 12th century, with Sethupathy Maravar beginning the construction of the grand Ramanathaswamy temple. Then again reference is made in A D1434 to the repair of the temple walls by the head of the Sethupati clan, known as Udayan Sethupati. Geologists state that till AD1480, when a tsunami damaged the present Rama Sethu, one could walk from India to Sri Lanka on the Sethu!
But only from AD 1605, we find detailed history of these chiefs, who are described as masters of Sethu and their kingdom described as Sethu Nadu (Land of Sethu). After the destruction of the Vijayanagar empire in 1565, their viceroy in South India, the the Nayak ruler of Madurai, re-appointed head of the same Marava community as the Sethupatis.
The most important of these monarchs was the Raghunatha Sethupati II alias Kilavan Sethupati (1671 AD to 1710 AD), who ensured that Sethupatis with their fiefdom over the area known as Ramnad, remained all powerful. It was during his time, that the magnificent still existing palace of Ramlingavilasam was created as the residence of the Sethupatis. No other palace in Tamil Nadu has such extensive mural paintings. As soon as you enter the Mahamandapam, you are surrounded by murals that glint like gem-encrusted jewels on the walls. Some are dull and faded, while others flash forth their brilliance, even 300 years after they were executed. In 1978, the Sethupati family, unable to maintain the palace handed it over to the Government of Tamil Nadu.
But in the18th century, the British entered the politics of South India and as a measure to reduce the importance of the Sethupatis, they were demoted as mere zamindars under the British in1803. Of all the services, this royal family has done to India, the most important was that of financing the visit of Swami Vivekananda in 1893 to Chicago, to address the World Religions Conference. Swami Vivekananda reached Ramnathapuram in 1892 and met the then scion, Bhaskara Sethupati at his palace, and stayed there as the official guest for eight days.
Initially, it was Bhaskara Setupati as the Raja of Ramnad, who had earlier decided to go to US to attend the Parliament of Religions as the representative of Hinduism. But after conversing with Swami Vivekananda, he decided that Swamiji was the right person to attend the conference.
Vivekananda decided to accept the Raja' s offer. When Vivekananda returned from USA after his grand success, as he was about to land at Rameshwaram, the overjoyed Raja was waiting with his entourage to give him a royal welcome. Because of the achievement of Swamiji and as well as the regard, the Raja had for him, he bowed his head and offered it as step for Vivekananda to get down from the boat. But, Swamiji tactfully avoided this offer, by jumping from the boat to the land. Then the Raja unyoked the bullocks from Vivekananda' s ceremonial chariot and pulled the conveyance manually with his entourage, till it reached his palace. Later he erected a victory pillar of 25 feet height with the Upanishad expression Satyameva Jayate to commemorate the success of Swami Vivekananda at Chicago.
After Indian Independence, the Sethupatis still retained their importance in the politics of Tamil Nadu. In fact Shanmuga Raja Sethupati won the elections to the Tamil Nadu Assembly and held the seat thrice from 1951 to 1967, besides being a minister in the Rajagopalachari Ministry of 1952. He was well-known in horse racing circles and had a stable of over 50 horses in Calcutta and a huge garage of cars in Madras, including Rolls Royces and a Bentley. But the abolition of zamindaries by the Government of India, removed all sources of their wealth and today, the former Sethupatis are just well-known prominent magnates of Tamil Nadu.
The existence of the bridge obviously cannot be denied! However to what extent there was manual intervention in connecting the gaps between the shoals, islands and rocks is a subject for detailed marine archaeological and geological research. This kind of research has never been carried out nor has any team been constituted so far. However, there is enough evidence about the existence as well as the use of this bridge in ancient Indian history, literature and travelogues etc.
Maharishi Valmiki has recorded in his Ramayan- (Yuudh Kand, sarg 22 and shlokas 45-73) that Shri Rama' s army constructed a bridge over the sea between Rameswaram and Sri Lanka. After crossing this bridge, Shri Rama' s army reached Sri Lanka, defeated Ravana and liberated Sita from his captivity. Valmiki has narrated in detail that originally Shri Rama' s army camped in Kodikarai but found that place unsuitable for constructing the bridge. Therefore, the entire army was shifted to Rameswaram. Research was carried out by Shri Ram for three days to find out a suitable location in the sea for constructing the land route so that the army could cross over to Sri Lanka. Finally, the suitable location was identified. Shri Nal was a famous shilpakar, who had the expertise similar to that of Vishwakarma in constructing the bridges, was requested to construct the bridge. ( 6/22/45).
After carrying out the survey, Nal declared that a bridge can indeed be constructed. The armymen of Shri Ram utilized various tools and implements for uprooting trees like Taar, coconut, mango, ashoka, bakul etc., and with the help of various yantras transported these trees, stones, and rocks to the seashore. Shilpakar Nal directed the armymen to stand with long ropes/chains on either side and filled the space in between with creepers, trees, stones and rocks and bound them together. The construction of Ramsetu was completed in five days by connecting the existing land route consisting of islands, rocks and shoals.
This bridge was being used as land route between India and Sri Lanka for thousands of years, though sometimes part of it was submerged under the seawater. King Asoka' s son Mahendra and daughter Sanghamitra had used this bridge to go to Sri Lanka more than 2,300 years back. Muslims believe that Adam had gone to Adam hill in Sri Lanka for penance by making use of this bridge. A gazette notiication issued by British Govt on Madras Presidency in 1803 has stated that Ramasetu was being used as land link between Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka until 15th century AD when it got damaged and submerged due to cyclone and storm. Dutch and French maps drawn in 16th and 17th centuries show this Ramasetu as operational land route between Rameswaram (India) and Talai Mannar (Sri Lanka) ' available in Saraswati Mahal Library, Tanjore.
As per the Government of India ' there are no archeological or historical studies which confirm the existence of Ramsetu bridge between India and Sri Lanka in ancient times.' Apparently this statement only reflects ignorance of Himalayan proportions about many fundamental historical, archaeological, geological as well as geographical facts. If only somebody had even opened the websites - Google Earth which contains interesting as well as authentic pictures of submerged Ramsetu and https://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/ which displays most authentic historical atlas of South Asia and has placed pictures of Ramsetu for the period starting from vedic era and 5th century BC to 19th century AD along with nomenclature of Ramsetu prevailing at the relevant times, the conclusions arrived at would have been quite different !.

(source of info-Lankanews.com)

Edited by coolpurvi - 17 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".