in genral if the chracter is outlined as a coconut or typically blonde and dumb (aka poo) then no doubt the chracter has been strerotyped, moreover they happen to show british asians with immense atttiude i sure as hell don't have that, true i can be bit to talkative at home and my tongue can be bit shrp but i relaise when and where to speak!
katrina and upens role was very real but having said that its important that popel hwo do watch the film don't assume that all british asians are like it was merely a protrayal of some of the individuals resided there...
simialr to the characters of goal...how many found it ludicrus that being pkaistani some of them drank unfortunatley this does occur and as much as it pains and annoys me to admit it, it is actually common, howver once again it is only a percentage not the entire population.
the chracters in ddlj were quite truthful, in reagrds to the time it was amde, perhaps even now... yeah becasue simran wasn't a complete gullible desi type she too knew what to say and when take her arguements with raj as an exmaple but yeah she was very rooted and had common sesnse something writers seem to think we don't have!
charming!
so i do agree writers really need to do there research before they create 'typical characters' since they arent typical but stereotypical!
look at the plot line and then the chracter don't just assume acha we we want british asians hence they must be dumb, no nothing of their desi heritage and secondly dress riduculousy (hoesntly tell me how many of you would actually dress like poo in k3g to univeristy!)
7