Originally posted by: Moor278
2 questions..
At what point would you say DK is negative??? Like which action of his will tell you that???
Soon. Even after Mannat assuring him like in BTS, if he still goes ahead and plots against her then he is turning negative. DK, with current characterization, has it in him to THINK and slowly move away. Writers are not exploring that. Thats the pity. I still think Mannat WILL not want to get married. But going by the rumours, DK WILL plan the wedding with ulterior motives. So he turned negative, after her assurance. That is sad. I am saying it is not needed but if they want that way, I dont have a problem. Thats how they are writing.
If Vik as lead can behave the most obnoxious way and show worst kind of behaviour... what makes you think a side character cant be butchered to further the story???
I dont think like that. I am going by characterization. DK-Dua bond is one thing that was consitent. DK till now, was shown to be a good man. Going by that, I hoped for a better treatment. But I am aware that they will ruin him. If they can ruin ML, then who is DK?!
But they just lost an awesome chance to redeem Vik, slowly and steadily. Just like he said in BTS. He can be like his brother, while his brother remains the same good man. You and I wanted Vik's redemption without compromising DK right. They could have done that. they have the material. But still choosing not to do it. 
1.4k