Originally posted by: Bagarh.Billa
Dhurandhar 2 = 3.6 Crore Footfalls(people) = Collection = 896 Cr (Till Monday, 3rd Week)
Bahubali 2 = 5.4 Crore Footfalls = Collection = 510 Cr
Now you can see how much inflated TICKET Rates are, but audience isn't matching the mighty Bahubali 2. It might touch 4 cr footfalls at best in it's run, but won't be able to match Bahubali 2, Gadar, HAHK kind of Mega Blockbusters.
Dhurandhar 2 is aiming 1000 cr Nett which is almost double of Bahubali 2, but won't be able to touch 5 Cr footfalls which proves that HIGH Numbers came from Inflation & if it would have Universal Appreciation, then Footfalls would also have doubled.
Uchhal Uchhal ke bas Numbers, figures utha ke mat dikhao, talk to me when any Ranveer, Ranbir or Vicky's film actually touch 5 cr footfalls.
Comparing footfalls across different eras like it’s a fair 1:1 is already flawed. Ticket pricing, screen count, population reach, and viewing habits have all changed massively since Baahubali
Also, higher ticket prices don’t magically guarantee higher collections footfalls still matter, and 4 cr people showing up today, in the OTT era, is huge in itself
And if ‘universal appreciation = footfalls doubling’, then by that logic even many big blockbusters post-2010 aren’t “universally loved” either
At the end of the day, you’re still proving the film has massive reach just trying hard to downplay it because it didn’t match a once-in-a-generation benchmark. Not every blockbuster needs to replicate Baahubali or Gadar to be huge
Numbers don’t matter to numbers are inflated to footfalls don’t match… the goalpost keeps moving. Nah, this is fcking hilarious and the cope is fcking insane atp🤣 Just say you don’t like the film and move on lmao
Edited by Sociopath - 2 months ago
4