Originally posted by: SathyaT
I remember on that killing Purvi's family episode, they were mentioning they were surprised Aryaman has supported them and then in last episode they are mentioning they had knocked him out.. if this is the plan then why that dialogue on that episode just to make us believe Aryaman really stabbed Purvi..
There is no clarity when Bharni entered and stabbed Purvi in the form of Aryaman. They should show clearly when she entered they had already stabbed entire Purvi's family some sort of to justify Bharni couldn't help them so she just stabbed Purvi to let her hate Aryaman.. and also they could have shown somehow Bharni helped Purvi to come alive so that her stance will be more believable.
Guess writing could be improved to give the viewers clarity and connect with the storyline rather than randomly inserting scenes
Bharni couldn't have helped to save Purvi's family either way . Either she entered too late , by that time they're already dead / dying and so was Uttara mom. Or else, wouldn't she atleast save her mother? If she was present ,there's no way in hell she'd just stand and watch her own mother die.
Also, we're forgetting Maha Sapera was there with his special binn against Naagins. Bharni is no naagrani and she can't match or win against Maha Sapera.
We're thinking of hee as too powerful whereas her power has limits. Why would they even need naagrani if they're capable of defeating the Suris and Erul by themselves ? They already knew which the Suris were and instead of killing them why they waited just observing them from safe distance?
Bharni , if she'd tried to interfere in the mass killing of Purvi's family, the only thing she'd have achieved is getting killed herself. And she couldn't do that , her life was meant to support her naagrani later.
1