I understand your point Hedwig trust me..I belonged to that school of thought few months back but I’ll tell where we go wrong in all of this.
In this whole situation you forgot to empathise with the thousand people who felt hurt(again who had no hands in the rape case and who are extremely sensitive towards their gods).You feel the need to defend the cartoonist and Vikrant but when someone reacts because they felt insulted seeing the cartoon you ask them to be kind towards the cartoonist.So you aren’t being kind the ones who got offended..otherwise you would have empathised with them too.
I can empathise with the people who were genuinely hurt and I am all for them making their voice hurt. What I cannot condone is the level of vitriol that is being displayed and the non stop attacks on someone. If they had simply called him out and let it go I would have understood. And for the people who did that, i have no problems with you. It’s the other kind, the ones who are hounding him relentlessly even after he apologised and wanting to ruin his career. That I cannot empathise with.
And when I say I am being kind to the cartoonist I mean that I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt and understand that the “bhakts” were referring to the bhakts who were defending the kathit rapists in the name of religion. I still think it was a badly made cartoon and wholly unnecessary but I can try to understand the intent there. I don’t understand the intent behind harassing an actor over a mistake he made many years ago that he has acknowledged and apologised for. If you can demonstrate how doing that is being kind to people who were hurt I will support you.
20