Just curious what changed? - Page 4

Akshara misrepresented Abhimanyu to Abhinav and he happily lapped up her version without question cuz he wanted a kid and this kid who has no ability to vocalize what it wants overnight became his child.....the mother was selfish and vindictive in wanting to cut off the real father and he happily supported her selfishness without any thought spared for the real father whom he's never even met or knows enough to be sure that he didn't want the child that Nav is jamaaoing kabza on.....lol that is the pinnacle of manipulated narrative in this leap

Originally posted by: chaipaani

Main kaun hun ji koi nahi. Main woh Mr India hun. Hence, the poetic justice is happening and now Abhi ko toh sochna hi nahi hai k Abhinav the super papa wants to be a papa to his real bacha or not kyunki slowly slowly sabki yaadon se Mr India ho rahe hain

Marriage so successful you didn't know the ex ka full name for 6 years

@bold iske liye ek special course krna padhta hai

https://tenor.com/bl2hD.gif

#MarriageGoals KASAULI style.....seekhiye Sharmaji se kaise shaadi nibhaate hain 6 saal tak without knowing anything about your wife's family or the actual father of the kid that you are claiming as your own

Why not?

A couple reuniting after a divorce seems more progressive then an heiress to a jewelry empire who has a degree in musical therapy living with then marrying a taxi driver she met on the bus because she can't take care of her own child is lol.

Originally posted by: PeacefulLove

Moving on is progressive with guy who divorced her twice and got engaged to sister twice or thrice.. Didn't knew that..

Originally posted by: AreYaar

#MarriageGoals KASAULI style.....seekhiye Sharmaji se kaise shaadi nibhaate hain 6 saal tak without knowing anything about your wife's family or the actual father of the kid that you are claiming as your own

Indeed. I have learnt my lessons this or nothing.

Sharma ji was like I just like to go with the flow and leave everything to the destiny.

Or sometimes he has taken jab we mets akeli ladki khuli tizori k saman hoti hai way to serious. Yeh sab Sharmaji ki atrangi or rochak baaton mein se hain mera isme yogdaan nahi hai 🤭

Originally posted by: yellomellow

Why not?

A couple reuniting after a divorce seems more progressive then an heiress to a jewelry empire who has a degree in musical therapy living with then marrying a taxi driver she met on the bus because she can't take care of her own child is lol.

Well she was neither progressive that time nor now. The good thing she did was moving on from toxic guy to good guy

She didn't marry him for his money or profession (taxi driver) but seeing his goodness for 7+ months or maybe because she needed a father for his son.

But lol you guys will never agree so no point arguing. I should not have even wasted my time replying in this thread.

Originally posted by: Krinya

Nothing really changed except for the false narratives.

Abhim wasn't wrong to show anger on akshara , akshara shouldn't have come in front of him

Abhim wasn't wrong in divorcing akshara , akshara was wrong to divorce him & leave him.

Abhim wasn't wrong in not listening to her distress calls , akshara was , to misunderstand his trauma.

Abhim wasn't wrong in moving on but akshara was ..

Abhim wasn't wrong in engaging arohi for ruhi but akshara is , for abhir .

Basically abhim is nowhere wrong in acting but akshara is , in reacting.

She's pathetic but dr scores equally. Marriage involves 2 people. If Dr still loves her after accusations & their history, big deal she crawled bk to him ..I toh call them Umar qaid couple 💑

Because he is great and can’t be wrong

Originally posted by: yellomellow

Why not?

A couple reuniting after a divorce seems more progressive then an heiress to a jewelry empire who has a degree in musical therapy living with then marrying a taxi driver she met on the bus because she can't take care of her own child is lol.

Because all toxic things are painted as fairy tales in reality…and real things don’t seem fair to people

Originally posted by: India_TV

What changed?? Of course the DULHA!!

Last time when Akshu moved on, she moved on with Abhinav-the Accha aadmi- who was with her during the most difficult time of her life…

Now she is shown to b moving on with Abhi- aadha gussa and aadha ego- the person who threw divorce papers at her face twice.. and left her alone during the most difficult time of her life!!!

Khud hi decide kar liya to roam about penniless in Pathankot - which was not at all needed - mast aish karti Goenka house me ya with their money - problem hi nahi thi kuch! She was in touch with them for 6 years - Bade Papa went to bring her back and even visited Abhir as a baby- toh where was this difficulty in her life ? 🤷‍♀️

Abhinav maybe didn’t know how rich she was but we as audience know everything! Her friend in Pathankot gave progressive and wise advice that life doesn’t end with divorce! Par Akshara ji never listens to anything reasonable! 🤦‍♀️

Edited out member attack

@bold This is my point lol. Her behavior then and now isn't progressive so why the difference in reactions to her flipping now lol.

Who she marries or doesn't marry doesn't change the fact that she is an educated woman that didn't need ANY man in her life. Giving her child to stranger because she saw their "goodness" when she could easily raise her child in a better environment where he didn't need to stress over financial issues or have an identity crisis at the age of six isn't progressive.

I don't agree with you but thanks for sharing your perspective.

Originally posted by: PeacefulLove

Well she was neither progressive that time nor now. The good thing she did was moving on from toxic guy to good guy

She didn't marry him for his money or profession (taxi driver) but seeing his goodness for 7+ months or maybe because she needed a father for his son.

But lol you guys will never agree so no point arguing. I should not have even wasted my time replying in this thread.

Originally posted by: AreYaar

It's very simple....as per recent ITV trends on SP shows, a Colored Textthird angle is deified randomly as per the whims of the script and all characters are shown to hail him/her all day claiming that the third angle is another avatar of God who does great things no one else can......so that is why whatever is done in service of the third angle is hailed as the right and "green flag" and "progressive" choice.

MeanwhileColored Text the male lead of the story is vilified for every mistake - even mistakes that most human beings would make in general....anger and impulse are very common emotions found in every other person....but in Star Plus shows these days, the narrative is being pushed that showing anger in one episode totally makes you irredeemable as a person and all other good you have done in the whole story is also washed away

That is why the standards suddenly change if the FL now tries to use the same logic to go back to the ML....apparently that logic was specially crafted only to be used on the third angle who is a living God for the purpose of this narrative. As per makers, people want to see forcefully glorified characters hailed as Gods all day rather than actual human beings with substance and human traits

@bold 1 I would actually like to know which shows you are talking about because as far as I remember leaving one or two shows the third angle is always turned Negative to glorify the lead

Every other itv show introduces third angle at one point of the show and yes he or she is introduced as a good person supportive to the lead of helping nature and then as soon as fl and ml comes face to face that very good natured third angle is suddenly turned negative you know planning and plotting against the leads

You know when the promo came out of maha Milap of akshara and Abhimanyu I was very sure that Abhinav will be turned negative just to whitewash Abhimanyu’s past deeds but nothing of that sort happened so I guess people went on to FL then.

You know another very famous track in itv’s. Male lead throwing the Female lead out of his life and female lead finding out she is pregnant female lead decides to hide her pregnancy and baby from male lead because of his past bad actions but when the truth comes out female lead is blamed for hiding the truth and all the bad deeds of male lead are whitewashed because of that one lie

You I will never get this thing No matter what pathetic things male lead does to fl but as soon as FL lead gets pregnant her first step should be to go back running to that guy and tell him oh my sperm donor I am pregnant with your child

I will endure all the pain carry the child for nine months bear with all the complications of that pregnancy go through the pain of delivering the child but as soon as the child is born I will give it to you because you are the BIOLOGICAL FATHER and have more rights than me on the child

@bold 2 it’s not about anger issues that made the ml lead bad but in that anger throwing your wife out of your life again and again is wrong

Marriage is not a joke that you can divorce and marry and again divorce and remarry your spouse at your own convenience

Got angry threw divorce paper on face sometimes later realised no I want her back married again got angry again threw divorce papers on face and then after sometime came back let’s marry again